Claim OwnershipThe Steady Stater
Subscribed: 17Played: 487
Subscribe
© 2024 The Steady Stater
Description
The Steady Stater, hosted by Brian Czech, is a podcast of the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy, dedicated to exploring limits to growth and sustainable solutions. Czech and his guests discuss the principles of steady-state economics and how they apply to contemporary politics and policy. The Steady Stater airs every Monday at 8:00 a.m. EST.
62 Episodes
Reverse
Top Podcasts
The Best New Mark Levin Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New VINCE Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Joe Rogan Experience Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Sports Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Business Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New News Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New Comedy Podcast Right Now - March 2025The Best New True Crime Podcast Right Now - March 2025
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States
Brian's mic is too close. I can hear him breathing and swallowing, even over the sound of the guest.
Mr. Suarez was a great and gracious guest. However, the format of this interview was amateurish. The questions were mostly basic and their scripted delivery missed opportunities for actual engagement with Mr. Suarez's points, organic follow-up questions, momentum, etc. The intro was... unprofessional, which led to a trite first question for which there was no follow-up. I'm sure Brian is very knowledgeable and dedicated, but I question whether he's the best choice for hosting this podcast.
This format seems very ineffective. Far too often, it's merely Brian reading a script from his soapbox. It's not enough to use CASSE's staff as props to read scripted questions to Brian. This podcast needs guests who can discuss the hurdles to progress with the SSE agenda, as well as critics and proponents of alternatives.
Seems more like internal guidance than an external communication.
@20:06: Some pretty loose causal connections there. Also, Mr. Czech seems to misuse the term "lame duck" and the Donald Duck reference adds nothing. Worthwhile theme, but the podcast content needs to be tightened up with more focus per episode, and more substance (for my taste). I'd have thought the first episode would lay out more of the detailed problem statement and analysis.