Drugwatch Investigates

If you or a loved one developed vision loss while taking Ozempic or Wegovy, you may be eligible for a lawsuit. Learn more and get a free case review: https://www.drugwatch.com/drugs/ozempic/vision-loss/ ───────────────────────────────────────Tens of millions of Americans are taking GLP-1 medications like Ozempic and Wegovy. Doctors are prescribing them, telehealth companies are handing them out online, and the demand shows no signs of slowing down. But there’s a serious risk not listed on the U.S. warning label, even though it appears on labels in more than 30 countries around the world.It’s called NAION, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, which results in sudden, largely irreversible vision loss. People experiencing it wake up one morning simply unable to see out of one or both eyes. There are already more than 800 reports of NAION filed with the FDA, with research suggesting that number represents only a fraction of the real total.In this episode, attorney and consumer safety advocate Whitney Di Bona sits down with Ellen Relkin, partner and Chair of the Defective Drugs and Devices Department at Weitz and Luxenberg, and court-appointed co-lead counsel in the New Jersey multicounty litigation against Novo Nordisk. Over her 40-year career, Ellen has helped secure some of the largest pharmaceutical settlements in history. She is on the front lines of this litigation every single day.──────────────────────────────────────Topics covered in this episode:What NAION is, what it does to your vision and why there is currently no known treatment.How a Harvard study first identified a dramatically increased risk of NAION in patients using semaglutide and how the science has continued to evolve since.Why a NAION warning appears on drug labels in more than 30 countries, including the UK, Australia and Korea, but not in the United States.The difference between the New Jersey multicounty litigation and the federal MDL in Philadelphia and why Ellen believes New Jersey is the better venue for plaintiffs.The preemption defense Novo Nordisk is using in federal court and why Ellen calls it bogus.What a "disc at risk" is and why the American Optometric Association recommends getting a baseline eye exam before starting any GLP-1 medication.The compounded GLP-1 market, the telehealth companies, online prescribers and compounding pharmacies, and why those cases present unique legal challenges.Why the FDA has still not added a NAION warning to US labels despite mounting evidence that GLP-1 can lead to blindness.Who qualifies to file a lawsuit and what plaintiffs need to show.A truck driver who lost his livelihood. A patient still on the drug who was never told about the connection. The human cost behind these cases.───────────────────────────────────────Resources & Links:- Learn more about the Ozempic and Wegovy vision loss lawsuits: https://www.drugwatch.com/drugs/ozempic/vision-loss/ - Stay up to date on all dangerous drug litigation: drugwatch.comNote: Always consult with health and legal professionals for personalized advice. The information provided reflects current research and advocacy efforts. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal or medical advice. The opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Drugwatch.

Meta, the company behind Instagram and Facebook, has spent years in courtrooms arguing that its platforms are safe and not addictive for kids. But local governments and individuals have taken the social media giant to court, claiming that its digital products are responsible for a mental health crisis unfolding across the country. On August 26, 2026, Meta agreed to pay up to $18 billion to resolve lawsuits brought by dozens of state attorneys general. As part of that deal, the company is being forced to make sweeping changes to how Instagram and Facebook work for teen users. But the fight is far from over. Thousands of individual family lawsuits are still pending. School districts across the country are also suing.In this episode, attorney and consumer safety advocate Whitney Di Bona sits down with Christian Simmons, reporter for Drugwatch and author of the major investigation "Big Tech on Trial: Inside the Social Media Addiction Lawsuits," to break down exactly what happened, what it means, and what comes next.Topics covered in this episode:Why lawsuits treat social media apps as defective products and how that legal strategy changes everythingHow the social media litigation is broken into three buckets: Individual family lawsuits, school district cases and state attorney general lawsuits — and where each stands right nowThe terms of Meta's landmark settlement with dozens of states: $16-18 billion and sweeping platform changes, including a two-hour daily time limit for teens, notifications disabled during school hours and overnight, a ban on cosmetic surgery filters and the option to turn off the algorithmic feed entirelyThe real questions about whether these changes will work in practice, and the parental responsibility debate that continues to divide public opinionThe first bellwether social media addiction case ever decided by a jury — and why the $6 million verdict against Meta and YouTube matters far beyond the dollar amountHow the algorithm creates dangerous rabbit holes, including for kids going through breakups, depression and eating disordersWhy quitting social media isn't a realistic solution for many people and how adults are already using bricks, second phones and app blockers to manage their own useWhat Australia, the UK and Canada are doing differently and whether the US is falling behind on protecting kidsWhat a global settlement for the thousands of pending individual cases might look like and the signs that suggest it could be comingThe results of Consumer Notice’s social media survey and what it means for the nation’s mental healthIf your child has been harmed by social media, you are not alone. To learn more about your legal options, visit: https://www.drugwatch.com/social-media-addiction/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=audio&utm_campaign=social-media-addictionResources & Links:Read the full Drugwatch investigation, Big Tech on Trial: Inside the Social Media Addiction Lawsuits: https://www.drugwatch.com/featured/social-media-addiction-lawsuits/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=audio&utm_campaign=social-media-addiction See the Consumer Notice social media addiction survey details: https://www.consumernotice.org/personal-injury/social-media-harm/addiction-survey/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=audio&utm_campaign=social-media-addiction Stay up to date on all social media litigation and news: drugwatch.com Note: Always consult health and legal professionals for personalized advice. The information provided reflects current research and advocacy efforts. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal or medical advice. The opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Drugwatch.

Every single day, you probably apply lip products without a second thought. But what if the ingredients in your favorite lip gloss, lip balm or lip mask were never tested for what happens when they go into your body?  And what if those same products contain microplastics?In this episode, attorney and consumer safety advocate Whitney Di Bona sits down with Laura DiGirolamo — California attorney, beauty industry insider and founder of YOM Beauty and the Lip Service Alliance — who spent over 20 years launching innovations in the beauty industry before uncovering what she calls one of the biggest blind spots in beauty history. Lip products are classified as cosmetics, meaning they are regulated as external-use-only products. Yet we ingest and absorb them in ways that no regulation in the world fully accounts for. When Laura could no longer ignore it, she built the science, commissioned peer-reviewed research papers, founded a nonprofit and created the world's first independently certified microplastic-free, food-grade lip product to prove it could be done.Topics covered in this episode:The regulatory blind spot hiding in plain sight — why lip products classified as cosmetics are held to zero food-grade standards despite being applied directly to the mouthTwo exposure pathways regulations ignore: ingestion and absorption through lip vermilion, which behaves more like a sponge than a skin barrierWhy 80 to 90% of lip products contain microplastics, and what regulations EU law has coming by 2031The titanium dioxide paradox: why the EU banned it from food in 2022 due to genotoxicity concerns, yet it remains a common coloring ingredient in lip productsHow flavoring lip products like food — vanilla frosting, strawberry shortcake, Skittles — subconsciously encourages ingestion, especially in childrenWhy "clean beauty" doesn't solve the problem — and why the label has no legal definitionWhat the Lip Service Alliance is doing to close the regulatory and science gap, and how to get involvedWhat to look for on your lip product label right now, and which ingredients to avoidResources & Links:Yom Beauty: yombeauty.comThe Lip Service Alliance: Follow @lipservicealliance on Instagram for updates and ways to get involvedLaura DiGirolamo on Instagram: @meetlauradigiNote: Always consult with health and legal professionals for personalized advice. The information provided reflects current research and advocacy efforts. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal or medical advice. The opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Drugwatch.

What did Meta and YouTube know about the harm they were causing to children — and when did they know it? The evidence just went before a jury for the first time, and the verdict is in.In this episode, attorney and consumer safety advocate Whitney Di Bona sits down with Nicki Petrossi, host of the Scrolling 2 Death podcast and former social media marketing executive, who spent nearly every day inside the Los Angeles courtroom during the historic bellwether trial against Meta and YouTube. Nicki took nearly 600 pages of notes and shares what she witnessed firsthand.Meta and YouTube were found liable for addicting a young woman who began using YouTube at age 6 and Instagram at age 9. The verdict is now setting the precedent for thousands of cases to follow, and families across the country are taking notice.Topics covered in this episode:How Nicki went from running a global social media marketing business to becoming one of the leading advocates warning parents about platform harmThe story of Kaley, the 20-year-old plaintiff at the center of the bellwether trial, and what she alleged Instagram and YouTube did to her mental healthInternal documents revealed at trial, including employees calling Instagram "a drug" and themselves "basically pushers"How YouTube's own internal presentation stated its vision was to build a platform that is addictiveMeta's strategy of targeting children under 13 as tweens while publicly claiming kids that age were not allowed on the platformAdam Mosseri's testimony comparing a teenager's 16-hour daily Instagram use to staying up too late watching NetflixThe specific platform features alleged to drive addiction: the algorithm, infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications and cosmetic filtersWhy these cases are product liability lawsuits and how plaintiffs successfully argued around Section 230 immunityThe school district lawsuits and what Breathitt County Schools is alleging against MetaWhat parents can do right now if their child has access to a smartphone or social mediaIf your child has been harmed by social media, you are not alone. To learn more about your legal options, visit: https://www.consumernotice.org/legal/social-media-harm-lawsuit/To keep up to date with some of the biggest developments in dangerous product lawsuits, sign up for the Drugwatch Newsletter. After highlighting the growing number of Ozempic lawsuits in June, July's issue will focus on social media addiction. Resources & Links:Scrolling 2 Death podcast and parent resources: scrolling2death.comTech-Safe Learning Coalition: techsafelearning.orgNicki Petrossi on Instagram: @scrolling2deathNote: Always consult with health and legal professionals for personalized advice. The information provided reflects current research and advocacy efforts. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal or medical advice. The opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Drugwatch.

Discover the alarming evidence linking glyphosate, the world's most widely used herbicide, to serious health risks, including cancer. Join attorney Whitney Di Bona and Kelly Ryerson, also known as the Glyphosate Girl, as they unpack the ongoing courtroom battles, regulatory failures and urgent need for reform in our food system. To learn more about Roundup lawsuits, visit https://www.drugwatch.com/legal/roundup-lawsuit/. Topics covered in this episode:The scientific consensus that glyphosate is a carcinogen and its presence in rainwater, urine and even children's bodiesThe implications of the Supreme Court case Monsanto v. Durnell and potential corporate immunityHow Bayer's legal strategies, including legislation and industry lobbying, threaten consumer rightsThe impact of glyphosate in food through GMO crops and pre-harvest spraying practicesThe differences between regenerative and organic farming, and how soil health influences nutrient densityThe potential for regenerative agriculture to replace harmful chemical relianceHow public awareness and consumer choices can influence policy and industry practicesKelly Ryerson’s personal journey from illness to activism and her efforts to raise awarenessResources & Links:Roundup: Controversies, Health Risks and Industry FailuresStoppoison.org - mobilize against pesticide legislationConnect With Kelly Ryerson:https://www.instagram.com/glyphosategirl/https://www.americanregeneration.org/ Note: Always consult with health and legal professionals for personalized advice. The information provided reflects current research and advocacy efforts. Nothing in this podcast constitutes legal or medical advice. The opinions of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Drugwatch.