The Michael Decon Program

EP.656Michael lets Kari talk. Kari's path in was ordinary: childhood sightings, Star Trek, watching 9/11 as a kid, InfoWars at ten, the 2012 rabbit hole by fourteen. A 2011-2012 sighting of five to seven silent black triangles in V-formation pushed Kari into the literature. Kari put £200 into Steven Greer's Sirius Kickstarter, told friends, and never received the DVD or shirt. Alfred Webre's reporting later claimed production money went to Greer's lifestyle. Chronically ill and bedbound, Kari found Gaia, absorbed David Wilcock and Corey Goode without critical thought, and lost friendships over it. Kari left the scene (possibly) and is now a Buddhist focused inward. The second half draws a hard line between ufology (Dolan, archives, real investigators) and ufotainment (content mills that recycle debunked stories).

EP.655Friday night, the planets aligned, the airports started shutting down, and three men with nothing to lose pointed a microphone at the machinery. This is the one you send to the friend who still thinks the red team is coming to save him.Michael opens the show by declaring the whole thing a legal liability, and then it goes exactly where you'd expect: pit bulls, panties, Indian men on the warpath, and a fight over whether a man's voice is real or not. Victor Hugo Jr. gonzo artist, satirist, the man who got blacklisted for telling the truth about General Michael Flynn and then got extorted for his own artwork over it is in the building. He explains exactly what happens when you step off the script: the death threats, the censorship on the "free speech" platforms, and the Scottish Rite show that got yanked the moment he refused to join the club.Alan Berman the mind behind the open-source power map at moketchups.com brings the receipts underneath the jokes. Technocracy Inc. and the 1930s blueprint for rule by engineers. Musk's grandfather. The Club of Rome. Maxwell's demon and the sorting system quietly deciding who gets the resources and who pays for them. Why you're allowed to talk about people and events but never about where the money actually flows. And why the UFO disclosure, the AI arms race, and the Iran drums all resolve into the same room.Along the way: Charlie Kirk and whether the footage holds up. Pompeii's brothel menu and the guy who died mid stroke. An OJ era threesome that saved a marriage. The Chinese honey trap, red light districts, and why billionaires can't pick a ten. Kung fu zombie Jesus. Cow anus wealth gods. The human centipede that is AI training on its own output. And a genuinely unresolved argument about whether this is a prison planet or just a poorly run apartment building we should fix instead of escape.They offend everybody. Twice. Michael warns you upfront that no one is responsible for what you're about to hear.He was right.

EP.654Journalist and author Ken Silva joins Michael Decon for a candid conversation about the assassination attempts against Donald Trump and the unanswered questions driving his reporting. Drawing from his book, The Trump Assassination Plots: What the Investigations Missed and Why It Matters, Silva discusses the Butler rally shooting, the security failures surrounding it, and why his initial suspicions about multiple shooters changed as he examined the evidence.The conversation explores Thomas Crooks’s background, his academic ambitions, and the contrast between his everyday life and the violent online comments Silva attributes to him. Decon and Silva examine the gaps in the public record, question the Secret Service’s handling of the rally, and discuss whether the failures reflect institutional incompetence or something more. Silva also explains why he rejects claims that the shooting was staged while acknowledging the limits of what his investigation has established.Beyond Butler, Decon and Silva turn their attention to political loyalty, media credibility, and the business of shaping public opinion. Silva reflects on his experience appearing with Tucker Carlson, while both men question how much prominent commentators are guided by conviction, audience demand, or commercial incentives. From distrust of political parties to the challenge of separating evidence from speculation, this episode offers an unfiltered discussion of power, accountability, and the questions that remain after a defining moment in American politics.

EP.653Join Michael Decon and Myke Hideous for a live edition of The Michael Decon Program, where election fallout is just the beginning. Fresh off the midterms, Michael shares his surprise at the Republican losses, while Myke brings his own perspective to a lively discussion about politics, mainstream media, and the narratives shaping public opinion.Then, the conversation shifts to internet culture before taking an eerie detour into Michael’s experience at a reportedly haunted mansion. Settle in for spirited disagreements, unexpected turns, and a story that takes the night well beyond politics.

EP.652John Hamer returns to The Michael Decon Program for a conversation about power, public trust, and the experiences that led him to question conventional accounts of history and science.Hamer traces his interest in alternative research to a story friends told him after Princess Diana’s death an account he says prompted years of investigation and eventually a writing career. From there, Michael and John explore a recurring theme in Hamer’s work: his belief that governments, media, and organized religion use fear to influence public behavior. They discuss war warnings, emergency preparedness, their experiences during the COVID era, and the distinction between personal spirituality and institutional religion.Apollo skepticism and a disputed chapterThe conversation turns to Hamer’s latest book, One Giant Lie to Mankind, co-written with Alistair Neal, which challenges the accepted account of the Apollo missions and Moon landings. Hamer explains how their collaboration began and describes the research he says informed the book.Michael also raises allegations by Jay Weidner concerning material in one chapter. Hamer acknowledges including material without checking its original source or crediting Weidner, says the omission was unintentional, and states that he apologized and is revising the book to remove the disputed passage. The discussion presents Hamer’s response; it does not independently establish the full extent of the overlap or resolve the dispute.