Discover
Fault Lines
Fault Lines
Author: National Security Institute
Subscribed: 164Played: 6,231Subscribe
Share
© A National Security Institute Podcast
Description
Fault Lines, the National Security Institute’s flagship podcast, gets you quickly up to speed, three-times-a-week, on the national security and foreign policy debates shaking up America.
Our regular cast of foreign policy experts includes NSI Founder and Executive Director Jamil N. Jaffer, NSI Advisory Board Member Lester Munson, and NSI Senior Fellows Morgan Viña, and Jessica Jones.
Tune in to learn more about the issues dominating headlines and the news stories you may have missed.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
661 Episodes
Reverse
Today, Les, John, Andrew, and Andy examine a fast-moving moment in the Iran conflict as diplomatic and domestic pressures converge. The Prime Minister of Qatar, a key intermediary in ceasefire talks, is meeting with Trump, and markets are already reacting to speculation of a possible settlement. Simultaneously, Israel's president has tasked Gadi Eisenkot with forming the next government — potentially ending Netanyahu's tenure as Prime Minister — while Vice President Vance has publicly called for the war to end and Democrats on Capitol Hill are signaling they will use the December 11 government funding deadline as leverage to cut off support for the fight.With Vance arguing the war cost Republicans the midterms and Trump attributing losses to gas prices rather than the conflict itself, who is actually driving U.S. war policy? If Iran believes it has successfully shaped political outcomes in both Washington and Jerusalem, does that perception harden or soften its position at the negotiating table? As the battlefield settles into a grinding cycle of tit-for-tat strikes and sanctions, what does a realistic path out actually look like?Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.@lestermunson@JohnCLipsey@AndrewBorene@AndyKeiserLike what we're doing here? Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/7qrwKo10tqo Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today, John, Les, and Algene break down a striking tweet from Vice President J.D. Vance pinning Republican midterm losses squarely on the Iran War — and what it signals about the road to 2028. Vance argued it wasn't low turnout that hurt the party, but Trump-Vance voters actively switching sides because of the war. Trump responded by agreeing with the war’s political impact, but holding firm on his decision and the war’s necessity to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.Is Vance's midterm autopsy an honest reckoning or a carefully staged departure from Trump's legacy? What happens when a vice president critiques his own administration's signature foreign policy decision? How have Vance’s remarks positioned him for a political run in 2028?Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.@lestermunson@JohnCLipsey@AlgeneSajeryLike what we're doing here? Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/XEFEMlsy3do Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today, Jess, Les, John, and Andrew break down a strong midterm night for Democrats, with a blue wave sweeping across the country, delivering historic victories and surprising upsets. Voters cast ballots primarily on economic concerns, though AI, data centers, and Iran hovered in the background as the emerging issues of the cycle. With Democrats poised to gain oversight leverage in key committees, the question now turns to what a divided or shifted Congress means for a foreign policy landscape still defined by active wars, rising Chinese pressure, and an unresolved Iran strategy.Will Democratic gains in Congress bring greater oversight of Trump’s foreign policy on Iran, Ukraine, and beyond? With the president's last-minute announcement ending U.S. aid to Israel, how will a new Congress shape — or simply react to — American posture in the Middle East? And what do voter concerns about AI and data centers reveal about the growing intersection of technology, politics, and national security?Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.@lestermunson@NotTVJessJones@JohnCLipsey@AndrewBoreneLike what we're doing here? Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/fGadEo3BU18 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today, Les, Jess, John, and Amy dig into the political crisis unfolding in Poland after President Nawrocki was forced to cut short a state visit to Senegal and return home over a standoff surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal. At the center of the dispute is a long-running power struggle over who controls Poland's highest court — including the president's authority to swear in new judges — and whether the prime minister's office has effectively seized control of the body meant to check it. The crisis has drawn sharp criticism from European partners and raised deeper questions about what happens when constitutional norms break down and institutions lose their credibility.Is Poland's judicial standoff a symptom of a broader democratic unraveling, or a messy but legitimate political dispute best resolved from within? How does the Polish crisis compare to norm-breaking episodes in the United States, from court-packing debates to January 6? When institutional credibility collapses, can prosecutions and political pressure actually restore it — or do they only deepen the wound?Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.@lestermunson@NotTVJessJones@JohnCLipsey@amykmitchellLike what we're doing here? Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/VpIR_5U6M-U Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today, John, Jess, Les, and Andrew take stock of where the United States and Iran are headed — and how fast. Vice President Vance delivered a Trump-approved letter to Iran's National Security Council proposing direct talks, emphasizing the nuclear program as a non-negotiable agenda item. Meanwhile, the U.S. has been repositioning forces away from vulnerable bases, and the administration appears to be running a deliberate operational clock — sprint to diplomacy, or face a short, intense military campaign.Is there a genuine diplomatic window left, or has Washington already made its decision? If strikes resume, what would they actually accomplish beyond another round of mowing the lawn? With the midterms behind him, how much will Trump's concern for his legacy and Vice President Vance's future shape his appetite for escalation? How can we follow in Captain Picard’s footsteps as we move ahead?Check out the answers to these questions and more in this episode of Fault Lines.@lestermunson@NotTVJessJones@JohnCLipsey@AndrewBoreneLike what we're doing here? Be sure to rate, review, and subscribe. And don't forget to follow @faultlines_pod and @masonnatsec on Twitter!We are also on YouTube; watch today's episode here: https://youtu.be/MoLaXeFBKo8 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.




