DiscoverWSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
Claim Ownership

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

Author: Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

Subscribed: 3,461Played: 141,794
Share

Description

From the award-winning opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal, Paul Gigot, Kim Strassel and Bill McGurn discuss the latest from Washington. Get critical perspective and the analysis you need on developments from the nation’s capital. Join them every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday.
165 Episodes
Reverse
Will slow growth defeat Trump in 2020?Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Trump, China trade and Hong Kong.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Is Joe Biden too old to be President?Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
President Trump continues to respond to the mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Potomac Watch podcast: Race rhetoric in the presidential contest. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Will anything change after the weekend's mass shootings? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Democratic Campaign

The Democratic Campaign

2019-08-0200:24:03

The Democratic campaign after round two of debates.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Radicals Vs. Pragmatists

Radicals Vs. Pragmatists

2019-07-3100:24:471

The radicals vs. the pragmatists at the first Democratic debate.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Previewing the Democratic debate and Trump vs. Baltimore.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Democratic Party fight over impeachment continues.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
loading
Comments (16)

Ken Feindt

Wall Street Journal editorial board... do nothing about gun violence cause it's a slippery slope to taking them all away.. they never mention the victims rights to life or the military style weapons. Get some guts WSJ or continue to be part of the problem and not the solution

Aug 6th
Reply

Santiago

Ken Feindt yes, I agree with you

Aug 7th
Reply

Philip Hoskinson

Where do they find these idiot "experts" to weigh in? Swamp rats.

Jun 22nd
Reply

Joey Lira

Mayor Pete is the leader this country needs right now.

Apr 26th
Reply

Peter Chaloner

"You can't underestimate the impact." Means: no matter how little important you think it is, it is even LESS important than that. Opposite of meaning intended. Ignorance.

Mar 29th
Reply

Shannon Zahuranec

aww MN jkmj

Mar 26th
Reply

Rod Murray

always enjoy the topics, thank you!

Mar 21st
Reply

Peter Chaloner

"Some of them could have went to" says the graduate. Proof of the worthlessness of modern college education in the white trash Republic.

Mar 13th
Reply

Peter Chaloner

Repeal the stupid Second Amendment now.

Feb 27th
Reply

Hector Soler

you guys are in a coma

Feb 7th
Reply

Peter Chaloner

Uhh ah uuhh ahhh Master of the glottal fry Paul, not content to waste our time with his uuhh aahh uhs, brings on a guest whose uhh ahh uuuuhhhh glottal fries match his own. EDIT THESE FRIES OUT. Or else recruit non-brain-damaged speakers.

Feb 6th
Reply

Peter Chaloner

Uh ah uh eeeeh uhh.... Why not employ a presenter who is not brain-damaged and can speak English fluently?

Feb 2nd
Reply

Jeffery H

This episode bothers me. Lots of shade thrown at FBI and its intent without dealing with substance and accusations or evidence. I normally enjoy your podcast, but I think you need an opposing viewpoint on this subject. You are not balanced on this issue. I would prefer to see a point for point on evidence not intent or who brought evidence. You guys talk more about Steel dossier than any of the substance of investigation.

Jan 18th
Reply

Peter Chaloner

Ey aa eh aa ey aaaah... how about using a presenter who is not brain-damaged?

Nov 26th
Reply

Ragnar Danneskjöld

It's about time the Fed was dealt with.

Oct 13th
Reply

Patrick Glang

This podcast is very clearly biased. They lean hard Republican and tend to only talk about issues that are easy to frame in a pro conservative message. The production quality could be better and it's honestly boring. Most of the episodes are just commentary with almost no analysis of actual data or polling. There are much better podcasts out there. I'm very disappointed with this production.

Oct 9th
Reply
loading
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store