The NHPPA Podcast

Buckley says inspectors given power to seize for “compliance” will use that power exactly as written. Future regulations will not bind the courts or shrink the statute.

Homeopathy treats the person, not a disease label. In Episode 2 of the NHPPA Homeopathic Network series, NHPPA President Shawn Buckley is joined by Elizabeth Chapman of Canadians for Homeopathy, practising homeopath and clinical herbalist Victor Cirone, and retired medical doctor Stephen Malthouse. Stephen practised conventional medicine for more than four decades and integrated homeopathy for about twenty five of those years. His verdict is blunt: once you see what homeopathy can do, you cannot go back. The panel explains why outcomes can be so fast in acute cases, why suppressing symptoms can drive illness deeper, and how homeopathy sits in a different medical tradition than the model used by Health Canada. The discussion also covers viewer questions, combination remedies, working with children and animals, and a clear call to action on Bill C-224. **Panelists:**   • Elizabeth Chapman, Canadians for Homeopathy   • Victor Cirone, Registered Homeopath and Clinical Herbalist   • Dr. Stephen Malthouse, retired medical doctor   Watch the full replay, then share it with practitioners and patients who need this context. Learn more about the NHPPA’s work and how you can get involved at https://nhppa.org   Subscribe at https://nhppa.org/subscribe **Chapters:**   00:00 Welcome to the Homeopathic Network   02:15 Meet the panel   04:57 Why you cannot go back   08:18 Fast results in acute cases   10:55 Empiricism vs rationalism   17:06 What allopathic medicine actually means   21:00 Suppression is not a cure   30:00 Spanish flu and homeopathic hospitals   38:00 Case examples, children, and animals   48:04 Viewer questions   51:00 Bill C-224: take action now   57:36 Single remedies vs combinations   01:01:00 Steroid cream, acid blockers, and deeper illness   01:09:07 Closing call to action

Buckley prefers the Hazardous Products Act model: an immediate order that a court can still review. He cites the EMPowerplus case, where Health Canada kept blocking a product after being warned of suicides.

Buckley explains that telling an inspector to leave private property should end the visit. Asked about drop-side cribs, he says Canada can protect babies without abandoning court supervision.

Buckley says other statutes do not justify seizing property with no court report. He and Senator Eaton clash over whether section 20(4) exempts inspectors from trespass.