The Trial Of Alex Murdaugh

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Murders, embezzlements, and shocking accusations - the tale of the Murdaugh family, once regarded as legal royalty in South Carolina, reads more like a crime thriller than real life. The newest revelations from Netflix's documentary, shining a light on the family's darkest secrets, begs the question: Just how deep does the twisted web of deceit run in this seemingly cursed dynasty?  A recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, delved into this very topic, engaging with Clinical and Forensic Psychologist and licensed Private Investigator, Joni Johnston.  One of the newest revelations involves the 'Curtis cutting cousin', Eddie Smith. In the documentary, when Eddie was questioned about the incident where Alex Murdaugh alleged that Smith tried to kill him upon his request, he provided a chilling response. Eddie claimed that Alec had confided in him about his fears: "They're going to be able to prove that I'm responsible for Maggie and Paul." Johnston remarks on this revelation, “It’s the elephant in the room. It absolutely could be true.”    However, the veracity of this claim remains in question, given Eddie Smith's reputation. Brueski highlights the inconsistency, noting, “Eddie’s already kind of proven not to be that credible. It’s like, what do you believe out of Eddie?”    Further complicating the matter is Alec’s recent admittance of guilt, a decision to plead guilty to 22 federal charges, including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering. Johnston contemplates this sudden change in Alec’s stance, suggesting it's more about his self-interest and less about moral awakening. "Either that or he is starting to become more concerned about his reputation...I can promise you there’s a self-interest involved here."    Yet, the family's intricate web of lies and deceit seems to have historical roots. An interview with Paul Murdaugh's former girlfriend in the documentary provides a shocking account of family patriarch, Randolph Murdaugh. During a marital dispute, Randolph went to the extreme of publishing his wife, Miss Libby’s obituary in the local newspaper, despite her being alive – a chilling power play to dissuade her from pursuing a divorce.    When posed with the question about the psychology of such a family, where such actions were normalized, Johnston reflects on the values instilled. “It certainly speaks to this level of self-interest. Narcissism. I’m going to get what I want. No matter who gets hurt.” Johnston elaborates that these behaviors, having been witnessed by their offspring, perpetuates a cycle of values misaligned with societal norms.    Diving deeper into this psychology, Johnston provides a perspective on why such individuals might not feel shame for their actions. “If those are your values, shame wouldn’t come into it at all.” This statement underscores a profound disconnect between personal values and broader societal standards, highlighting the extent of the Murdaugh family's alleged detachment from societal norms.    While the Murdaugh family saga continues to unravel, revealing layers of secrets and manipulation, one can't help but wonder: How did such a prominent family spiral into this abyss? What drove them to these extremes? And most importantly, were they always destined for this grim fate, or was it a product of generational values gone awry?    With the world watching and waiting for the next twist in this riveting saga, one must ask: If the sins of the father are indeed visited upon the son, what legacy does the Murdaugh family leave behind? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In an explosive revelation from the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, a former felony prosecutor and attorney, Eric Faddis, weighs in on recent allegations of jury tampering in the Alex Murdaugh case. The twist? It wasn't from an external source, but from a figure deeply embedded in the court's infrastructure: the clerk of court.    "We've got an allegation that the clerk of court is actively influencing the jury to convict this man," Faddis shared, underscoring the gravity of the situation. This isn't just about mere gossip or behind-the-scenes banter. This is about a potentially severe miscarriage of justice.    For those unfamiliar, Alex Murdaugh is currently embroiled in allegations of killing his wife and son. "Say what you want about Alex Murdaugh... he deserves a fair trial," stated Faddis. The fundamental pillar of the justice system is the assurance of a fair trial, irrespective of the accusations or public sentiment.    The crux of the matter is that if the allegations prove true, it could be grounds to overturn Murdaugh's convictions. "I'm telling you that could be a meritorious ground to overturn these convictions of Alec Murdoch," Faddis added, pointing out the severity of the situation.    But what happens after overturning the verdict? Eric Faddis clarified, "In most instances... it would almost always go to a new trial." The scenario might play out in the public eye once again, as the trial would potentially be rehashed in media.    Faddis' insights into court chambers were equally revealing. "People are humans back there," he noted. There's chatter, speculation, and talk about the various players involved in trials. Yet, while such discussions among court staff might be expected to some degree, actively influencing a jury is on another level. Murdaugh's defense is arguing that the alleged influence was so profound that it affected the fairness of the trial.    The central figure under scrutiny, Rebecca Hill, the clerk of court, is alleged to have directly conversed with jury members, making unsolicited remarks about Murdaugh's guilt. These claims, if validated, raise bigger questions about the culture within the courthouse. Faddis pondered, "Is this more systemic of a culture... or is this just one person who's a little bit too vocal than others?"    Another pressing concern is the venue of Murdaugh's ongoing financial fraud cases. With the same judge and court staff, there's an increasing clamor for a change of venue. Faddis remarked, "He's still got the financial fraud cases not only in that same courthouse, but in front of that same judge... that's got to be ferreted out to ensure that... he still deserves a fair trial."    What's in store for the clerk of court if found guilty of these allegations? "In at least in Colorado where I practice that could potentially be grounds for jury tampering, which is a felony," Faddis highlighted. The repercussions would be significant, both legally and professionally.    Closing on a note from the past, Faddis recollected the renowned attorney Clarence Darrow, who faced similar allegations. "The famous attorney Clarence Darrow actually got popped for jury tampering and... was charged with a felony."    As the podcast episode wrapped up, listeners were left contemplating: if improprieties can allegedly occur in a case as high-profile as Murdaugh's, how many other verdicts may hang in the balance due to overlooked influences? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a major turn of events, the embattled South Carolina attorney, Alex Murdaugh, has pleaded guilty to a series of federal charges. Following his conviction in March for the murders of his wife and son, this latest development adds another dark chapter to the narrative surrounding one of South Carolina’s once-prominent legal families.    Murdaugh appeared before US District Court Judge Richard Gergel in Charleston, South Carolina on Thursday, where he admitted guilt to nearly two dozen federal fraud and money laundering charges. The courtroom atmosphere was thick with emotion as Murdaugh, tearfully confessing, said he was pleading guilty "of his own free will" and so that his son "could see him take responsibility for his actions." He also expressed his desire to help his victims find healing, as reported by attorneys present during the hearing.    As per the official plea agreement, Murdaugh will accept responsibility for 22 charges. These include one count of conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud, five counts of wire fraud, a single count of bank fraud, another count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and a staggering 14 counts of money laundering. The severity of these charges is underscored by their potential punishment: some can lead to a maximum of 20 years in federal prison, while others could result in up to 30 years behind bars.    These charges stem from a scheme where Murdaugh, in conjunction with a bank employee, allegedly defrauded his personal injury clients and laundered over $7 million. The indictment states that Murdaugh used these ill-gotten funds for "personal benefit," which included settling personal loans and covering personal expenses.    The plea's conditions stipulate that if Murdaugh adheres to the agreement, federal attorneys will propose that any federal prison time runs concurrently with any state sentence given for the same offenses.    However, this is far from the end of Murdaugh's legal woes. He represents the third generation of the Murdaugh family – a lineage of esteemed lawyers and solicitors that once commanded significant influence in South Carolina’s Lowcountry. The conviction for the 2021 murders of his wife and son has already sentenced him to life without parole. Yet, claims of courtroom tampering by a clerk during his trial have led to demands for a new trial by his defense team. This controversial claim is under investigation, with South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson pointing out “significant factual disputes” that might jeopardize the credibility of Murdaugh’s assertions.    Moreover, Murdaugh remains enmeshed in several other legal battles, both at the state and federal levels, where he faces more than 100 additional charges. One such upcoming trial in November relates to allegations of stolen settlement funds from the late housekeeper of the Murdaugh family, Gloria Satterfield. These allegations are among the first in a long line that accuses Murdaugh of defrauding victims of millions. His alleged financial crimes include embezzlement, computer crime, money laundering, and even tax evasion.    The case of Alex Murdaugh, given his family's storied history in South Carolina, underscores a dramatic fall from grace. While his admission of guilt in federal court marks a significant moment in this saga, the numerous charges he still faces indicate that the final chapter is yet to be written. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a justice system's very culture endanger the sanctity of a trial? The setting of the trial date for Alex Murdaugh on November 27th, concerning his financial crimes against deceased housekeeper Gloria Satterfield, which is among the 101 state charges against him, has brought up a bevy of questions surrounding courtroom ethics in South Carolina. The "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski and featuring psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, dug deep into the matter, raising questions about the alleged culture that exists in South Carolina's courtrooms.    Brueski began by questioning the legitimacy of Murdaugh's upcoming trial in light of recent allegations of jury tampering involving the clerk of court. "Can this go to trial on the 27th? If, in fact, does go that far or does everything in this courthouse need to be reexamined?" he inquired, hinting at deeper systemic issues that might plague the justice system in South Carolina.    Scott responded with palpable concern, saying, "It's shocking to hear about the conversations that the court clerk is alleged to have had." She went on to speculate, "And I would doubt that this is the first time; if this is the way that was happening, this probably is the norm of the culture down there."    The culture in question is the "good old boy" system, notorious for its informal, often questionable ways of doing things. This lax attitude, combined with close-knit relationships in a small community, can sometimes lead to the blurring of professional boundaries. As Scott succinctly puts it, "Small community, everybody's friends, and the rules apparently have been not enforced. It's been lax probably for quite some time."    Brueski further probes into the psyche of the alleged court clerk, asking if she might have believed her actions were justified or if she was unaware of the severity of her actions. "Would you assume that she thought that this was okay behavior?"    Scott, pondering the question, concluded, "Yeah it seems so strange and so apart from the norm that one would think this is not the first time it's happened, that this is just the lady's style." She elaborated, mentioning that while many have vouched for the clerk's good character on the news, it's still plausible for someone to be kind-hearted, yet "clueless and dumb."    The discussion naturally circled back to Murdaugh, with both Brueski and Scott concurring that regardless of one's opinion about him, if jury tampering occurred, he is entitled to a fair trial. "He certainly is entitled to a new trial whether you like him or not, or you think he's a horrible human being, which he is if this did take place," Brueski stated.    The revelations discussed on "Hidden Killers" have indeed thrown the spotlight on South Carolina's legal system. The allegations suggest that the judicial structure's very culture might be compromising the sanctity of trials. As the Murdaugh case unfolds, the broader implications will likely continue to unravel.    With such pressing questions raised about the state's legal culture, one can't help but ponder: How many other courtrooms, unscrutinized and unchecked, might operate under similar, questionable cultures? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski dived deep into the allegations of jury tampering with defense attorney Bob Motta, the host of the "Defense Diaries." The captivating conversation revolved around the appeal for a new trial due to supposed interference with the jury.    "We haven't really heard a whole lot from Rebecca Hill, other than that she denies the charges against her," began Brueski, setting the tone for the conversation.    To the unacquainted, the name Rebecca "Becky" Hill may not ring a bell, but those following the case closely know her as the figure at the center of the alleged tampering controversy. Motta paints a vivid picture of the tight-knit community where the trial took place: "There's so many players down there, and it's such an incestuous area in terms of everyone knowing each other, everyone practices with one another down there."    Jury tampering, in simple terms, involves unauthorized communications or interference with members of a jury to influence the outcome of a trial. Such actions undermine the judicial process, but determining its occurrence can be complex. Addressing this point, Motta asserts, "If she [Hill] said one word about anything relating to the trial, about believing or not, I believe it's jury tampering."    This perspective comes from the inherent power dynamics at play. Rebecca Hill, as an elected official, naturally commands respect and authority in her community. Her word carries weight, making her alleged influence on the jurors even more potent. "Jurors just don’t know... It's an incredibly unusual situation," Motta shared, emphasizing the unique vulnerability jurors might feel during their first trial experience.  Despite the alleged tampering, the crux of the matter remains clear for Motta: every defendant, no matter their perceived guilt or moral standing, deserves a fair trial under the U.S. Constitution. "I detest Murdoch... He's just a terrible person. Notwithstanding that, the guy still has constitutional rights."    This issue is bigger than any individual or case, as Motta puts it, "We're protecting the Constitution." The sanctity of the legal process remains paramount. "Murdoch is the tree. We have to protect the forest," he adds, emphasizing the larger perspective.    Another interesting point raised during the conversation was whether Judge Newman might end up as a witness given the potential involvement and knowledge of the alleged tampering. Adding to the complexity, there's the consideration of moving the trial out of the area due to its heightened media attention. "I don’t know where they’re empaneling a jury that's not gonna have heard about this case," Motta admits, pointing to the immense challenge of finding an unbiased jury pool given the media frenzy surrounding the trial.    Cases like this, as Motta mentions, are among the most significant in his career, not just for their legal complexity but also for their cultural impact. He likens it to the Vallow case in Idaho, which presented its own set of unique challenges and garnered widespread attention.    In the end, the importance of preserving the integrity of the judicial system is evident. It becomes a cautionary tale of ensuring that every individual, regardless of public opinion, gets a fair shot at justice.    And while the podcast episode covered this case in-depth, the broader implications remain: In an era of heightened media scrutiny and interconnected communities, can we truly ensure the sanctity of the jury process? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the world of law and order, it’s not always as black and white as one might think. Recently on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski had an enlightening conversation with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. They delved deep into the murky waters of ethics, especially regarding Alex Murdaugh's trial and the actions of the Clerk of Court, Rebecca Hill.    Rebecca Hill, while holding her role since 2020, has been a part of the court system for many years. Yet, her tenure as the Clerk of Court has not been without controversy. The hosts speculated whether her background and the prevailing culture in South Carolina's courts led her to take actions that many would deem unethical. Tony commented, "It does make you wonder if there's just so much of that going on in South Carolina... most people not only do they participate in it, but maybe they are unaware that this is not the norm."    The podcast discussed how certain practices might be deeply entrenched in a system, making it difficult for newcomers to discern right from wrong. Tony drew a parallel from his experience in music radio, where record labels would directly pay to get certain songs aired. "It wasn't even talked about as being wrong," he said, emphasizing how sometimes unethical behavior becomes normalized if seen regularly.    Dreeke provided insight into how a continuous pattern of unethical actions for personal gain, especially when widely accepted, could blur one's understanding of legality. "When unethical behaviors become the norm because everyone's doing it, you start believing and rationalize your own behavior when you're self-serving," he mentioned. The discussion pointed towards a larger issue of people not recognizing their actions as unethical, especially if it aligns with their self-opinion.    However, what was perhaps most alarming was the speculation around Hill’s trajectory in the system. The hosts contemplated that unethical behaviors might not just erupt spontaneously. Instead, there could have been a progression, starting with minor infringements eventually leading up to something as serious as jury tampering. Tony posed the question, "Where did this begin? What were the first steps of unethical behavior that led to this extreme?"    As the conversation progressed, Dreeke emphasized the critical difference between unethical and illegal, noting that people often tread the line carefully. Yet, in Hill's case, the line might have been inadvertently crossed. He mentioned, "if you were to interview her and ask her and put her on a polygraph... she's not going to say no."    The bigger concern arising from their discussion was the lack of checks and balances in place. Dreeke was surprised at the apparent absence of a clear policy regarding court officials writing books or publicizing ongoing trials. Drawing from his experience in the FBI, he elaborated on the stringent procedures he underwent before publishing any material.    Tony wrapped up the conversation by addressing the fundamental issue of public trust. "The taxpayers are paying her salary, and that's not what she's paid to do," he said, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability, especially in roles that serve the public.    The episode offered a deep dive into the challenges and complexities of the legal system. As Brueski and Dreeke peeled back the layers, listeners were left with a profound understanding of how crucial ethics are, not just in law but in every profession. If anything, this discussion emphasized the importance of introspection, education, and reform in the broader system. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is South Carolina's justice system rotting from the inside? Startling allegations of jury tampering against a clerk of courts have surfaced, casting shadows on the very integrity of the system. But this could just be the tip of an iceberg, hinting at deeper, systemic problems plaguing the courts.    In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski held a revealing conversation with retired FBI Special Agent, Robin Dreeke. The discussion centered around the shocking instance of an accused clerk from South Carolina's court system allegedly tampering with jury decisions. "The public servant, the clerk, is not serving the public, serving themselves, and it completely undermined the case," remarked Brueski.    The gravity of the situation becomes even more palpable when considering the alleged misbehavior came from the clerk of courts, an integral component of the court's structure, responsible for ensuring justice. With such a pivotal role compromised, questions arise about the integrity of other elements within the system. "Should there be a further investigation into the rest of this machine there in South Carolina... all the way down to judges to anybody involved in this process?" Brueski probes.    Dreeke adds weight to this line of thought, emphasizing the need for systemic introspection. “I think you're absolutely right," he concurs, highlighting the nonchalant attitude displayed by the accused and the suspiciously timed release of her book about the case. This kind of behavior, he suggests, doesn't emerge in isolation but is born from a culture where individual gains are prioritized over justice and integrity. "How did it get in her mind that that's appropriate right now? It came from on top that that behavior was okay," Dreeke opines.    Drawing parallels to another incident, Brueski refers to a convict who recently escaped from a Pennsylvania jail, attributing his escape to poor leadership. He juxtaposes the strong leadership shown by Lt. Colonel Bivens of the state police in recapturing the escapee, against the lackluster administration at the prison. "Leadership. And so when you look at this situation, you fast forward it down to South Carolina, how can a public servant publish a book that fast?" Brueski asks.    Echoing this sentiment, Dreeke illustrates that unchecked leadership could potentially harbor a culture of corruption. To uproot such corruption, targeting individuals isn't enough. "You got to go for the top," he states, suggesting an overhaul of the leadership and infrastructure as the only means to affect real change.    A worrying pattern emerges from the conversation. An environment where unethical behavior becomes normalized, where bending rules is not just condoned but also encouraged. As Dreeke describes, it's a setting where "groupthink gets infused in everything," leading individuals to believe such behavior is not only acceptable but entirely regular.    He offers a chilling comparison to a recent scandal involving a former FBI senior executive named Charlie McGonigal, charged and found guilty of receiving a hefty sum from Albanians and undermining Russian sanctions. Such acts make one wonder: how can high-ranking officials consider these actions permissible? “That's a culture," Dreeke asserts, “that says we can do this."    The conversation on "Hidden Killers" raises disconcerting concerns. If individuals at the core of the justice system, whether in South Carolina or elsewhere, perceive rule-breaking as an ingrained part of their culture, the very foundations of the system are at risk. As the investigation into South Carolina's alleged jury tampering unfolds, one can only hope it serves as a wake-up call, urging reform not just in one state but throughout any system vulnerable to corruption. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

How blurred can the lines of justice become when personal interests, pride, and professional ethics collide?    In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski delves into the intricate legal web surrounding Alex Murdaugh with attorney and former Federal prosecutor, Neama Rahmani. The two discussed the much-awaited trial of Murdaugh set for November 27th, focusing on the financial malfeasance involving millions stolen from the family of his deceased housekeeper, Gloria Statterfield.    Rahmani, addressing Brueski's speculations about the November trial date, stated, "Normally I would have said no, but I think they got a decent shot of getting this murder conviction." The stakes are high, especially if allegations of witness tampering involving the court clerk hold water. Such allegations would ideally favor the defense, potentially granting a mistrial. Rahmani emphasized that if these allegations are true, the prosecution should proceed with the fraud case, given Murdaugh's potential risk of acquittal from the murder charges.    But what about the testimony from the previous murder trial where Murdaugh confessed to these financial crimes? Brueski questioned its admissibility. Rahmani clarified, "I think the taint has to do with the jurors and the deliberation process, not with Murdoch's testimony himself." Essentially, regardless of issues surrounding jury deliberations, Murdaugh's admissions are valid evidence in the fraud case.    Another puzzling aspect is Murdaugh's decision to stand trial. He's already admitted to multiple crimes informally. Rahmani pondered this, recalling Murdaugh's testimony, "He gets up there and he says he wants to clear his name and his family name and his son." The former prosecutor highlighted the gravity of Murdaugh's actions, saying, "It's really the worst thing you can do as a lawyer - steal money from your clients." Regardless of Murdaugh's personal distinction between being labeled a thief or a killer, his legal fate seems sealed.    The conversation turned to Corey Fleming, Murdaugh's co-conspirator in the fraud case. Sentenced to ten years, with four of those in federal court, Rahmani expressed the sentence was lenient, especially when considering the magnitude of the crime. "You're revictimizing these victims all over again," Rahmani articulated, emphasizing the severe ethical breach when attorneys take advantage of those they pledge to serve. He cited other lawyers, like Michael Avenatti and Tom Girardi, equating their actions with Murdaugh's, stressing the egregiousness of such crimes in the legal world.    As Brueski and Rahmani unraveled the complexities of the Murdaugh case, it became clear that beyond the court hearings, the central question revolves around the moral fiber of those in the legal profession. Rahmani's poignant assertion towards the end resonates deeply, "I really think they should lose their license and spend a lot of time in prison."    In a world where trust is a currency and legal ethics the gold standard, how many more cases like Murdaugh's lurk in the shadows, waiting for their day in the spotlight? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The world of crime podcasts has been in constant flux with information, conspiracies, and discussions. The recent episode of "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, featuring psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, was no exception. Their focus? Asa Ellerup, the estranged wife of Rex Heuermann, the suspected Long Island serial killer, and her bizarre recent requests.    "Why would the spouse of an accused serial killer want back nearly 300 guns taken from their home in the middle of an investigation?" This intriguing question was at the heart of the conversation between Brueski and Scott. Asa's behavior post the accusations against her husband is perplexing, to say the least.    Brueski observed, "The optics are totally off. I've never seen anyone, the spouse of someone who's accused of being a horrible person. Acting this way. It seems very tone-deaf." He draws attention to her aloofness amidst serious allegations against her husband. This move, demanding the guns amidst an investigation, further projects an image of nonchalance that's perplexing.    Scott shared her insight on the topic, "It does give a very odd vibe. It seems strange. And the first thought that came into my mind when I heard that is she's desperate for money and wants to sell all these guns." She further hypothesized about Asa's personality traits, suggesting quirks or aloof behavior that might have been characteristic of her long before the allegations against her husband emerged.    Brueski added more to the pot, expressing bewilderment at the police's approach. "The police have said the initially they've said we don't think she's done anything. She's fine. She can there, although there has not as far as we're aware yet been any sort of interviews done directly with her, which I also find very odd." The host seems to suggest that Asa's increasingly eccentric behavior might eventually lead the police to look into her role, if any, more deeply.    Scott weighed in, "It sure seems to be unusual behavior and not a, you know, a person with insight. And of course you can be a very odd person and not have any insight and aloof is a good word." She is clear to clarify that odd behavior doesn't necessarily equate with being involved in the crimes. Her concern mirrors that of Brueski - the absence of an interview between the police and Asa.    In the intricate world of crime and its investigation, the public is often enthralled by the macabre and mysterious. In this case, the spotlight, while majorly on Rex Heuermann, also falls curiously on Asa Ellerup. She appears to be an enigma wrapped in a puzzle, and her latest moves have only increased the public's interest in her.    The podcast episode delves into the peculiarities of behavior and the complexities of human psychology. In a chilling situation involving murder allegations, Asa Ellerup stands out as a character that baffles both experts and enthusiasts alike.    As the episode concludes, Brueski observes, "This seems like it might have been a very bizarre household as well. Yes. And these are just people who are bizarre. Yeah. They just didn't quite fit into normal, polite society, I think."    Indeed, as listeners and readers, we are left pondering: Is it just eccentricity or does the Ellerup household hold more dark secrets than we know? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, Tony Brueski dives deep into the sensational case and the looming question that many have been wondering about: Did jury tampering skew the verdict of the high-profile Murdoch trial? Bob Motta, Defense Attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries", weighed in with his perspectives.    Motta speaks about the current developments, or lack thereof, in Rebecca Hill's side, who is at the heart of the tampering allegations. "There has not been a lot coming from Becky Hills camp at all," Motta says. As we wade through the claims, the social media chatter, and the intricacies of the case, the main point of contention remains whether any conversation that Hill, an elected official, had with the jury could be deemed as tampering. Motta firmly believes, "If she said one word about anything relating to the trial, about anything relating to him testifying, about believing or not, I believe it's jury tampering."    This isn’t just about the nuance of legal talk but goes to the very heart of the American judicial system. Jurors are tasked with a civic duty that requires them to remain impartial, unbiased, and uninfluenced. For a person in a position of authority, like Hill, to potentially wield influence on this sacred group is unsettling, to say the least. Motta elaborates, "Jurors just don't know...It's an incredibly unusual situation...they looked at [Hill] in a different light than anyone else in that courthouse."    But at the center of this case is a defendant, Murdoch, whose reputation is less than stellar. Described by Motta as someone who has allegedly stolen "millions of dollars of his client's funds", Murdoch's character has been tried and judged by the public. Yet, Motta reminds listeners that regardless of personal feelings about Murdoch, "He still deserves a fair trial. And if he didn’t get that, then that needs to be corrected." He continues, "Unless we want a country that doesn't have a constitution...we have to abide by the rules."    The larger issue isn’t just about Murdoch or Hill, but the sanctity of the judicial process itself. As Motta points out, "We're protecting the constitution. That's the bigger picture."    The case, given its high-profile nature, also brings up the challenge of finding an impartial jury. Motta shared his experience with a previous high-profile case, where polling indicated that over 90% of potential jurors had already formed an opinion about the case based on media reports. The Murdoch case, having achieved global attention, presents even greater challenges. Motta questions, "I just don't know where they're impaneling a jury that's not gonna have heard about this case."    The podcast episode wrapped up by touching on other intriguing cases, like the Valo trial, showcasing the labyrinthine intricacies of the justice system and the complex moral and ethical dilemmas that come with it.    So, what happens next? As new developments unfold and more information becomes available, the verdict on jury tampering remains uncertain. But one question lingers: Can the sanctity of the jury trial ever truly be protected in an age of information overload and media trials? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Recent developments in the case of Alex Murdaugh, who is set to appear in court on November 27th for state charges related to financial crimes, have become the epicenter of a media storm. As shared on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer shed light on the complexities surrounding the case. Specifically, Murdaugh's connection to the tragic accident involving Gloria Satterfield, as well as the looming shadow of allegations of jury tampering, is leading many to question the credibility and fairness of the legal proceedings.    For the uninitiated, Murdaugh faces state charges for alleged financial crimes. At the heart of the matter is an astounding sum of $8.8 million, involving multiple defendants and victims. "They're even much more complicated typically than a violent crime," Coffindaffer stated on the podcast, indicating the intricate layers and potential for delays in court proceedings.    While the tragic accident surrounding Gloria Satterfield remains a focal point, early public sentiments were inclined to blame the Murdaughs for the incident. Brueski posits, "It just looked bad that they came upon the accident... But it was much more believable what now has been. And they just wanted to take advantage of the money that could be gleaned from this horrible accident."    However, with the intricate web of relationships and the interconnectedness of the town's residents, doubts about the integrity of the trial are beginning to emerge. The latest allegations of jury tampering have added a layer of suspicion to the proceedings. Both hosts stressed the gravity of the situation. Coffindaffer highlights, "I always say, there's two sides to every pancake. They look completely different."    The stakes became notably higher during a recent hearing presided over by Judge Clifton Newman. Concerns are mounting about the potential nullification of the financial crimes trial based on alleged jury tampering during the murder trial. If true, this would undoubtedly cast a long shadow over the legitimacy of the South Carolina justice system.    Jennifer Coffindaffer gives a more detailed insight into the interconnectedness of the town's court system. "You know, I had somebody ask me, Jeez, are there any other attorneys? Attorneys are just on repeat... Defending somebody else that was part of the original trial." This paints a picture of a tight-knit community where everyone knows everyone, further amplifying concerns about impartiality.    The allegations center around Rebecca Hill, a clerk of court, possibly influencing jurors. If proven, this could have serious ramifications for the justice system. Coffindaffer firmly states, "I don't think she's going to be able to, if she did say those things, sort of hide behind the ignorance umbrella."    Tony Brueski adds to the mounting tension by insisting, "I want to see every single juror on the stand with their hand raised and their other hand on a Bible saying what happened." The sentiments echo a deeper concern: in a case as high-profile as this, ensuring the integrity of the trial process is paramount.    Both hosts emphasize the necessity of a fair trial. Brueski states, "I mean, as despicable as Alec Murdaugh is, he still does, as anyone does, deserve a fair trial without someone trying to sway it when it really didn't need to be swayed."    As we await the November 27th trial, the question remains: with such a convoluted backstory and a community closely intertwined, can justice truly be served without bias? And if these allegations hold weight, how will this impact the perception of small-town legal proceedings on a national scale? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the midst of numerous criminal charges, the ongoing saga of Alex Murdaugh seems to add another convoluted layer as Judge Clifton Neumann recently set a new trial date for Murdaugh on the 27th of November. The forthcoming trial will spotlight the millions allegedly misappropriated by Murdaugh from the family of his deceased housekeeper, Gloria Satterfield. This case, however, is only a fragment of the 101 state charges he faces.    On the latest episode of "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into this intricate case with the insights of Bob Motta, a defense attorney and the host of "Defense Diaries." Brueski initiated the conversation by likening the upcoming financial crimes trial to a spinoff of a larger series. He pondered, "What do you think we're gonna see in the spin-off trial of Alec Murdaugh?"    In response, Motta expressed skepticism about the necessity of a trial, considering Murdaugh's admissions during the murder trial relating to the financial crimes. He articulated, "I can't see them prevailing. Why has there not simply been a guilty plea entered?"    One speculated reason is Murdaugh's legal team possibly trying to maneuver him into a federal facility. Motta elucidated on this by explaining the complexities of handling interrelated cases that span years. "When you inject the feds in there, it makes it even more complicated," Motta said, hinting that there might be ongoing attempts to achieve a global settlement, settling all cases simultaneously.    However, the intricacy doesn't end there. If the trial does ensue on the slated date, questions arise about what evidence will be permissible, especially given Murdaugh's prior admissions during the murder trial. Motta clarified, "In this case, they'll be putting that evidence on, whereas in the murder trial, they were just discussing it." But, Motta warns, this upcoming trial will be dry and laden with documents. "It is going to be tons of documents and that's basically it. The fact that it's Murdaugh will create the interest, but people are not going to be enthralled with this trial."    One of the most pressing inquiries is whether Murdaugh's admissions during the murder trial, which were made under oath, can be utilized as evidence in the financial crimes trial. "The question always is how do you get it in," Motta pondered, especially if Murdaugh decides not to testify in the financial crimes trial.    Moreover, there's another angle to consider: if the murder trial is declared a mistrial, what happens to the admissions made during it? Motta clarified, "The sworn testimony having taken place, it took place." He believes that the testimony could still be utilized, especially for impeachment purposes if Murdaugh testifies again.    While the legal intricacies surrounding the Murdaugh cases are complex, one thing is clear: the trials will undoubtedly continue to capture public attention, not just for the crimes themselves, but also for the legal strategies employed.    But as the conversation between Brueski and Motta concluded, one question lingers: If the admission from the murder trial is such strong evidence, will Murdaugh's defense even dare to let him testify again, potentially exposing him to even deeper scrutiny? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a riveting recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosts Tony Brueski and defense attorney Bob Motta of "Defense Diaries" delved into the possible retrial of the Alex Murdaugh murder case. Pondering the changes that might come into play, the conversation revolved around what the potential new trial might look like compared to the original one. At the center of it all is whether the controversial financial details that played a pivotal role in the initial trial will be streamlined.    Alex Murdaugh, a once-prominent lawyer in South Carolina, stands accused of crimes involving the tragic deaths of his wife and son. The case has captivated audiences with its blend of family drama, murder, and financial intrigue.    Bob Motta was keen on emphasizing the potential advantages to the state in a new trial, suggesting that "they can streamline that. They can really whittle that witness list down and just really hit home with the high points." While the state may choose to leave out some witnesses, others who played a significant role in the first trial will likely reappear.    One of the most critical decisions, according to the hosts, would be whether Murdaugh will testify again. Reflecting on Murdaugh’s previous testimony, Motta observed, "I think everybody pretty much agreed that the moment that case turned to definitely guilty is the minute that he opened his mouth on the stand." There's the belief that his prior testimony might come back to haunt him, especially if there were inconsistencies.    As for the financial details of the case, they could drastically influence the retrial. The first trial was almost devoid of them until, as Brueski noted, "Jim said something that kind of opened up the door to discussing that, and then all of that went into the trial." Both hosts seemed to concur that such a disclosure was unlikely to happen again, especially with the knowledge of how it impacted the first trial.    Another vital component in the upcoming trial would be the judge's role. Motta discussed the possibility of a different judge presiding over the retrial. "I think it's gonna have to be a fresh judge," he stated, suggesting that this new judge might have a different stance on some issues, particularly regarding the financial details. The central question remains: "Does the new judge have to abide by the old rulings or does the new judge get to hear a fresh argument on it and make his own ruling?"    Motta underscored the significance of this, stating, "Like the interplay of that is going to be fascinating. Whether or not that's all gonna get in again. Like it's, man it's gonna be a thing."    Interestingly, the hosts noted that while motive played a significant part in the public's perception of the case, it isn't a necessity for a conviction. Touching upon the human need to understand why someone might commit such a heinous act, Motta reflected, "We just, as humans, we wanna know why, even though it's not required under the law to get a conviction on any of the crimes that he was convicted of."    With so many intricate elements and details, the potential retrial of the Alex Murdaugh murder case promises to keep audiences captivated. As the conversation came to a close, Brueski summed it up aptly, "The sequel, sometimes they're better, sometimes they're not. We'll have to see."    Whether the retrial occurs or not, one thing is clear: The narrative surrounding Alex Murdaugh and the tragic deaths of his family will remain a significant point of interest for many. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com