Trees in Space

Get ready for another brutally honest review as Jason and Nate tackle the 1981 horror classic, Halloween 2. This isn’t their first attempt—their initial review was lost to the void—but this time, nothing will stop them from breaking down Michael Myers' hospital rampage. Why this re-review happened and how recording mishaps impact the show The absurd logic and underpopulated setting of Haddonfield Memorial Hospital Unpacking plot holes, questionable character decisions, and Michael Myers' supernatural invincibility A look at standout kill scenes, behind-the-scenes inconsistencies, and misplaced suspense The final verdict: stump-worthy ratings, fan and critic review highlights, and whether it’s worth your time Don’t forget to comment, like, and subscribe for more movie dissections every Monday on Trees in Space!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the only podcast with roots in outer space and branches in the world of ridiculous cinema! This week, Jason and Nate boldly venture where no critics should ever have to go: the cinematic graveyard of 2018’s The VelociPastor. After unearthing this fossilized fever dream, the guys struggle to define what, exactly, they’ve watched—is it horror? Comedy? The missing link between “Dexter” and “Kung Pao: Enter the Fist?” One thing’s for certain: it’s so bad, it’s kind of perfect. Listen in as Nate and Jason recount the saga of a priest who, after a spiritual quest to “China” (read: a handful of backyard trees), gains the power to turn into a dinosaur and fight crime—guided by a wise (and, apparently, wonderful) hooker with a heart of gold. They’ll dissect the movie’s questionable FX, killer one-liners, and the surprising acting chops of a leading lady who might just be the film’s saving grace. Expect hot takes, laugh-out-loud moments, and shamelessly nitpicked movie magic—plus plenty of side-splitting reviews from audiences who either loved this absurdity or couldn’t survive the CGI. Whether you’re a disciple of the “so-bad-it’s-good” genre or just here for the banter, grab your communion wine—err, grape juice—and get ready for a review that’ll leave you howling like an unhinged White Ninja.

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the movie review podcast where we hack our way through films of all genres and tell you which ones are “worthy of the forest” and which deserve no more than a rotting stump. In this episode, hosts Nate and Jason bravely enter the woods of questionable horror logic as they revisit Friday the 13th Part 2—the 1981 (oops, Nate calls it 1982!) slasher sequel that brought Jason Voorhees out of the lake and onto dry land… despite having already killed him off in the original. The guys break down everything from confusing timelines (Was Jason supposed to be 12? 33? Bad at math? Yes!) to continuity errors that’ll make your head spin faster than a machete swing. They debate essential cinematic issues like: Did we really need that four-minute flashback? (Spoiler: no.) Is farmhand-strength Jason scary, or just a guy with a flour sack on his head who struggles with Paul in a fistfight? And what’s the deal with the world’s worst plumbing, cars that break down on cue, and counselors who apparently don’t notice their cars being towed away right in front of them? Expect a hilarious exchange about the film’s logic gaps, counting errors, brown underwear (seriously), which on-screen scares land—and which kills are strictly for the stunt bump. Plus: one host defends the movie’s place in the Friday the 13th mythos, while the other recommends it only as a form of light torture… for your least favorite sibling. Get ready, because this isn’t just a review—this is an autopsy with jokes, messy plot threads, and just enough campfire storytelling to make you paranoid the next time you hear a twig snap. Grab your hockey mask, fire up your skepticism, and join us for a romp through the hilariously flawed woods of Friday the 13th Part 2 on Trees in Space!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, where we bravely plow through every bizarre movie genre the universe can throw at us—armed only with questionable nostalgia, overly honest hot takes, and the kinds of jokes that only make sense to people who may or may not still be thirteen at heart. This week, your hosts Nate and Jason take a hilariously awkward deep dive into the cult-classic oddity that is Frankenhooker (1990). Imagine: a medical school dropout, a tragic lawnmower “accident,” a fiancée whose head ends up in a fish tank, and a super-convoluted plan to reassemble lost love with... let’s just call them “parts” from New York’s finest streetwalkers—and a lot of super crack. Yes, you read that right. Nate and Jason duke it out over whether Frankenhooker is a misunderstood B-movie treasure or a monstrous mishmash of questionable prosthetics and even more questionable plot choices. Expect breakdowns of the film’s delightfully terrible special effects, philosophical debates on purple hair, explosive reviews (literally... exploding people everywhere), and a heartfelt appreciation for practical effects over bad CGI—all with a splash of 90s VHS charm. By the end, you'll have heard five-star worship, one-star rants, and a ratings system so convoluted even Jason has trouble explaining the difference between “four trees and a stump” and “one tree with a stump.” If you’re in the mood for a review that's as weirdly captivating as the film itself, you’re in for a treat. So grab your remote-controlled lawnmower, pour one out for Elizabeth’s head, and get ready: it’s time for Trees in Space to go where no (sane) reviewer has gone before—into the wild, stitched-together world of Frankenhooker.

We’ve laced up for another week of movie magic, and this episode is packed with throwbacks, witticisms, and everything Robert Redford. On the latest episode of Trees in Space, Jason and Nate take on the 1992 hacker heist comedy-thriller, Sneakers. From its legendary cast to its very ‘90s depiction of tech, we cracked open what makes this cult classic (and maybe the occasional Volkswagen) tick.Here’s what you’ll uncover in this episode:5 Keys You'll Learn This Week:What Sets “Sneakers” Apart: Get a breakdown of the plot and why this hacker heist stands out among other 90s thrillers.Why the Cast Has Us Geeking Out: Jason and Nate wax poetic about legends like Redford, Sidney Poitier, Dan Aykroyd (in a role you might not expect), and a younger Ben Kingsley lookalike.Is It a Heist or a Laugh Attack? The hosts debate if “Sneakers” lands as a true thriller or if it’s more about clever one-liners and quirky team dynamics.Tech Talk – 90s Style: They question just how plausible the hacking and code-breaking tech really is, and whether you could, in fact, crawl through those drop ceilings (spoiler: don’t try this at the office).Nostalgia vs. New Eyes: Was this the “Ocean’s Eleven” before “Ocean’s Eleven”? How does it hold up decades later, and does the younger generation buy into the ‘92 hype?Fun Fact from the Episode:Did you know Dan Aykroyd’s conspiracy-loving character foreshadows his future gig as a paranormal/pseudoscience host on the History Channel? Only on Trees in Space do you get that kind of full-circle movie trivia!As always, Jason and Nate don’t entirely agree—was this a forest of movie greatness, or was it more like sitting on a lonely stump? Tune in for the banter, stay for the honest reviews, and learn why Robert Redford is your grandma’s George Clooney.Ready to join the hacking, high-jinks, AND hilarity?👉 WATCH THE FULL EPISODE ON YOUTUBEOr hit reply and tell us your favorite heist movie (bonus points if it includes a broken Volkswagen)!Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe—feed the aggregate monster!We’ll see you next week, and remember: in the world of Trees in Space, there are never too many secrets…unless you don’t press play.Thanks for being part of our movie-loving crew!The Trees in Space Team 🌲✨

Welcome back, space cadets! On this episode of "Trees in Space," your hosts Jason and Nate dive headfirst—boobs first?—into the wonderfully weird 1996 cult "classic," Barb Wire. That’s right, it’s Pamela Anderson in full pleather regalia, mysterious contracts about who can show what on screen, and a plot that somehow fuses Casablanca with post-apocalyptic biker chic and a dollop of Nazi cosplay for good measure. This week, Jason confesses he didn’t even realize Barb Wire was a comic book movie, while Nate admits he was way ahead of the curve—having watched it originally, although not as a fan of Pamela. (Apparently, blue-eyed blondes just remind him too much of his sister. Ew?) The duo tackles everything from the movie’s deeply confusing timeline (why does the "future" look like 1986?) to its smoking hot, gravity-defying fashion choices, to that age-old cinematic question: why can Pamela show all the boobage but everyone else is stuck with pasties? Was Barb Wire secretly trying to channel the classic romance of Casablanca? Did the plot get lost somewhere between the strip club and the retina scanner? And what exactly is “plot armor”—or maybe just plot underwear? Our fearless hosts dig through the darkness (literal and metaphorical), debate the acting chops of the cast (Pam’s not the worst! Who knew?!), and argue whether this movie deserves a full tree or just a lonely stump on their patented rating scale. If you’re ready for a hilariously honest breakdown of a “campy, breasty” sci-fi romp packed with flying bullets and questionable dialogue, tune in! And remember: they watch the trash so you don’t have to—or so you know exactly when to jump in for the wardrobe malfunctions. Strap in. It’s going to be a wild ride—pleather optional.

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast that reviews movies with all the seriousness of a lumberjack at a disco and the critical eye of a Russian mob enforcer with poor aim. This week, hosts Jason (not Statham, mind you) and a sniffly Nate tackle "A Working Man," the 2025 action flick that answers the age-old question: what happens if you want a Taken reboot but all you can get is Jason Statham, a white hard hat, and an indestructible motorcycle? In this episode, our hosts break down a movie so formulaic it might as well come with store-brand tomato sauce—plus a suspiciously high audience score and critics who are just as confused as our hosts about why 87% of people seem to love it. From mafia marksmanship that wouldn’t scare a stormtrooper, to plotlines abandoned so suddenly they need their own search party, nothing is safe from Jason and Nate’s gleeful chainsaw of a review. Was “A Working Man” an action masterpiece, or just another stump in the cinematic forest? Grab your snow tires and tune in for all the takes, all the groans, and all the convoluted metaphors, right here on Trees in Space!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast that reviews movies with the perfect blend of nostalgia, hot takes, and more than a few questionable jokes. In this episode, hosts Jason and Nate take a swing at the 1989 comedy classic "Major League"—but with a twist: one host has never actually seen the movie before, and the other was in high school when it came out (so cue the “back in my day” stories). Join the guys as they break down everything from Charlie Sheen’s wild haircut and Bob Uecker’s legendary one-liners, to why Cleveland stadiums proudly supported both baseball and football teams… and, of course, why Wesley Snipes was basically unrecognizable as a baby-faced no-name in this film. You’ll hear them debate whether Rachel Phelps, the villainous team owner, is really the bad guy or just a misunderstood business genius—and which of the many zany misfit players actually had the best redemption arc. They dive into fan reviews (both glowing and grumpy, and even one confused soul who thought The Rock starred in this), drop some behind-the-scenes trivia, and wrap it all up by rating the film with their unique "tree" system. If you've ever wondered how well Major League holds up or just want some baseball banter with your comedy, this episode’s got you covered. Grab your peanuts and Cracker Jacks, because this is one major league episode you won’t want to miss!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the only podcast where the forest might be alive—but your fish tank definitely isn’t safe from stunt doubles or Deuce Bigalow, Male Gigolo. This week, hosts Jason and Nate dive deep, or maybe just wade awkwardly, into the 1999 Rob Schneider “classic” (using that word as loosely as possible). They break down everything from $6,000 fish tank destruction, to naked aquarium cleaning, to wondering if you can actually use a fish tank cleaner as a stand-in plumber. As always, Jason and Nate dish on the best (and worst) jokes, question why Rob Schneider keeps getting leading roles (spoiler: nobody knows), and debate which scenes made them laugh versus which ones made them reconsider ever eating sushi—or touching food again. From side characters with narcolepsy and Bigfoot-sized feet to Norm Macdonald’s 30-second bartender cameo, they ask the hard questions: Is this movie more stump than grove? Ready for pies vs cakes and the Gobots version of Shallow Hal? Listen in for salty opinions, random cameos, and enough gigolos to make your high school guidance counselor blush—all on this episode of Trees in Space!

Welcome back to another episode of Trees in Space—the only podcast that asks, “What if your mom filled her empty nest... with your shirtless ex-boyfriend?” This week, Jason and Nate dive deep into the 2023 indie drama “Suze,” where an overbearing mom unexpectedly becomes caretaker to her daughter's freshly dumped, perpetually underdressed ex. Is it a heartfelt indie hit, a cringe-worthy cuddle-fest, or something in between?Our hosts bravely navigate through awkward pool scenes, existential Canadian geography questions, and a surprisingly robust debate about the correct pronunciation of “Suze.” They’ll break down the movie’s emotional highs and lows, from unwanted kisses to menopausal tea, share hilarious “did they really just say that?” moments, and even let ChatGPT review the film—because when there are no one-star reviews, you gotta get creative.So, grab your art house snacks and prepare for opinions as hot as a menopausal Canadian summer. Are you team “moving drama,” or team “awkward disaster”? Find out on today’s episode of Trees in Space!06:23 Park Meeting with Teacher Confrontation07:20 Awkward Family Encounter Scene12:01 Hidden Depths Revealed14:26 Menopausal Drama Unfolds19:58 "Flat Emotional Miss in 'Sue'"22:38 "Slow Burn with Unseen Surprises"24:52 "Rating Debate: Heart vs. Critique"

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast where movies are reviewed not just with stars, but with a whole system of forests, groves, and stumps! In this episode, Jason and Nate throw on their cowboy hats and jump behind the wheel for a wild ride through the 1977 classic Smokey and the Bandit. What happens when a runaway bride, a charismatic trucker, an army of beer-thirsty millionaires, and a hilariously relentless sheriff all meet on the open road? Apparently, a film that’s part cinematic masterpiece, part “did anyone even look at the script’s timeline?”Buckle up as the hosts geek out over everything from the legendary soundtrack that introduced the world to “Eastbound and Down,” to Burt Reynolds’ scene-stealing wardrobe choices (and his, um, “grain silo”). Along the way, they dissect mind-blowing continuity errors (cop car damage, now you see it, now you don’t!), CB radio logic that would make real truckers sob, and the undeniable charm of Jackie Gleason sweating through his sheriff’s uniform like every lawman’s fever dream.From deep nostalgia and questionable love scenes for the ladies, to impassioned debates about how many Trans Ams died for Hollywood’s sins, Jason and Nate leave no rubber unburned. Is this movie still a five-tree classic, or does it deserve to be left as a lonely stump? Join in for laughs, fun facts, and more chaos than a high-speed chase through Georgia. Let’s hit the road!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast where nostalgia and hot takes collide at lightspeed! This week, your galactic guides Nate and Jason become the first podcasters in the universe (probably) to review the brand new 2025 comedy sequel, Happy Gilmore 2. That’s right—Adam Sandler’s back on the green, and this time it’s for his daughter’s ballet tuition, not grandma’s house! Join us as Nate and Jason marvel at de-aged faces (hello, digital wizardry!), reminisce about pop culture icons lost this week, and debate the mysterious logistics behind Connecticut’s alleged alligator population. Plus, they tackle burning questions like: Why pour booze into a trash bag? Which hole has the flaming sand trap? And does anyone really need to see flashbacks if they've streamed the original twenty times already? From cameos galore (Eminem! Steve Buscemi! Wrestlers playing Sandler’s kids!) to questionable math on golf tuition, we break down the fan service, cringe, and laughs—all while dodging more spoilers than golf balls at a charity Pro-Am. Was it a triumphant sequel worthy of a Happy dance, or just another hacky nostalgia cash-in? Grab your cucumber flask and tune in to find out: Happy Gilmore 2 is teeing up on Trees in Space!00:00 Movie Preview and Celebrity Losses04:22 Humorous Movie Praise06:43 Mystery of Happy's Tee Box10:55 Mystery of Alligators in Connecticut13:38 Nostalgic Cemetery Fight18:39 Nostalgic Comedy Well-Received23:05 Rising Film Score Debate24:40 Disjointed Plot with Convenient Resolution27:49 Happy Gilmore 2 Review#HappyGilmore2 #adamsandler #happygilmore #comedy nostalgia, golf movies, Shooter McGavin, John Daly, cameos, celebrity deaths, Ozzy Osborne, Hulk Hogan, fan service, movie reviews, Rotten Tomatoes, movie ratings, de-aging effects, sports announcers, family casting, Netflix, flashbacks, montages, Maxi Golf, alligators, celebrity guest stars, fan reactions, bad acting, plot holes, comedy tropes, movie soundtracks, Steve Buscemi

Welcome back to Trees in Space, where movie reviews grow wild and the comedy is always in full swing! In this episode, Jason and Nate tee off on the 1996 slapstick sports comedy Happy Gilmore, starring Adam Sandler as the hockey reject who takes the golf world by storm—all to save his grandma’s house. Get ready for a play-by-play on epic fistfights with Bob Barker, infamous golf course antics, and more moments that will have you quoting, “You shoulda been standing there!” Whether you love golf, can’t get enough Adam Sandler, or just want to relive the glory days where the only thing more broken than Happy’s clubs is his short game, this episode is for you.Jason and Nate dig deep into the movie’s hilarious one-liners, nitpick the wild editing errors, and debate whether Happy Gilmore deserves a full forest of praise or just a lonely little stump to sit on. Plus, they tackle the critics, the fan reviews, and ask the really important questions—like, should a classic Volkswagen Beetle spontaneously combust on the fairway? And, can anyone survive getting hit in the head with a baseball at close-range on a children’s batting cage?So grab your clubs (preferably not wooden ones), buckle up for nostalgia, and find out if this is Adam Sandler’s best comedy—or just a Caddyshack wannabe with a wicked slapshot. Don’t forget to stick around for the hosts’ tree ratings and their signature blend of hot takes, deep cuts, and a little bit of breakfast trash talk.

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast where hosts Jason and Nate boldly swim through the treacherous waters of movie genres, armed only with hot takes, nostalgia goggles, and questionable opinions. This week, they're taking on the granddaddy of all shark movies—Steven Spielberg’s 1975 classic, Jaws. And trust us, they're not afraid to wade into controversial territory: is it a thriller, a horror, or just responsible for traumatizing an entire generation of beachgoers? In this episode, Jason and Nate debate ratings (is it PG-13, R, or “Parent Please Don’t Let Your Seven-Year-Old Watch This”?), drop fun facts about shooting locations (spoiler: Martha’s Vineyard, but someone definitely missed the lighthouse), and question the feasibility of building a steel shark cage with nothing but a nervous marine biologist and a Phillips head screwdriver. They bond over the exceptional audio engineering (because you know those seagulls were NOT in the budget), nitpick 1970s parenting, continuity errors with buoys, and marvel at one legendary drunken monologue about the USS Indianapolis. Throw in some passionate reviews from both ends of the spectrum, classic one-liners, and a new appreciation for strong movie wives, and you’ve got an episode that’ll make you think twice before saying, “Let’s go for a swim.” So whether you’re here for the shark attacks, the hot takes, or just to find out why everyone on Amity Island looks 60, grab your lifejacket and tune in for this fin-tastic episode of Trees in Space!

Welcome back to Trees in Space! In this hilarious episode, Jason and Nate dive headfirst into the 1996 comedy “Sgt. Bilko” (or as Jason struggles to remember, definitely not “Blinko”). Picture this: Tony Stark’s charm, Ferris Bueller-style shenanigans, a scheming master sergeant, and Steve Martin at the wheel—what could go wrong? Well, apparently not much, because both hosts loved it so much, they watched it twice.With a combo of insider Army experience and a deep appreciation for absurd one-liners, Jason and Nate break down all the military mayhem, from professional-grade uniform patches to questionable motorpool activities, and even the accurate aroma of a muddy obstacle course. They debate everything from the authenticity of the Army depicted (realistic… except, maybe, for the roulette tables in the barracks), to whether Steve Martin is comedy royalty or a “disgrace” depending on which internet reviewer you ask.Along the way, you'll get quick-fire rundown of glowing and groaning audience reviews, thoughts on why critics got it totally wrong, and plenty of speculation about the original TV show. Jason dishes out a rare four-tree rating, while Nate can’t bring himself to go higher than three trees and a stump—seriously, get your forestry scoring chart ready.Bottom line: If you love witty banter, movie nostalgia, and military mischief—all filtered through the lens of two guys who’ve actually lived the Army life—this is the episode for you. Buckle up, because on Trees in Space, you’re always just a one-liner away from a good time.

Welcome back to another jam-packed edition of your favorite movie newsletter—where we climb up the cinematic redwood, hack at some plot branches, and occasionally fall off the stump of disbelief. This week, your hosts Jason and Nate have endured serious bodily harm (vicariously) all for… Novocaine (2025). Yeah, that’s right: action, comedy, and more anatomical confusion than your last trip to WebMD.Quick Recap: What Even Is Novocaine? If you thought the only people who couldn’t feel pain were Marvel villains or your ex during your breakup speech, think again! Novocaine introduces us to Jack Quaid’s character, an assistant bank teller with a rare condition—and by “rare,” we mean, apparently, he skips chewing solid foods and is maybe, possibly, sexually confused (not his fault; blame the writers). His dream girl, played by the formidably forward Amber Midthunder, gets kidnapped, and our hero must use his “superpower” (read: dangerous medical liability) to rescue her.Plot Points That Make Us Say “Wait, What?”Jack Quaid’s character can’t feel pain, but can he feel… pleasure? Pressure? The burning sadness of eating hot sauce shots and not knowing if you should be aroused or afraid? The debate raged on.The “romance” escalates fast. Our hosts wonder: why WOULDN’T you say yes to a date with Amber Midthunder? (Sidebar: Note to audience—never go to the bathroom during a date. It’s the fastest way to lose your shot, hot sauce or not.)The bad guys are so bad at shooting in the first act, we think they trained under Stormtrooper correspondence courses. By the finale, though, they’re nailing headshots like Olympic marksmen. Pick a lane, fellas.Apparently, getting arrows through thighs, compound fractures, and tattooing addresses into your palm is survivable. But chew carefully—an errant carrot, and you’re done for

This week, we donned our green tights (it’s a podcast, you can’t prove we didn’t), cranked up the Mel Brooks, and laughed our way through the 1993 cult classic Robin Hood: Men in Tights. Yes, THE movie that taught us all the real look of a chastity belt (which may or may not require a locksmith and a tetanus shot). 🎙️On This Episode: We plot our course through the forest of slapstick jokes and musical numbers, wrestling with everything from medieval metal underwear to whether Patrick Stewart, as King Richard, has the power to knight another knight—or just act very, very British. 🌳5 Keys You’ll Learn This Week:Mel Brooks Movie Math: Why Jason prefers his Mel Brooks’ movies with fewer spoofs and more cowboys… and why Men in Tights sparks family feuds over which Brooks film reigns supreme. Dave Chappelle’s Big Screen Launch: Discover why we can’t believe the original movie synopsis left out Chappelle (Achoo…Bless you!), and how he stole the show with both sneezes and style.The Absurd Science of Chastity Belts: Ever wondered how a 17th-century chastity belt worked, or how to pee in one? So did we. And we had way too much fun not figuring it out. Patrick Stewart’s Knightmare: Can a knight knight another knight? We put on our tinfoil armor and try to break the code—Nate’s “ipso facto” theory included.Spoof Logic Explained (Kinda): Why the Sheriff of Rottingham’s backwards wordplay is the linguistic gymnastic event you never knew you needed, and why sometimes, you shouldn’t get your movie history from Jason. 🌟Fun Fact from the Episode: One listener reminisced about seeing this movie in the cinema with their family… right as the WHOLE ROW of seats collapsed backwards! Physical comedy wasn’t just on the screen—we hope they got a refund and some free popcorn. 🎬 Outtro: This episode, we weighed the critics (42%... ouch!) against the fans (81%—vindication!), and threw in a discussion on the laws of Robin Hood archery contests just for good measure. Does Men in Tights still make you giggle, groan, or snore? Jason nearly set a world record for “most stumps given,” while Nate remains forever haunted by visions of Princess Bride déjà vu. 👇 Call to Action! Ready for some classic Mel Brooks goofiness and hot takes on medieval fashion? Hit up Trees in Space 1 on YouTube, drop us a comment with your favorite Men in Tights moment, and don’t forget to subscribe for weekly laughs (and questionable history lessons). Catch you next time—same tree, same space!

Welcome back to another episode of Trees in Space! This week, your intrepid hosts Nate Hankson and Jason Smith take a deep (and hilarious) dive into the 2025 unrated horror thriller, Popeye the Sail Man—yes, you heard that right. Our hosts bravely subject themselves to an indie film where the world’s most famous spinach-chomping sailor gets a terrifying (and somewhat grotesque) horror makeover.Join Nate and Jason as they ponder important questions, like: Why is an abandoned spinach canning factory only shut down 20 years ago? Is eating canned spinach a legitimate superpower, or just a risky dietary choice? Why do so many random plot elements—including a busty realtor and a questionable abusive boyfriend—feel like they wandered into the wrong movie? And most importantly, can you really rip someone’s head off by their hair (spoiler: you can’t)?With plenty of laughs, genuine confusion, and a handful of surprisingly thoughtful critiques about lighting, acting, and practical effects, Nate and Jason guide you through all nine (or is it ten?) bodies in this bloody spinach-fest. Stick around for their favorite five-star and one-star audience reviews, some wild crossover movie ideas (Popeye vs. Pooh, anyone?), and their final verdicts—will this flick be the tree, the stump, or just trip over its own roots?If you’re ready for more tangents, brutal honesty, and a few gags about sausagey special effects, hit play on this week’s episode of Trees in Space!

Welcome back to Trees in Space, the podcast where we boldly go where no reviewer has gone before—through every movie genre, fueled by fan opinions, questionable nostalgia, and our own hot takes. This week, hosts Jason and Nate plunge headfirst into the chaotic world of slapstick summer camps with the 1987 comedy classic "Ernest Goes to Camp," starring the one and only Jim Varney. Ever wondered what would happen if the Three Stooges all shared one body and became a well-meaning but utterly incompetent camp counselor? Spoiler alert: chaos, property damage, and questionable adult supervision abound. Join us as Jason and Nate dissect this “disasterpiece” of misfit mayhem, discuss the many stereotypes that flew under the radar in the '80s, debate whether turtles falling from the sky is a bad omen or just Monday morning, and try to figure out if sharp objects plus slapstick ever equals good life advice. Is "Ernest Goes to Camp" worthy of a mighty forest of cinematic greatness, or does it deserve to be chopped down to a lonely stump? Does it entertain the adults, or is it strictly a “put this on for your five-year-old grandkid” situation? And what’s with those recurring gags about ladders, braces, and suspiciously well-dressed delinquents? Buckle up—there’s plenty of heart, a fair bit of heroics, and a whole lot of Jim Varney getting into trouble. Plus, fan reviews, one-star zingers, and enough tangents to fill a canoe. Dive in and decide with us: is this a camp classic or just another lost marshmallow in the fire? 00:00 Ernest Goes to Camp Review06:27 Kids' Impressive TP Build08:20 Unexpected Movie Enjoyment10:21 Grandfather's Intentions Uncertain14:59 "Quiet Racism Justification"20:24 "Revisiting 80s Comedy: Ernest"23:11 Movie Review Debate: Share Opinions Ernest Goes to Camp,Jim Varney, Three Stooges, slapstick comedy, 1980s movies, camp counselor, juvenile delinquents, Bad News Bears, movie review, Trees in Space podcast, movie ratings, Rotten Tomatoes, audience scores, camp setting, corporation takeover, kids' movies, movie stereotypes, representation in film, racial stereotypes, memorable movie quotes, movie gags, running jokes, vehicle scenes, Lyle Alzado, movie villains, nurse character, Native American character, emotional moments, five-star reviews, one-star reviews, camp pranks