DiscoverToot or Boot
Toot or Boot
Claim Ownership

Toot or Boot

Author: WRKdefined Podcast Network

Subscribed: 2Played: 9
Share

Description

Toot or Boot brings you unfiltered conversations about work — straight from HR insiders who aren’t afraid to tell the truth. With a rotating crew of progressive HR leaders, we break down the latest news and trends to show what’s really happening and why it matters for your job. Whether you’re in HR or just trying to survive your 9-to-5, expect real talk, practical advice, and the occasional laugh to get you through the chaos of modern work.



To find out more, check out tootorboot.com

53 Episodes
Reverse
For decades, SHRM has been the institution shaping HR standards, HR certifications, and workplace policy. But as political tensions rise, protections erode, and credibility questions grow louder, HR leaders are asking a new question: What happens when the largest HR organization in the world stops representing workers — and starts representing itself? In this packed, no-nonsense episode of Toot or Boot originally recorded in November 2024, Stacey Nordwall sits down with Sarika Lamont, Tracie Sponenberg, and Morgan Williams to unpack the long, complicated history of SHRM’s decisions and the ripple effects those choices have had on the HR profession, marginalized employees, and federal policy. The group traces SHRM’s evolution from “the only place HR could go” to an entity criticized for political alliances, removing equity from DEI, paywalling pandemic resources, and most recently, found responsible for discriminating and retaliating against a former employee. They also dive into something that matters even more: the rise of people-first HR communities that filled the vacuum when SHRM didn’t — and what HR practitioners can rely on now. Whether you’re SHRM-certified, SHRM-skeptical, or SHRM-conflicted, this conversation gives you the context you need to understand what’s at stake for HR, workers, and the future of workplace policy. Key takeaways SHRM’s decisions shape HR policy, employment law, and workplace norms worldwide. The organization’s political alignment has shifted sharply — and visibly — in recent years. SHRM paywalled critical COVID resources at the height of crisis. Removing the “E” from DEI sent a damaging message to marginalized workers. Johnny Taylor’s public stances contradict SHRM’s stated neutrality. SHRM’s lobbying often benefits employers, not employees or practitioners. The ongoing discrimination lawsuit highlights internal cultural issues. HR’s community-driven response during COVID created better models for learning and support. Alternatives — Peak HR, Hacking HR, Safe Space, Troop HR, and others — now offer richer, people-centered resources. HR leaders must stay informed because SHRM’s policy influence impacts workers, equity, and the future of the profession. Timestamps 02:00 — How each guest’s SHRM journey shaped their perspective 07:00 — The SHRM–HRCI split and political entanglements 12:00 — SHRM’s silence after George Floyd and LGBTQ+ cases 16:00 — The COVID paywall and the turning point in trust 20:00 — Johnny Taylor’s political positioning and the Labor Secretary shortlist 25:00 — Why SHRM’s power matters for HR and workers 33:00 — The danger of “civility” replacing equity 40:00 — How HR community spaces filled the gap 50:00 — Alternatives to SHRM and where HR is going next SHRM controversy, HR policy, Johnny Taylor, DEI equity removed, SHRM lawsuit, HR community, workplace politics, HR certification, lobbying impact, alternatives to SHRM
Hiring has never felt more confusing — for candidates, recruiters, or the HR teams stuck in the middle. Between ATS myths, bad advice on TikTok, the Mobley v. Workday lawsuit, and a flood of AI-powered recruiting tools no one fully understands, it’s no surprise people are frustrated and misinformed. In this episode of Toot or Boot, Stacey Nordwall is joined by talent experts Dani Herrera and T. Tara Turk-Haynes to pull back the curtain on what actually happens behind the scenes of recruiting. They break down common ATS misconceptions, explain how knockout questions really work, unpack the rise of grifters targeting desperate job seekers, and explore the messy overlap between automation and AI. The trio also digs into the Mobley lawsuit: what triggers instant rejections, when discrimination comes from the humans (not the software), how automation gets misread as AI, and why companies should be terrified of buying shiny tools without asking hard questions about data, bias, legality, and accountability. If you’ve ever wondered why you got rejected in 30 seconds, who really makes hiring decisions, or why every “ATS-proof résumé” online is a scam, this episode gives you the truth — with humor, receipts, and the kind of grounded reality only seasoned recruiters can offer. Key Takeaways Recruiters are not the final decision makers — hiring managers are. ATS systems don’t “reject” people; knockout questions and human setup errors do. Automation ≠ AI — and most instant rejections are automation, not algorithms. Keywords help recruiters search, but keyword stuffing is unnecessary and harmful. Résumé templates claiming to be “ATS-compliant” are pure grift. Many interviewers receive no training, which derails fair hiring. Workday and other large systems are only as ethical as the people who configure them. The Mobley lawsuit highlights systemic, not just AI-driven, discrimination risks. HR teams must ask vendors hard questions about data sources, audits, and bias. Candidates should be wary of bad online advice and seek guidance from real recruiters. Timestamps 00:00 — Why recruiting feels like a black box 02:00 — What recruiters actually control (and don’t) 07:00 — How ATSs really work behind the scenes 14:00 — The truth about keyword myths and “résumé hacks” 20:00 — How knock-out questions trigger instant rejections 23:00 — Grifters preying on job seekers with false promises 28:00 — Workday as ATS and HRIS — why that matters 33:00 — The deeper problem behind Mobley v. Workday 47:00 — When AI amplifies human bias instead of preventing it 55:00 — The questions HR must ask AI vendors now
We’ve been taught that “nice” is the goal at work — be pleasant, be agreeable, don’t rock the boat. But what if niceness is actually keeping us stuck, silencing truth-tellers, and protecting the status quo? In this episode of Toot or Boot, Stacey Nordwall sits down with author and communications strategist Amira Barger to unpack her new book The Price of Nice — a fierce, funny, deeply human guide to understanding how performative niceness, forced neutrality, and “civility” are used to silence real people and reinforce harmful systems. They explore why truth-telling gets punished, how identity and politics always enter the workplace, why leaders cling to neutrality, and what “nerve” really looks like in practice. If you’ve ever swallowed your truth to keep the peace — this episode will give you language, tools, and permission to show up differently and to challenge harm without self-abandoning. Key Takeaways “Niceness” often demands self-abandonment in service of others’ comfort. Kindness and niceness are not the same — kindness requires honesty. Neutrality is not neutral; it protects power, not people. Identity, politics, and lived experience always walk into work with us. Civility can be weaponized to silence truth-tellers and maintain the status quo. The “nerve vs. nice” continuum explains how we’re socialized to stay small. Micro-actions of courage matter as much as big acts of resistance. Leaders need both advocacy and inquiry to create real change. Perfectly assertive communication helps challenge harm without blowing things up. DEI work still happens in micro-spheres — influence what you can control. Timestamps 00:00 — Welcome + why Amira’s work resonates 01:19 — Defining “the price of nice” 03:17 — The story that exposed the harm of niceness 06:41 — Nice vs. nerve: the continuum 10:22 — Kids, truth-telling, and naming what adults ignore 12:03 — Why politics and identity cannot be separated from work 15:42 — The myth of neutrality — and who it protects 20:52 — The weaponization of civility and tone policing 25:19 — Advocacy + inquiry: a better leadership model 30:03 — The Four W Model: navigating hard moments with clarity 36:48 — Micro-actions as everyday nerve 40:31 — The “relay” model of shared resistance Top Keywords niceness vs kindness, workplace neutrality, nerve vs nice, psychological safety, performative civility, identity at work, DEI backlash, assertive communication, leadership inquiry tools, speaking up at work
Work shouldn’t be the worst part of your week — but for too many people, it still is. In this episode of Toot or Boot, Stacey Nordwall talks with Madison Butler — author of Let Them See You — about what it really means to show up as yourself at work, even when systems weren’t built for you. Together, they unpack authenticity, burnout, boundaries, and what happens when companies say they value “culture fit” but really mean “sameness.” Madison shares the story that sparked her journey toward radical authenticity — from code-switching and corporate conformity to refusing to straighten her hair for anyone again — and how that moment changed everything. She and Stacey get candid about navigating fear-based leadership, detaching self-worth from productivity, and finding joy when the world (and the workplace) keeps serving chaos. It’s real talk about identity, healing, and humanity at work — the messy, necessary kind that actually makes things better. Key Takeaways: Authenticity isn’t about performance — it’s about liberation. “Culture fit” is just code for exclusion; hire for value add. Fear-based leadership thrives because it protects power, not people. You can’t heal burnout inside the system that caused it. Detaching your worth from work is an act of resistance. Boundaries are a form of self-preservation, not rebellion. Leaders set the tone — your behavior teaches your team what’s safe. Joy at work isn’t frivolous; it’s fuel for survival. Therapy isn’t a luxury — it’s a leadership skill. Creating space for real humans makes better work, period. Timestamps: 00:00 — Why work shouldn’t send you to therapy 02:00 — How Madison learned to show up as herself 06:00 — The moment she stopped code-switching at work 10:00 — The myth of “authenticity” on social media 15:00 — Burnout, dopamine, and chasing the next thing 20:00 — Fear-based leadership and caring less (on purpose) 23:00 — Detaching identity from job titles 28:00 — Culture fit vs. value add: the truth 33:00 — Likability bias and who gets punished for honesty 36:00 — Leading with joy when everything’s on fire Top Keywords: authenticity at work, burnout recovery, fear-based leadership, work identity, culture fit vs value add, psychological safety, trauma-informed leadership, HR and mental health, joy at work, boundaries and burnout
Between layoffs, burnout, political chaos, AI anxiety, and the cost of living crisis, it’s no wonder employees aren’t okay. But if “not okay” has become the new normal, how do we lead, work, and stay human in the middle of it? In this episode of Toot or Boot, Stacey Nordwall is joined by Kat Kibben and Ryan-Mae McAvoy to explore the crises reshaping the modern workplace. Together, they dig into what’s behind the stats — from chronic fear and distraction to the way work has replaced community — and why “resilience” isn’t a cure for systemic dysfunction. The conversation goes deep on leadership, empathy, and accountability: why companies still reward the wrong traits in leaders, what a truly trauma-aware organization looks like, and how HR can create stability when the world won’t stop spinning. They talk about what healthy work could look like even when no one’s okay. Key Takeaways: Most employees are operating from chronic fear and instability — and pretending otherwise makes it worse. “Resilience” has become a buzzword that ignores systemic problems. Leadership starts with self-awareness and accountability, not policy. Work has replaced community — and it’s breaking people. Constant information flow keeps nervous systems on high alert. HR can help by creating clarity, consistency, and small certainties. Access to benefits ≠ real psychological safety; trust is built in action. The U.S. over-relies on employers to fill social safety gaps. Leaders need to slow down, ask more questions, and model boundaries. Optimism and connection are radical leadership tools in uncertain times. 00:00 — Welcome + why “employees are not okay” became a refrain 02:50 — The nonstop chaos economy: layoffs, fear, and instability 07:00 — Brene Brown, burnout, and the limits of empathy 11:40 — The trauma of layoffs and why we can’t grit through it 14:00 — Fear-based leadership and the dopamine trap of bad news 18:30 — Are workplaces actually built for resilience? 23:00 — Work as the new community (and why that’s dangerous) 26:30 — What we can learn from other countries’ systems 33:00 — Modern work as dependence: a new kind of slavery 35:30 — Redefining leadership: connection, courage, and curiosity Top Keywords: employee burnout, workplace mental health, HR leadership, resilience at work, trauma-informed leadership, workplace culture, psychological safety, layoffs and fear, nervous system regulation, future of work
The CEOs are not OK

The CEOs are not OK

2025-11-1149:50

Something strange is happening in the C-suite — and employees are the ones feeling it. In this fiery and funny episode of Toot or Boot, Stacey Nordwall is joined by Jessica Winder and Kim Rohrer to unpack a record-breaking trend: more CEOs have stepped down in 2025 than any year in recent history. They dig into why leaders are bailing, what’s really going on behind the “personal reasons” PR statements, and how the revolving door at the top is wrecking trust, culture, and stability across organizations. From “glass cliff” appointments to the “CEO gig economy,” the conversation is equal parts HR therapy and truth serum about power, privilege, and burnout at the top. The crew also looks ahead — asking what happens when nobody even wants to be in charge anymore. And yes, they go there: could AI actually replace a CEO? Key Takeaways: CEO departures hit a 20-year high — and “no reason given” often hides real turmoil. Interim CEOs and “fractional” leaders create confusion, not stability. Boards keep firing individuals instead of fixing systemic problems. The “glass cliff” still pushes women — especially Black women — into impossible roles. Employees feel the ripple effect: fear, fatigue, and lost trust. Leadership churn erodes culture faster than layoffs do. The next generation isn’t aspiring to lead — and that’s a warning sign. Burnout isn’t just for employees; executives are breaking too. AI “leaders” aren’t a solution — but the fantasy says a lot about disillusionment. The future of leadership requires re-imagining power, not recycling it. Timestamps: 00:00 — Welcome and introductions: why CEOs are “not okay.” 04:20 — The CEO exodus by the numbers — record turnover in 2025. 07:15 — Interim CEOs, scapegoating, and corporate gaslighting. 10:30 — Boards keep firing the wrong people. 13:00 — The “glass cliff” and why women say “I’m out.” 15:00 — What’s really behind “voluntary departures.” 20:30 — The shrinking pipeline for diverse leadership. 28:00 — Culture collapse: how constant CEO changes wreck teams. 33:00 — Loyalty vs. chaos: what employees should expect now. 36:00 — Can AI be your CEO? (We said it.) Top Keywords: CEO turnover, leadership instability, HR insight, glass cliff, burnout, workplace culture, board dynamics, interim CEO, employee trust, diversity in leadership
When politics and policy collide with people’s livelihoods, HR leaders are often the ones left cleaning up the mess. In this episode, Stacey sits down with fractional HR leaders Anessa Fike and Morgan Williams to unpack the chaos surrounding recent presidential proclamations on H-1B visas, the newly proposed “gold card” visa, and what happens when immigration policy turns into a political weapon. They share firsthand stories from the front lines of HR during both the 2016 and 2025 crises—when rushed visa restrictions sent companies into panic mode, disrupted families overnight, and exposed how little most Americans understand about how H-1Bs actually work. From wage suppression myths to talent pipeline realities, this conversation offers the clarity and context that global companies, startup founders, and HR practitioners need right now. Key Takeaways: What the $100K H-1B fee really means for employers. Why this proclamation mirrors the 2016 immigration chaos. The human toll on workers, families, and HR teams. Why H-1B holders aren’t “stealing jobs.” How global talent drives U.S. innovation. The ripple effect on startups, STEM, and tech. What HR leaders must do when layoffs involve visas. The uncomfortable truth about “gold card” visas. How power and privilege shape who gets to stay. Why HR’s role in political turbulence matters more than ever. Timestamps: 00:00 — Welcome + Why this conversation matters 02:40 — Breaking down the new H-1B rules 05:30 — Déjà vu: echoes of 2016 08:00 — Inside HR’s panic during sudden policy shifts 13:30 — The truth about wage suppression myths 18:20 — What H-1Bs reveal about global talent markets 23:40 — Layoffs, life disruption, and HR ethics 28:50 — How the $100K fee blocks smaller orgs 37:00 — Tech, innovation, and talent pipelines at risk 41:00 — “Gold card” visas and the politics of access
Black women are being pushed out of the U.S. workforce at alarming rates—and it’s not by choice. In this powerful episode of Toot or Boot, host Stacey Nordwall sits down with workplace equity expert T. Tara Turk-Haynes and communications leader and career strategist Cassandra Babilya to unpack how federal job cuts, dismantled DEI programs, and systemic neglect have created an economic crisis that reveals much more than the headlines. Together, they explore what this moment says about the state of work, leadership, and allyship—and what HR and business leaders can actually do to respond. Takeaways Black women’s unemployment rate has surged past 7%, the highest of any demographic group. Federal job cuts are erasing a long-standing path to middle-class stability for Black workers. The dismantling of DEI programs has disproportionately removed Black women from leadership roles. “Economic canary in the coal mine”: what happens to Black women first eventually affects everyone. Many former DEI and HR professionals are now turning to entrepreneurship out of necessity, not choice. Fear of “job hugging” and retaliation may be stifling allyship inside organizations. Mutual aid and microgrants are emerging as critical lifelines for displaced workers. Business leaders must proactively assess who’s being most affected by layoffs and hiring freezes. Individual action—referrals, donations, advocacy—still matters when sustained collectively. True allyship means staying present, vocal, and engaged when it’s no longer convenient. Chapters 00:00 – Opening: Black women and federal job cuts set the stage. 05:47 – Cassandra’s “gong” moment: realizing this isn’t a blip. 07:15 – Tara on being “pushed” into entrepreneurship. 10:35 – Why the silence from supposed allies feels like betrayal. 13:55 – The rise of Black women entrepreneurs as a survival strategy. 17:05 – Understanding why Black women are the canary in the coal mine. 21:09 – How layoffs in HR and DEI deepen inequality across the workforce. 29:10 – The erosion of collective bravery and the rise of isolation. 35:50 – Mutual aid and community action in the face of federal cuts. 43:22 – The call to HR: prove you’re human resources, not corporate defense. Resources: https://fortune.com/2025/08/15/black-female-leadership-future-ceos-erased-dei/ https://www.npr.org/2025/04/27/nx-s1-5349442/black-federal-employees-trump-cuts https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/05/agencies-majority-women-and-minority-workforces-are-some-hardest-hit-trump-staff-cuts-new-report-finds/405179/ https://19thnews.org/2025/07/black-women-unemployment-jobs-warning-sign/ https://www.msnbc.com/know-your-value/business-culture/300000-black-women-left-labor-force-3-months-s-not-coincidence-rcna219355 https://time.com/7315624/rising-unemployment-black-women-economy/ https://www.epi.org/blog/whats-behind-rising-unemployment-for-black-workers/ https://www.sheenmagazine.com/relief-is-resistance-the-state-of-women-relief-fund/
In this episode, we explore three critical workplace strategy topics: how effective leaders can minimize office politics through transparency, accountability, and encouraging diverse viewpoints—strategies that seem obvious yet many workplaces still struggle to implement; Moderna's innovative approach to merging their tech and HR departments under a single "chief people and digital technology officer" role, complete with over 3,000 custom GPTs, representing a thoughtful years-long integration rather than a knee-jerk AI adoption; and the challenges of scaling a business sustainably, where the advice to build systems for 10x capacity sounds great in theory but often conflicts with the reality that HR infrastructure typically lags behind growth, creating a delicate balance between building too little too late versus over-engineering for your current stage. Connect Katya Laviolette on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/katya-laviolette-6907b726/ Stacey Nordwall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles How Effective Leaders Minimize Office Politics Why Moderna Merged Its Tech and HR Departments Why Scaling a Business is the Hardest—and Most Important—Stage of Growth
This episode dives into why some CEOs are paying the price for walking back DEI, how the employer-employee relationship has fundamentally shifted, and the horrifying conditions faced by Meta’s outsourced content moderators. From strategic miscalculations to moral failures, we examine what these stories tell us about leadership, labor, and the values that shape today’s workplaces. Connect: With Anessa: On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anessafike/ On her website: https://www.fikeandco.com/ Her book: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-revolution-of-work-fuck-the-patriarchy-and-the-workplace-it-built-anessa-fike/21206822?ean=9781961347540&next=t With Stacey on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: How some corporations miscalculated the impact of abandoning DEI  Has the Labor Market changed or have employees? Meta faces Ghana lawsuits over impact of extreme content on moderators
In this episode, we explore Cake’s Body’s bold $36K childcare stipend, why the job market is suddenly so brutal for college grads, and what the WEF’s new report reveals about the steep decline in employee well-being. We break down what these headlines signal about where workplaces are headed—and what HR needs to be thinking about next. Connect: With Anessa: On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anessafike/ On her website: https://www.fikeandco.com/ Her book: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-revolution-of-work-fuck-the-patriarchy-and-the-workplace-it-built-anessa-fike/21206822?ean=9781961347540&next=t With Stacey on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Cakes Body’s $36K Child Care Credit Leads the Way in Affordable Child Care Planning for Employees Something Alarming Is Happening to the Job Market  World Economic Forum Warns Employee Well-Being Is Declining—and Costing Businesses Trillions
This week, we're diving into three concerning workplace trends: First, employee engagement is declining sharply, with managers under 35 and female managers leading this downward slide—potentially because they're caught in middle management roles with high responsibility but little decision-making power. Meanwhile, BNY Mellon is increasing its office mandate from three to four days weekly by September 2025, again bringing up the question of if RTOs are actually solving the challenges businesses are having. Finally, tech CEOs are raising alarms about candidates using AI to fake their way through remote job interviews—with Gartner projecting that by 2028, one in four global job applicants will be using AI-generated profiles, posing serious security risks beyond simple resume fraud. Connect: With Lee Rubin on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rubinl/ With Stacey Nordwall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Employee Engagement is Dropping and Managers are leading the slide BNY asks employees to return to office four days a week by September Fake job seekers are flooding U.S. companies that are hiring for remote positions, tech CEOs say
This week, we discuss why HR professionals are naturally positioned for C-suite operations roles, examining the journey of Hinge's Angel Franklin from CPO to COO and why this transition shouldn't be considered unusual. We also dive into MongoDB's approach to hybrid work models, and fascinating research on how job ad language may inadvertently attract candidates with narcissistic tendencies and what this means for recruitment strategies. Connect: with Steven Huang on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thestevenhuang/ or sign up for his newsletter: https://setthesetting.substack.com/ with Stacey Nordwall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Why it’s not far-fetched for HR pros to dream of being COO  Giving employees a choice when to be in the office  Why is your boss a narcissist? Blame the job ad that got them hired
This week, we dive into the real-world impacts of DEI rollbacks, workplace discrimination, and employee disengagement. We examine how Target faced boycotts and significant business impacts after eliminating DEI initiatives recently met with Rev. Al Sharpton to address the impacts of boycotts. We'll also explore troubling new research showing increased workplace discrimination against LGBTQ+ employees amid a record year of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation. Finally, we discuss the emerging concept of "quiet cracking" and what it reveals about the current state of workplace wellbeing and employee engagement. Connect: with Steven Huang on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thestevenhuang/ or sign up for his newsletter: https://setthesetting.substack.com/ with Stacey Nordwall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Rev Al Sharpton meets with Target CEO over halting of DEI initiative LGBTQ+ workers report more discrimination, less happiness at work What is ‘quiet cracking’? Worker disengagement has a new name
This week, we welcome Nathan Chung, Jessica Donahue, and Greer Procich for a critical conversation about workplace accessibility and inclusion. With collective experience in HR, cybersecurity, and disability advocacy, our panel examines how current workplace policies often overlook the experiences of disabled and neurodivergent employees. The conversation explores three major topics affecting the workplace: The surge in return-to-office mandates and their disproportionate impact on people with disabilities which is reversing progress that had been made in employment for people with disabilities. The potentially devastating implications of Texas v. Becerra, a lawsuit challenging Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the ripple effects of which could undermine fundamental disability rights in workplaces. Recent changes at the EEOC, including the halting of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination claims and the abandonment of existing lawsuits - as the EEOC continues to operate without a quorum. Our guests offer advice and insight for HR professionals navigating these challenges and advocating for truly inclusive workplaces.  Learn more about Rethink Ability: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/greerprocich_rethinking-disability-from-red-tape-to-real-activity-7310716858263908354-uJxk Connect: Nathan Chung: on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nc808/ on the Disability Disrupted podcast: https://www.youtube.com/@DisabilityDisrupted Jessica Donahue: on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jessica-e-donahue/ on her website: https://www.adjunctleadership.com/ Greer Procich: on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/greerprocich/ Stacey Nordwall: on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: 5 years into the remote work boom, the return-to-office push is stronger than ever—here's why  ‘Dangerous’ lawsuit could imperil disability rights, advocates say Andrea Lucas renominated to EEOC, pledges ‘evenhanded’ civil rights enforcement  Five years of remote work changed workplace accessibility. Employees with disabilities will feel its loss.
In this episode, we analyze new Glassdoor research suggesting employees are increasingly deprioritizing workplace relationships, questioning whether this shift stems from broader social disconnection or reflects changing priorities in a hybrid world. We also discuss a revealing Perceptyx survey showing that while 95% of HR teams are collecting employee feedback, only 27% feel confident they can act on it—highlighting the growing burnout crisis among HR professionals who are stretched too thin. Finally, we explore the controversy surrounding Meta's "do not rehire" list, examining the tension between standard HR offboarding practices and transparency in employment relationships.  Connect: Kim Minnick: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kim-minnick/ Stacey Nordwall: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Employees care less and less about workplace relationships, new research finds Stressed HR teams say they can’t take action on employee feedback  Meta keeps secret ‘do not rehire’ list of ex-employees — despite exceptional performance reviews: report
Kim Minnick joins this week as we dive into three fascinating workplace trends from around the globe. We examine Tokyo's move toward a four-day workweek aimed at addressing Japan's population crisis and work-life balance challenges, while questioning why it takes demographic emergencies to implement family-friendly policies. We also explore the "resignation by proxy" phenomenon emerging in Japan's hierarchical corporate culture. Finally, we unpack a thought-provoking UK tribunal case where an estate agent successfully sued after being assigned a lower-status desk, revealing how seemingly minor workplace arrangements can significantly impact employee roles and retention. Join us as we examine these developments and their implications for the evolving modern workplace. Connect: Kim Minnick: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kim-minnick/ Stacey Nordwall: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles: Tokyo is turning to a 4-day workweek in a desperate attempt to help Japan shed its unwanted title of ‘world’s oldest population’  Resignation By Proxy: A New Workplace Trend Leaders Should Watch Senior staff can sue if given ‘low status’ desk, UK tribunal rules
In this special April Fool’s Day episode, host Stacey Nordwall hands over the reins to co-producer Lexi Croswell for a fun twist on the usual format. Instead of tooting or booting HR headlines, Stacey and HR consultant Nadia Eran have to decide if the headlines are real or fake – and why!  Connect: Nadia Eran -> on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadiaeran/ Or her website Future in Work: https://futureinwork.com/ Lexi Croswell -> on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexiscroswell/ Or her website: https://www.alexiscroswell.com/services Stacey Nordwall -> On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/
Last week our team was at the Transform Conference in Las Vegas, connecting with HR practitioners and thought leaders. We decided to have some fun and do quick on the conference floor interviews with fellow attendees and friends of the pod. So this week we're spreading the fun and bringing you a special compilation episode of all of our interviews, which involve folks tooting your booting things about Vegas pop culture. And of course, as always, HR headlines. The audio was a bit tricky at times, so apologies in advance for that and for saying you heard it here at the end of pretty much every interview. I hope you enjoy. Our guests: Theresa Fesinstine: https://www.linkedin.com/in/theresafesinstine/ Nadia Eran: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nadiaeran/ Kim Minnick: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kim-minnick/ Rebecca Taylor: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rebeccataylor2/ Daniel Huerta: https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-huerta-mpl/ Stephen Huerta: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenhuerta/ Lia Seth: https://www.linkedin.com/in/liaseth/ Stefanie Fackrell: https://www.linkedin.com/in/stefaniefackrell-hr-rebel/ The headlines:  Accusations of Corporate Espionage Shake a Software Rivalry Cameo puts its money where its office is with new RTO policy Resignation By Proxy: A New Workplace Trend Leaders Should Watch Typing loudly, wearing AirPods: ‘taskmasking’ is how gen Z pretends to work at the office
We discuss a recent sex discrimination case where a male employee in a female-dominated workplace filed a claim after being excluded from awards with the announcement "it's not going to be any of the men." We explore the complex dynamics of being in the minority at work. Next, we analyze the growing trend of companies like Google and the Trump administration offering buyouts with an underlying message of "get on board or get out." What does this signal about workplace culture when organizations are explicitly prioritizing mission alignment over accommodating diverse perspectives? Finally, we question the emerging concept of "revenge quitting" - is this just a rebranding of employees setting reasonable boundaries by leaving toxic environments? We examine how companies are scrambling to prevent turnover, but seemingly don't want to acknowledge how this is the work of DEI and HR. Connect with DeMario: On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/demario-bell-7a510994/ Connect with Stacey: On LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/staceynordwall/ Articles Man loses sex discrimination claim after boss says ‘sorry boys’ at awards do Why Trump and Google are paying employees to quit and what it means for your business 5 ways employers can prevent employees from revenge quitting in 2025
loading
Comments