Claim OwnershipThe Street Epistemology Podcast
Subscribed: 441Played: 21,624
Subscribe
© All rights reserved
Description
Learn more at streetepistemology.com
477 Episodes
Reverse
The Street Epistemology International Board of Directors hosts their second SE Community Townhall to address concerns and answer questions from members of the Street Epistemology community.
You can support or learn more about Street Epistemology International here: https://streetepistemology.com/sei
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Charlie and David use Street Epistemology to explore Charlie's confidence that Charlie has no unconscious bias during the Sound Epistemology Adventure Tour.
Watch video of talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ_loUAl1r4
Sound Epistemology YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/SoundEpistemology
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Take the FREE Street Epistemology course here:
https://www.navigatingbeliefs.com/offers/oHkNXj62/checkout
Date Recorded: 20 February 2024
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Melanie Trecek-King from Thinking is Power interviews Anthony Magnabosco about Street Epistemology, critical thinking, education, and many other fascinating topics.
Watch video of talk here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIb_rBiZxLg
Thinking is Power Website:
https://thinkingispower.com/
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Take the FREE Street Epistemology course here:
https://www.navigatingbeliefs.com/offers/oHkNXj62/checkout
Date Recorded: 20 February 2024
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 20 March 2024
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Take the FREE Street Epistemology course here:
https://www.navigatingbeliefs.com/offers/oHkNXj62/checkout
Street Epistemology practitioner and Executive Director of Street Epistemology International Anthony Magnabosco takes questions from members of a popular Street Epistemology Discord server during his fourth Ask Me Anything.
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Audio correction provided by Philipp Grzemba.
Narration provided by AZ.
Alex führte im Januar 2022 ein Gespräch mit seinem Freund Marcus über dessen Überzeugung: „Alles ist mit allem verbunden“.
Anstatt mit ihm zu diskutieren, verwendete Alex die Gesprächsmethode „Sokratischer Weg“ (engl. „Street Epistemology“), um zu verstehen, wie Marcus zu seiner Überzeugung gelangt ist.
In diesem Review-Video schauen wir uns das Gespräch gemeinsam an und analysieren, wie gut er sich an die Regeln des Sokratischen Wegs gehalten hat, was gut lief und was er hätte besser machen können.
Im Panel waren:
Alex
Carl
Gerald (Ascendancer)
Janosch (Der_Prometheus)
Rene
Vielen Dank an alle, die Teil der deutschsprachigen Community sind!
https://sokratischer-weg.de/
kontakt@sokratischer-weg.de
Watch review video here: https://youtu.be/9Vm7H5Vpi7o
Watch original interview here: https://youtu.be/YCFI9Lkpxgw
Street Epistemology Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 5 February 2024
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Street Epistemology practitioner and Executive Director of Street Epistemology International Anthony Magnabosco takes questions from members of a popular Street Epistemology Discord server during his fourth Ask Me Anything.
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Mark and David sit in front of the rooster and discuss where SE is today, the Sound Epistemology Adventure Tour, Hidden Claim SE, Claimless SE, and how we want to be remembered.
To support the tour, donate here:
https://venmo.com/u/tex21122002
PayPal email: tex21122002@yahoo.com
Date Posted: 14 October 2023
Watch video of discussion here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV_mkf0Vzf0
David's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SoundEpistemology
Mark's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/beingreasonable
For more information about Street Epistemology check out
https://streetepistemology.com/
The Street Epistemology International Board of Directors hosts their first SE Community Townhall to address concerns and answer questions from members of the Street Epistemology community.
Navigating the Evolution of Street Epistemology
https://www.patreon.com/posts/96505475
You can support or learn more about Street Epistemology International here: https://streetepistemology.com/sei
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Kathy and David experiment with Hidden Claim Street Epistemology to explore Kathy's confidence in Kathy's hidden claim during the Sound Epistemology Adventure Tour.
Watch video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Dpg_SZC54
To support the tour, donate here:
https://venmo.com/u/tex21122002
PayPal email: tex21122002@yahoo.com
Standout videos, chosen monthly by Street Epistemology International, earn the title of Video of the Month. These videos are highlighted on the SE website's homepage, and creators can add a special badge to their video thumbnail. These videos receive promotion on social media, enhancing visibility and recognizing creators. Excludes Experimental SE videos.
Link to the Video of the Month Playlist: https://tinyurl.com/sevotm-playlist
The views expressed (or not expressed) here do not necessarily represent those of Street Epistemology International.
Date Recorded: 5 December 2023
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Street Epistemology practitioner and Executive Director of Street Epistemology International Anthony Magnabosco takes questions from members of a popular Street Epistemology Discord server during his third Ask Me Anything.
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 29 November 2023
Watch Video of Talk here: https://youtube.com/live/hdk4ecEGyZ0
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Members of the Navigating Beliefs team provide some behind-the-scenes insights in the writing of 'Module 2: Why Use Street Epistemology?'.
Now available! Free! Sign up here:
https://navigatingbeliefs.com/
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 22 November 2023
Watch Video of Talk here: https://youtube.com/live/W9Te5mhlCrg
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Members of the Navigating Beliefs team provide some behind-the-scenes insights in the writing of 'Module 1: What is Street Epistemology?'.
Now available! Sign up here:
https://navigatingbeliefs.com/
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 15 November 2023
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
The course creators and members of the SE community celebrate the release of the first phase of the FREE Street Epistemology self-directed course called Navigating Beliefs: A Learning Course for Rational Conversations.
Now available! Sign up here:
https://navigatingbeliefs.com/
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 5 October 2023
Street Epistemology-Related Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Street Epistemology practitioner and Executive Director of Street Epistemology International Anthony Magnabosco takes questions from members of a popular Street Epistemology Discord server during his second Ask Me Anything.
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by AZ.
Date Recorded: 22 May 2022
Date Released: 22 May 2022
Watch video of discussion here: https://youtu.be/ECZwRTdZNA8
Inspire Reflection's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/InspireReflection
Thank you to Anthony for being such a generous interview partner. This was my second interview with Anthony as the first one had major audio problems and I am very grateful to Anthony for giving me the chance to take another swing at it.
Anthony's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCocP40a_UvRkUAPLD5ezLIQ
Street Epistemology:
https://www.youtube.com/user/StreetEpistemologist
- - - -
For more information about Inspire Reflection and its sister project Deviant Robot checkout
https://deviantrobot.com
- - - -
Please be respectful to my conversation partners in the comments. They may not be used to expressing there views so please try and exercise the principle of charitable interpretation.
- - - -
Inspire Reflection Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/InsReflect
Deviant Robot Website - https://deviantrobot.com
Deviant Robot YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/deviantrobot
Deviant Robot Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/thedeviantrobot
Deviant Robot Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/deviantrobot
Deviant Robot Discord - https://discord.gg/7t8xNEBk3A
Street Epistemology Website - https://streetepistemology.com/
Street Epistemology YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/user/StreetEpistemologist
Street Epistemology Discord - https://discord.gg/streetepistemology
1Date Recorded: 13 June 2022
Watch video of discussion here: https://youtu.be/-6yH6eUmIEY
Eddie - Deep Discussions
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtftwuFFsiXLkzmpWPncd5w
Eddie's video using SE with his young daughters:
https://youtu.be/UAE9GXo57X8
Evitable's 'Joe Rogan knows how to talk to kids.' mashup: https://youtu.be/ZOd9VvvH2IQ
Diamond - Diamond Discourse
https://www.youtube.com/c/DiamondDiscourse
Bob - Mortgage Hill Musings
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQU9GcG93HyDa4oV_TbO9vQ
Charlie Brown video:
https://youtu.be/iE6SgMma7LE
Noella and Hafsa (Parentage) video:
https://youtu.be/qA4Vkn3iJi0
Simon - Austrathist
Some discussion points we address:
Adaptations/modifications of SE when talking to children
Informed consent
Goals/purpose
Failures/successes using SE with children
Advice for people new to SE
Your comments and feedback are welcome!
For more information about Street Epistemology check out
https://streetepistemology.com/
If you happen to be in the Salt Lake City area consider joining my SE Meetup group where we get together to study and practice Street Epistemology
https://www.meetup.com/street-epistemology-salt-lake-city
Date Recorded: May 16, 2022
Watch video of discussion here: https://youtu.be/wgQntkr3sNI
This is a conversation with women who are active in the Street Epistemology community.
Safety? Benefits? Concerns?
We cover lots of topics in less than an hour!
My guests for this panel discussion are Jules, Jenny, Karin, and Sheryl. Each of us have different experiences with Street Epistemology, and it was fun to compare and contrast notes, and get several perspectives!
Jules B's paper:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5McXU4VBFsjH2uBABFtfd34ZI5DcJXb/edit
Sheryl's website:
www.sherylforsouthdakota.com
Street Epistemology course:
https://streetepistemology.com/learning-course
Salt Lake City Meetup group:
https://www.meetup.com/street-epistemology-salt-lake-city/?_cookie-check=JaicIoqPXecS1BEi
Lisa's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMSInIbBclvxlif4GiUBUA
We address the questions:
What is Street Epistemology?
Why do you think SE is a valuable skill to learn?
Why do you think SE is primarily practiced by men?
Are there any unique concerns or benefits for women in SE?
How can we get more women involved with SE?
What personal successes have you had using SE?
Comments welcome
Constructive criticism always welcome
Intro narrated by Apollos.
Will (Inspire Reflection), Nathan (Abstract Activist), and Chucky (I Hear You), take your questions and comments about SE, and your concise, clear, genuine, and interesting claims to practice SE with.
Watch video here: https://youtu.be/Y7dWfzTscrw
Will's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/InspireReflection
Nathan's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/AbstractActivistSE
Chucky's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/IHearYou
Street Epistemology Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Janosch, Chucky (I Hear You), and Lisa (UnrulyLucy) take your questions and comments about SE, and your concise, clear, genuine, and interesting claims to practice SE with.
Watch video here: https://youtu.be/eF7pkjB70tE
Chucky's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/IHearYou
Janosch's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Der_Prometheus
Lisa's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMSInIbBclvxlif4GiUBUA
Street Epistemology Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by Apollos.
Will (Inspire Reflection), Janosch, and Chucky (I Hear You), take your questions and comments about SE, and your concise, clear, genuine, and interesting claims to practice SE with.
Watch video here: https://youtu.be/LToDdTaNrcY
Call in here:
https://streamyard.com/54nxwm878w
Will's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/InspireReflection
Chucky's Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/IHearYou
Janosch's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Der_Prometheus
Street Epistemology Links:
https://linktr.ee/StreetEpistemology
Music provided by Jim Rhodes, with Dan Harris on lap steel.
Narration provided by Apollos.
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States
Some very clunky, unnatural, formulaic questions. (Someone else in the production team even used the term "ILs" with the lady.)
It's a bit ironic that people who claim to be 100% confident are often pretty defensive.
@~28:00: There's a difference between influence and manipulation.
@18:56: Occam's Razor is not about what is "most likely". It's about efficiency and parsimony.
I think we can safely pass on Steve's sophomoric logical positivism.
SEers often seem preoccupied with fawning sensitivity to every possible offense or misconstrual--even those that are likely just an IL's pretextual distractions from poor thinking. Civility needn't entail coddling. SE in practice often comes across to me as a contrived or pretentious performance of the civility of quivering ninnies... or the wilting curiosity of a sheepish faux-ignoramus.
The second caller's seemingly dim-witted obstinance highlights an issue I've raised several times with SEers: It helps to get people to understand 2 dimensions: what's true and what matters. With respect to any given claim, we only care whether or not something is true if it matters. Therefore, we first identify what matters and then discuss how we can know whether or not it is true. Sadly, this guest seemed incapable of understanding such a simple distinction. His sanctimony seemingly feeds an entitlement only to preach. I wonder if a call-in show attracts and selects for these pious performers.
The second caller could've avoided the gish gallop if he had just said that while the loss of any single belief wouldn't bring down his overall faith, he's glad to interrogate a single claim on its own... without constantly flitting from one assertion to the next.
Many people take questions as an indication of ignorance rather than of curiosity. Therefore, it often seems that ILs think they are in a position of explaining rather than reflecting. They don't appreciate that the SEer has tried their own hands behind their back by taking most if the onus of rapport and largely constraining themselves to questions.
@0:53: Immutable or, maybe, inimitable?
One is highly unlikely to have a genuine conversation about a particular belief with a person whose livelihood and identity depend on ardently professing that belief if the conversation is publicly broadcast--and doubly so if it's marketed as a death match. The IL's identity seems wholly wrapped up in machismo and false bravado. In his mind (at least as he performs it), he'd whip all yer asses if his buddy God weren't holding him back. It's part of the ugly machismo and bully culture. After all, in most religions, God is merely a bully. He's a mafia don.
It sounded to me as if Anthony thought early on, "This guy is intent on performing, not genuinely conversing, and I don't want to be a mere prop for his well rehearsed performance." However, it also seems like he could have pursued a much more interesting belief from the IL: _I would do terrible things without my religious beliefs._ What would he do? What constitutes terribleness? Why does he think he'd be that way? Does he feel those desires right now, but his religious beliefs suppress them? Does he think everyone is that way? In what ways does his religious belief suppress his terribleness (e.g., fear of eternal consequences)? Would any religion suffice or just his religion? Does this supposed benefit mean his religious beliefs are true? Are there other areas of life in which he uses this sort of logic?
Although I'm no fan of identity-first framing, it's great to hear women in these discussions. Hope to hear more of all kinds of people in the future. It's been great to hear what different backgrounds have brought to SE and related discussions. And kudos to all those--especially recent novices like the lady here--who step forward and make themselves vulnerable to share these conversations.
This was bad from the start. I wonder what the panel's feedback would've been if they'd only read a transcript of it and didn't know it was Anthony. His initial questions seemed a bit self-referential and meta-conversational. (E.g., now is the time allocated to build rapport.) Then he seemed to leap ahead (i.e., seeming to think he knew where this guy was going, so let's just jump to that), so much so that he sounded presumptuous and obliquely accusatory. His approach nearly guaranteed a rote, defensive, apologetic response.
At the end, the IL did the classic maneuver of insisting that the other person has the views and values she expects--or more to the point, the weakest versions of opinions that are most convenient for her to refute with her version of reasoning. At that point, the conversation was so far off track, the interviewer couldn't find any ground for mental traction. SEers' prioritization of rapport often hamstrings their ability to raise actual doubts. Instead, they seem to impersonate a soapbox on which the IL can blather, thereby further identifying with their nonsense.
The primary SE interview and the review both lacked informed structure. The reviewers often got ducked into the claim itself rather than the logical structure. Many of these SE conversations and reviews would benefit from more training in structured logical analysis. For all the deference to logic and scientific expertise, very few SE practitioners seem sufficiently committed to studying the topics they say they revere. They seem to prefer reinventing the wheel.
@9:04: All people with 26 pairs of chromosomes? Can't be many of those. Maybe she accidentally mashed up 23 pairs and 46 chromosomes, in which case, do people with Down syndrome not have dignity? Why do people cite things they think sound scientific when that clearly has nothing to do with their beliefs? I suppose it's a good sign that they think science confers credibility, even if they themselves are credulous.
I'm sure he buys his supplements exclusively from non-profit organizations that pay no salaries.
It seems that the espoused reasons are very often simply pretextual, and these conversations might actually just be performances of their identities that further reinforce the underlying identity. The belief isn't fact-based; it's identity-based. I suspect that after this conversation, he was even more identified with this insane web of nonsense. And this returns us to the central irony of SE: the lack if evidence of its efficacy.
Wow. A unicorn. Nice.