DiscoverThought Adventure Podcast
Thought Adventure Podcast
Claim Ownership

Thought Adventure Podcast

Author: Thought Adventure Podcast

Subscribed: 36Played: 795
Share

Description

Exploring Ideas around Theology, Religion and Islam
42 Episodes
Reverse
https://youtu.be/HjzqpDzk1jY
https://youtu.be/XW8aKZAak70
https://youtu.be/x9n_t9Q2xqo
https://youtu.be/B0MK51Tbih8
https://youtu.be/dHNYCZKXes0
https://youtu.be/h220_WJcwdA           
https://youtu.be/hasgbxDiC24
https://youtu.be/yeTgPiYnWHw
https://youtu.be/_4a5SKkeAQI
https://youtu.be/ktp6bvkXiPE
https://youtu.be/ZEIr-hTT2ic
https://youtu.be/BmYjQpV-2DQ
https://youtu.be/BmYjQpV-2DQ
https://youtu.be/71_dZrMWgVQ In this special brothers Abdul & Jake talked to Alex Malpass, a  well-known Atheist Philosopher, about arguments for God's existence and about Theism and Atheism more generally.
https://youtu.be/g5xh3ZqT8-o
#18 Pascal's Wager

#18 Pascal's Wager

2021-10-2602:56:27

https://youtu.be/HkCKH5PRb1Y
https://youtu.be/OK-kam16tsE
https://youtu.be/OK-kam16tsE
https://youtu.be/gJZeRsnd7cY The “Evil God Argument” is an attempt to demonstrate that all the arguments used to explain away evil or why evil exists while maintaining a belief in the existence of a good God can also be applied in reverse to an evil God.   If then we can easily dismiss the evil God arguments by what seemingly seems to be true about the world then similarly we should also dismiss a good God also. This argument has been popularised by Stephen Law as well as atheist YouTubers like CosmicSkeptic (Alex O’Connor) amongst others.   In this stream we look at whether there is any justification to favour the belief in the existence over a good God rather than an evil one.
https://youtu.be/e9A6HTKrfno Often we hear people saying that Islam’s position is incoherent or illogical. Or that they’ll claim that God is impossible. Similarly some will appeal to mystery when presented with a clear logical contradiction and so it becomes important to actually explain what is considered a logical impossibility. Without clearly knowing what is or isn’t a logical impossibility one cannot formulate a proper argument and on what principle they are appealing to.
loading
Comments