I get that str.strip() needs some work. However, for the time being (and to ensure backwards compatibility) surely re.sub() is a solid choice for some of the use cases you guys are discussed no?
Jul 10th
Reply
Antonio Andrade
can't believe it
Apr 30th
Reply
Patel Milan R
Author: Jukka Lehtosalo Sponsor: Guido van Rossum Status: Accepted Version: 3.8 PEP 484 defines the type Dict[K, V] for uniform dictionaries, where each value has the same type, and arbitrary key values are supported. It doesn't properly support the common pattern where the type of a dictionary value depends on the string value of the key. Core idea: Consider creating a type to validate an arbitrary JSON document with a fixed schema Proposed syntax: https://icetutor.com
Feb 26th
Reply
Raymond Buhr
I think the methodology for the calculation of language popularity is specifically under representative of both R and python. if you check out trends for dplyr (R) or pandas (python) packages for data manipulation, both dwarf the overall language specific searches. I wonder if that bias also partially led to the declining interest in Ruby on Rails.
Jun 25th
Reply
connor maynes
fgr Dr rhh
Jun 1st
Reply
Raj
Thanks for the kubernetes example, and overall good episode
Mar 22nd
Reply
Mian A. Shah
ypf
Jan 28th
Reply
GreatBahram
As usual, perfect!
Jan 27th
Reply
Antonio Andrade
I think you missed to highlight all the nice work of realphlython and your podcasts, these are key stuffs for Python in 2018!
Dec 27th
Reply
Vignesh Anand Krishnan
The jokes are good but let brian do it. 😂
Dec 13th
Reply
GreatBahram
Congrats Python Bytes. This episode was really great 😎
Claim Ownership
1
United States
Very good podcast!
sorry, but I can't with so many yawning 😂
I get that str.strip() needs some work. However, for the time being (and to ensure backwards compatibility) surely re.sub() is a solid choice for some of the use cases you guys are discussed no?
can't believe it
Author: Jukka Lehtosalo Sponsor: Guido van Rossum Status: Accepted Version: 3.8 PEP 484 defines the type Dict[K, V] for uniform dictionaries, where each value has the same type, and arbitrary key values are supported. It doesn't properly support the common pattern where the type of a dictionary value depends on the string value of the key. Core idea: Consider creating a type to validate an arbitrary JSON document with a fixed schema Proposed syntax: https://icetutor.com
I think the methodology for the calculation of language popularity is specifically under representative of both R and python. if you check out trends for dplyr (R) or pandas (python) packages for data manipulation, both dwarf the overall language specific searches. I wonder if that bias also partially led to the declining interest in Ruby on Rails.
fgr Dr rhh
Thanks for the kubernetes example, and overall good episode
ypf
As usual, perfect!
I think you missed to highlight all the nice work of realphlython and your podcasts, these are key stuffs for Python in 2018!
The jokes are good but let brian do it. 😂
Congrats Python Bytes. This episode was really great 😎
Joel Grus talk can be found here: https://youtu.be/7jiPeIFXb6U
víbora means in Spanish: snake. umm, just thinking about Phyton
It's intetesting the title is flask but you guys spoke more about Django? kidding? hahaha please dont mess with us《Mico framework fans Thanks
nice, another super good Python postcast