Discover
The Political Scene | The New Yorker

The Political Scene | The New Yorker
Author: WNYC Studios and The New Yorker
Subscribed: 197,092Played: 2,813,699Subscribe
Share
© Condé Nast. All rights reserved.
Description
Join The New Yorker’s writers and editors for reporting, insight, and analysis of the most pressing political issues of our time. On Mondays, David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, presents conversations and feature stories about current events. On Wednesdays, the senior editor Tyler Foggatt goes deep on a consequential political story via far-reaching interviews with staff writers and outside experts. And, on Fridays, the staff writers Susan B. Glasser, Jane Mayer, and Evan Osnos discuss the latest developments in Washington and beyond, offering an encompassing understanding of this moment in American politics.
510 Episodes
Reverse
In Donald Trump’s first term in office, the American Civil Liberties Union filed four hundred and thirty-four lawsuits against the Administration. Since Trump’s second Inauguration, the A.C.L.U. has filed cases to block executive orders ending birthright citizenship, defunding gender-affirming health care, and more. If the Administration defies a judge’s order to fully reinstate government funds frozen by executive order, Anthony Romero, the A.C.L.U.’s executive director, says, we will have arrived at a constitutional crisis. “We’re at the Rubicon,” Romero says. “Whether we’ve crossed it remains to be seen.” Romero has held the job since 2001—he started just days before September 11, 2001—and has done the job under four Presidents. He tells David Remnick that it’s nothing new for Presidents to chafe at judicial obstacles to implement their agendas; Romero mentions Bill Clinton’s attempts to strip courts of certain powers as notably aggressive. But, “if Trump decides to flagrantly defy a judicial order, then I think . . . we’ve got to take to the streets in a different way. We’ve got to shut down this country.”
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The essayist and cultural critic Brady Brickner-Wood talks with Tyler Foggatt about the opposition Donald Trump encountered in his first Presidential term, why many liberals are feeling a sense of resignation, and the Democratic Party’s struggle to present a unifying message. Plus, the political commentary embedded in Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl halftime show. This week’s reading:
“What Happened to the Trump Resistance?,” by Brady Brickner-Wood
“The War on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion,” by Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor
“The Fears of the Undocumented,” by Geraldo Cadava
“The Madness of Donald Trump,” by David Remnick
“Elon Musk and Donald Trump Are Not Fixing U.S. Foreign Aid but Destroying It,” by John Cassidy
“Elon Musk’s A.I.-Fuelled War on Human Agency,” by Kyle Chayka
“What Happens if Trump Defies the Courts,” by Isaac Chotiner
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Many of the most draconian measures implemented in the first couple weeks of the new Trump Administration have been justified as emergency actions to root out D.E.I.—diversity, equity, and inclusion—including the freeze (currently rescinded) of trillions of dollars in federal grants. The tragic plane crash in Washington, the President baselessly suggested, might also be the result of D.E.I. Typically, D.E.I. describes policies at large companies or institutions to encourage more diverse workplaces. In the Administration’s rhetoric, D.E.I. is discrimination pure and simple, and the root of much of what ails the nation. “D.E.I. is the boogeyman for anything,” Jelani Cobb tells David Remnick. Cobb is a longtime staff writer, and the dean of Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism. “If there’s a terrible tragedy . . . if there is something going wrong in any part of your life, if there are fires happening in California, then you can bet that, somehow, another D.E.I. is there.” Although affirmative-action policies in university admissions were found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, D.E.I. describes a broad array of actions without a specific definition. “It’s that malleability,” Cobb reflects, that makes D.E.I. a useful target, “one source that you can use to blame every single failing or shortcoming or difficulty in life on.”
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable is joined by Atul Gawande, the former head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, to discuss Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s rapid-fire dismantling of the agency. They explore the life-and-death implications of the Trump Administration ending foreign aid, why the agency was targeted, and which federal agencies might be next. This week’s reading:
“Behind the Chaotic Attempt to Freeze Federal Assistance,” by Atul Gawande
“Elon Musk’s Revolutionary Terror,” by Susan B. Glasser
“Donald Trump’s Madness on Gaza,” by David Remnick
“How Donald Trump Is Transforming Executive Power,” by Isaac Chotiner
“What Happened to the Trump Resistance?” by Brady Brickner-Wood
“Donald Trump’s Anti-Woke Wrecking Ball,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells
“Trump’s Trade War Is Only Getting Going,” by John Cassidy
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Matthew L. Wald joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss the political aftermath of last week’s horrific collision between an American Airlines plane and a Black Hawk military helicopter. They look at the current state of airline safety, the changes afoot at the Federal Aviation Administration, and President Trump’s wild pronouncements that somehow diversity initiatives were to blame for the crash that claimed sixty-seven lives. “The culture warriors, with such a vengeance, are now turning to the F.A.A.—it’s something new and it’s not healthy,” Wald says. This week’s reading:
“How to Understand the Reagan Airport Crash,” by Matthew L. Wald
“How Donald Trump Is Transforming Executive Power,” by Isaac Chotiner
“The U.S. Military’s Recruiting Crisis,” by Dexter Filkins
“Donald Trump’s Anti-Woke Wrecking Ball,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells
“Kash Patel’s Political-Persecution Fantasies,” by Tess Owen
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
In the nineteen-eighties and nineties, Bill Gates was the best known of a new breed: the tech mogul—a coder who had figured out how to run a business, and who then seemed to be running the world. Gates was ranked the richest person in the world for many years. In a new memoir, “Source Code,” he explains how he got there. The book focusses on Gates’s early life, and just through the founding of Microsoft. Since stepping away from the company, Gates has devoted himself to his foundation, which is one of the largest nonprofits working on public health around the globe. That has made him the target of conspiracy theories by anti-vaxxers, including Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has asserted that Gates and Anthony Fauci are together responsible for millions of deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gates views the rise of conspiracy thinking as symptomatic of larger trends in American society exacerbated by technology. “The fact that outrage is rewarded because it’s more engaging, that’s kind of a human weakness,” he tells David Remnick. “And the fact that I thought everybody would be doing deep analysis of facts and seeking out the actual studies on vaccine safety—boy, was that naïve. When the pandemic came, people wanted some evil genius to be behind it. Not some bat biology.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable discusses the fallout of the White House releasing, and then rescinding, a memo intended to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans. The incident, as well as this week’s Senate confirmation hearings for controversial Cabinet nominees such as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Kash Patel, offers Democrats an opportunity to seize control of the narrative—if they can get organized, Sheldon Whitehouse, the Democratic senator from Rhode Island, says. “If what Democrats are doing is running around calling them chaotic and incompetent, that’s not going to win the day unless those charges are connected to actual harms happening to regular people.”This week’s reading:
“Donald Trump’s Cabinet of Revenge,” by Susan B. Glasser
“Trump’s Orders Sow Chaos Inside the Nation’s Enforcer of Equal Opportunity,” by E. Tammy Kim
“Kash Patel’s Political-Persecution Fantasies,” by Tess Owen
“Behind the Chaotic Attempt to Freeze Federal Assistance,” by Atul Gawande
“The Junk Science of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,” by Clare Malone
“How Donald Trump Seizes the Primal Power of Naming,” by Jessica Winter
“Trump’s Attempt to Redefine America,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells
Tune in wherever you get your podcasts.To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
On Tuesday, the Trump Administration sent out a memo attempting to put a blanket pause on most federal funding, sowing confusion about financing for student loans, SNAP benefits, nonprofits, and more. The next day, after a backlash, the Administration rescinded the memo, while maintaining that a freeze remains in “full force and effect.” The order created chaos across the federal government, threatening a power struggle between the President, Congress, and the courts. The New Yorker contributor and Harvard Law professor Jeannie Suk Gersen joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss how Trump’s directives are testing how far a President can go. This week’s reading:
“Trump's Attempt to Redefine America,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells
“The Unchecked Authority of Trump's Immigration Orders,” by Jonathan Blitzer
“Donald Trump Throws the Doors to the Patriot Wing Open,” by Antonia Hitchens
“Trump Is Already Drowning Us in Outrages,” by Susan B. Glasser
“Britain’s Foreign Secretary Braces for the Second Trump Age,” by Sam Knight
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable discusses President Trump’s first week in office, during which he broke a record for the most executive orders any modern-day President has signed on Day One. The President’s inaugural address and barrage of orders seemed driven by a sense of grievance, accrued in the course of four years out of office, four criminal prosecutions, and a deep desire for revenge. Will an apparatus of rage, taking form as vengeance, ultimately inhibit the government from performing its functions? Plus, they discuss the Episcopal Bishop Marianne Buddy’s remarks at the interfaith prayer service, and the importance of speaking truth to power. This week’s reading:
“Trump Is Already Drowning Us in Outrages,” by Susan B. Glasser
“The Unchecked Authority of Trump’s Immigration Orders,” by Jonathan Blitzer
“The Big Tech Takeover of American Politics,” by Jay Caspian Kang
“Why Is the Mastermind of Trump’s Tariff Plan Still Sitting at Home in Florida?,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells
“How Much Power Does President Trump Have?,” by Jeannie Suk Gersen
“Donald Trump Invents an Energy Emergency,” by Bill McKibben
“What Trump 2.0 Means for Ukraine and the World,” by Isaac Chotiner
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Within hours of his Inauguration, and shortly after proclaiming that his victory had been preordained by God, Donald Trump signed dozens of executive orders. These included exiting the World Health Organization, attempting to end birthright citizenship in the United States, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico. He also issued pardons for hundreds of the January 6th convicts. David Remnick, the editor of The New Yorker, joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss what Trump’s first days back in office portend for the next four years. “[Trump] hasn’t changed one iota,” Remnick says, “except that his confidence has increased, and his base has increased, and the obedience of the Republican Party leadership is absolute.”This week’s reading:
“Donald Trump’s Inaugural Day of Vindication,” by Susan B. Glasser
“Donald Trump Plays Church,” by Vinson Cunningham.
“ ‘An Oligarchy Is Taking Shape,’ ” by David Remnick
“What Trump 2.0 Means for Ukraine and the World,” by Isaac Chotiner
“Donald Trump Returns to Washington,” by Antonia Hitchens
“Donald Trump Invents an Energy Emergency,” by Bill McKibben
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable discusses this week’s confirmation hearings for Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense and Pam Bondi as Attorney General, and the potential for a “shock and awe” campaign in the first days of Donald Trump’s second term. Plus, as billionaires from many industries gather around the dais on Inauguration Day, what should we make of President Biden’s warning, in the waning days of his Administration, about “an oligarchy taking shape in America”? This week’s reading:
““The Trump Effect”: On Deal-Making and Credit-Claiming in Trump 2.0,” by Susan B. Glasser
“The Pressure Campaign to Get Pete Hegseth Confirmed as Defense Secretary,” by Jane Mayer
“Why the Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Is Happening Now,” by Isaac Chotiner
“ ‘An Oligarchy Is Taking Shape,’ ” by David Remnick
“How Much of the Government Can Donald Trump Dismantle?” by Jeannie Suk Gersen
“The Shock of a Gaza Ceasefire Deal,” by Ruth Margalit
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Eaton and Palisades fires continue to wreak destruction across Los Angeles. They are predicted to become the most expensive fire recovery in American history. As the fires have burned, a torrent of right-wing rage has emerged online. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and Charlie Kirk have attacked liberal mismanagement and blamed D.E.I. programs and “woke” politics for the destruction. Meanwhile, California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, has expressed concerns that the future Trump Administration may add conditions to federal financial-assistance relief for California, something that Republican Congress members have already floated. The New Yorker staff writer Jay Caspian Kang joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss what happens when disaster relief is swept up in the culture war. This week’s reading:
“The Insurance Crisis That Will Follow the California Fires,” by Elizabeth Kolbert
“On the Ground During L.A.’s Wildfire Emergency,” by Emily Witt
“An Arson Attack in Puerto Rico,” by Graciela Mochkofsky
“Elon Musk’s Latest Terrifying Foray Into British Politics,” By Sam Knight
“The Pressure Campaign to Get Pete Hegseth Confirmed as Defense Secretary,” by Jane Mayer
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Representative Ro Khanna of California is in the Democrats’ Congressional Progressive Caucus. And although his district is in the heart of Silicon Valley—and he once worked as a lawyer for tech companies—Khanna is focussed on how Democrats can regain the trust of working-class voters. He knows tech moguls, he talks with them regularly, and he thinks that they are forming a dangerous oligarchy, to the detriment of everyone else. “This is more dangerous than petty corruption. This is more dangerous than, ‘Hey, they just want to maximize their corporation's wealth,’ ”he tells David Remnick. “This is an ideology amongst some that rejects the role of the state.” Although he’s an ally of Bernie Sanders, such as advocating for Medicare for All and free public college, Khanna is not a democratic socialist. He calls himself a progressive capitalist. Real economic growth, he says, requires “a belief in entrepreneurship and technology and in business leaders being part of the solution.”
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable discusses Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to end its fact-checking program across Meta’s social-media sites. Instead, Meta will release a tool that allows readers to add context and corrections to posts, similar to the way one can leave a “community note” on X. What does this choice mean for truth online in the coming Trump Administration, and have “alternative facts,” as they were dubbed by Kellyanne Conway in 2017, won out? Plus, free speech in the era of Donald Trump, lawsuits brought against the mainstream media, and how journalists will cover President Trump’s second Administration.This week’s reading:
“King Donald and the Presidents at the National Cathedral,” by Susan B. Glasser
“Why the MAGA Fight Over H-1B Visas Is Crossing Party Lines,” by John Cassidy
“Lauren Boebert’s Survival Instincts,” by Peter Hessler
Tune in wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
After nearly a decade as Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau has resigned from office. His stepping down follows a years-long decline in popularity, which stands in sharp contrast to his meteoric rise in 2015. It now seems likely that the Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, whose far-right populist support some have likened to Trump’s MAGA movement, will attain Canada’s highest office. The New Yorker staff writer Adam Gopnik joins the show to discuss Trudeau’s descent, Poilievre’s ascent, expectations for the upcoming parliamentary election, and what the future of Canadian politics may hold. This week’s reading:
“Why Justin Trudeau Had to Step Down,” by Adam Gopnik
“How Much Do Democrats Need to Change?,” by Peter Slevin
“Bourbon Street After the Terror,” by Paige Williams
“How Sheriffs Might Power Trump’s Deportation Machine,” by Jessica Pishko
“New Mexico’s Nuclear-Weapons Boom,” by Abe Streep
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Political Scene will be back next week. In the meantime, enjoy a recent episode from The New Yorker’s Critics at Large podcast. Artists owe a great debt to ancient Rome. Over the years, it’s provided a backdrop for countless films and novels, each of which has put forward its own vision of the Empire and what it stood for. The hosts Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss the latest entry in that canon, Ridley Scott’s “Gladiator II,” which has drawn massive audiences and made hundreds of millions of dollars at the box office. The hosts also consider other texts that use the same setting, from the religious epic “Ben-Hur” to Sondheim’s farcical swords-and-sandals parody, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum.” Recently, figures from across the political spectrum have leapt to lay claim to antiquity, even as new translations have underscored how little we really understand about these civilizations. “Make ancient Rome strange again. Take away the analogies,” Schwartz says. “Maybe that’s the appeal of the classics: to try to keep returning and understanding, even as we can’t help holding them up as a mirror.”Read, watch, and listen with the critics:“Gladiator II” (2024)“I, Claudius” (1976)“A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum” (1966)“The Last Temptation of Christ” (1988)“Monty Python’s Life of Brian” (1979)“Cleopatra” (1963)“Spartacus” (1960)“Ben-Hur” (1959)“Gladiator” (2000)“The End of History and the Last Man,” by Francis Fukuyama“I, Claudius,” by Robert Graves“I Hate to Say This, But Men Deserve Better Than Gladiator II,” by Alison Willmore (Vulture)“On Creating a Usable Past,” by Van Wyck Brook (The Dial)Emily Wilson’s translations of the Odyssey and the IliadNew episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The New Yorker staff writer Jay Caspian Kang joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss efforts by the U.S. government to rein in social media, including the latest attempt to ban TikTok. While Kang agrees that society should be more conscientious about how we, especially children, use social media, he argues that efforts to ban these apps also violate the First Amendment. “Social media has become the public square, even if it is privately owned,” he says. This episode was originally published in March, 2024.This week’s reading:“The Misguided Attempt to Control Tiktok,” by Jay Caspian KangTo discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
President Jimmy Carter has died at the age of one-hundred. He is remembered as a man of paradoxes: an evangelical-Christian Democrat, a white Southern champion of civil rights and solar energy, and a one-term President whose policies have come to seem prescient. Carter was unpopular when he departed the White House, in 1981, but, more than any other President, he saw his reputation improve after he left office. What does the evolution of Carter’s legacy tell us about American politics, and about ourselves? Lawrence Wright spent significant time with Carter and even wrote a play about the Camp David Accords, the peace deal that only Carter, Wright argues, could have brokered between Israel and Egypt. He joins Tyler Foggatt to remember Carter as a man and leader.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
The Washington Roundtable revisits an episode recorded after Henry Kissinger’s death, in November, 2023. Susan B. Glasser, Jane Mayer and Evan Osnos evaluate Kissinger’s controversial legacy, share anecdotes from his time in and around Washington, and discuss how he continued to shape U.S. foreign policy long after leaving the State Department.“There are not that many hundred-year-olds who insist upon their own relevance and actually are relevant,” Glasser says.This week’s reading:
“Henry Kissinger’s Hard Compromises,” by Evan Osnos
“Why Washington Couldn’t Quit Kissinger,” by Isaac Chotiner
This episode was originally published in December, 2023.To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send in feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com with “The Political Scene” in the subject line.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
From the conflict in Gaza and the war in Ukraine to political chaos across Europe and the reëlection of Donald Trump, 2024 has been among the most tumultuous years in recent memory. Isaac Chotiner, the primary contributor to The New Yorker’s Q. & A. segment, has been following it all. He joins the show to reflect on his favorite interviews of the year, and to discuss 2024’s two biggest stories: the violence in Gaza and the reëlection of Donald Trump. Chotiner also talks about Joe Biden’s legacy, and his view on how Biden’s Presidency will be regarded by history.This week’s reading:
“The Year in Brain Rot,” by Jessica Winter
“Luigi Mangione and the Making of a Modern Antihero,” by Jessica Winter
“Syria After Assad,” by Robin Wright
“In South Korea, a Blueprint for Resisting Autocracy?,” by E. Tammy Kim
Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Top Podcasts
The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best News Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Business Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now – June 2024The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Dan Bongino Show Podcast Right Now – June 20The Best New Mark Levin Podcast – June 2024
I hope he's right that the SCOTUS would stand.
Oh Gawd. He was "saved" by something. Highly doubt it was "God". Most of us, still existing here on Earth One-- know that that assassination attempt last summer was a complete and totally planned occurrence, that the orange lunatic was in on. There's so many reasons to make this claim-- mostly (and Im not even a gun expert)-- if you use a military-grade weapon, like the shooter had last summer, You. Don't. Miss. Your. Target... the way this guy did. Also-- the dude was NOT a "left wing lunatic" (like orange lunatic likes to call his critics). The dude was a .... (wait for it).... Registered Republican (aka: Maga cult member). And lastly... (takes deep breath)... just look at the pathetic behavior on display, as OL was being led off the stage; most others, in this kind of scenario... The Last thing you're going to be thinking of, right before being led off stage (and right after almost having your right ear completely torn off) is throwing up a righteous, indignatious fist. Right? Seems
The title of this episode could also easily be "The Death of Truth". "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will come to eventually believe it. " J Goebbels
Why do learned journalists say things like "her and her late husband gave"?...
Kamala Harris on the Breakfast Club / Charlemagne tha Fob🙄 Really James Carville? Just another sign of how unresponsive Boomer Dems are to tha Culture. Newsflash he's not the voice of it. He's proven himself to be extremely problematic especially since his comments on Cassie Ventura last Dec. Hire Kendrick Lamar or Stacy Abrams or Tisa Tells before you all presume to know who tha Culture resonates with https://youtu.be/B-PaEufR9Zg?si=guzQP4iN2eW3TERI
what a show, these guys should take over Harris campaign immediately.
The interview is kinda short, isn't?
the grating voice of the woman makes this otherwise interesting podcast (an AUDIO medium) impossible to listen to. need to skip her parts to keep my sanity
Hi i love sex my contact) here)) https://vipdeit.com/sex21.html
Tramp = idiot
Test
this one was as snarky as can be. Two women laughing at men.. nice.. sooo 2024!
Trump never start any war👏
I can't listen to this. The false grating whining American voice (made up accent) makes it impossible to concentrate because all I want to do is punch my phone.. shame really as it sounded like it was going to be a good episode.
Perhaps voters would respond differently in polls if the media would cover more substantive issues, like the impact of the infrastructure bill, the chips act & lower prescription drug costs instead of obsessively talking about Biden’s age.
the exact same material was broadcasted on Radio Hour.
this guy is acting surprised Russians used the Russian horde stradgey?
This wad a very sad interview. I pray that Robert finds peace from his truly tortured past.
no "prominent elected" democratic candidate challenging Biden? right, but there *ARE* other challengers - please now do a segment on Ms. Williamson! i know you are not impartial, but please at least aknowledge.
the cluelessness of the guest and host about censorship form social media mobs shocks me. because we should allow th author to publish the novel and allow people to read it to judge for themselves. no matter where there from inorser to judge foe themselves to see if the criticism is right or wrong. because now the author pulled it no one can see or judge if it harmful or not. to me this is censorship for one simple reason. the author pull it due to an outrage of a handful of passionate peiple on social media. who review bomb her book on good read. review bombing to me is a harassment tactics you see when a group of people want people to enjoy a price of entertainment. for her to pull the book from these harassers no matter the reason scares me because if you get a group of on social media pissed off enough you can get people to shut up and agree with you. that what I see as possible cenorship going forward.