'If You Can Keep It': The Stakes Of The State Supreme Court Elections
Digest
This podcast episode from 1A delves into the significance of state supreme court elections, examining their historical context, current challenges, and future implications. The episode begins by discussing the original intent of promoting judicial independence in these elections and the current debate surrounding partisan versus non-partisan systems. It then explores the substantial role state supreme courts play in shaping policy within their respective states, particularly in areas like ballot initiatives, electoral maps, and access to abortion. The episode uses Wisconsin as an example to illustrate how shifts in the ideological balance of a state supreme court can have a significant impact on issues like abortion rights, gerrymandering, and voting restrictions. The episode further examines the challenges of voter awareness and information in these elections, highlighting the tendency for them to be low-information and low-turnout. It discusses the impact of attack ads and the need for voters to be more informed about the candidates and their positions. The episode then focuses on specific state supreme court races in North Carolina, Texas, Michigan, and Ohio, highlighting the potential for ideological shifts in these states and the increasing national attention and spending in these races. The episode explores the increasing nationalization of state supreme court races, particularly in the wake of the Dobbs decision, discussing the influx of national money and the growing interest from both the left and right in these races. It also addresses concerns about public trust in the judiciary, particularly among minority communities, discussing the lack of diversity on the bench and the need for reforms to address these issues. The episode concludes by emphasizing the importance of voting in state supreme court elections, highlighting the significant role these courts play in shaping policy and protecting rights. It also discusses the potential for these courts to play a crucial role in the upcoming election.
Outlines
State Supreme Court Elections: A Crucial Battleground
This episode explores the growing importance of state supreme court elections, examining their historical context, current challenges, and future implications. It discusses the original intent of promoting judicial independence and the current debate surrounding partisan versus non-partisan systems.
Shaping Policy: The Power of State Supreme Courts
The episode examines the significant role state supreme courts play in shaping policy within their respective states, particularly in areas like ballot initiatives, electoral maps, and access to abortion. It highlights how these courts often have the final word on legal and constitutional questions.
The Political Landscape: State Supreme Court Races in Focus
The episode analyzes the political implications of state supreme court elections, using Wisconsin as an example. It discusses how a recent shift in the court's ideological balance has had a significant impact on issues like abortion rights, gerrymandering, and voting restrictions. It also examines specific races in North Carolina, Texas, Michigan, and Ohio, highlighting the potential for ideological shifts and the increasing national attention and spending in these races.
Nationalization and Public Trust: Challenges and Opportunities
The episode explores the increasing nationalization of state supreme court races, particularly in the wake of the Dobbs decision. It discusses the influx of national money and the growing interest from both the left and right in these races. It also addresses concerns about public trust in the judiciary, particularly among minority communities, discussing the lack of diversity on the bench and the need for reforms to address these issues.
Voter Engagement: Resources and Importance
The episode provides resources for voters to learn more about state supreme court candidates and their rulings, including the Bolts magazine and the Brennan Center's State Court Report. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of voting in these elections, highlighting the significant role these courts play in shaping policy and protecting rights.
Keywords
State Supreme Court Elections
Elections for judges who serve on the highest court in a state, responsible for interpreting state laws and constitutions. These elections are becoming increasingly important due to their impact on issues like abortion rights, voting rights, and gerrymandering.
Judicial Independence
The principle that judges should be free from political influence and pressure when making decisions. This is a key concern in state supreme court elections, as the politicization of these races can undermine public confidence in the courts.
Gerrymandering
The manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group. State supreme courts play a crucial role in determining the legality of gerrymandered maps, which can have a significant impact on the outcome of elections.
Dobbs Decision
The 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, leading to a significant increase in national attention and spending in state supreme court elections, particularly on issues related to abortion rights.
Public Trust in the Judiciary
The level of confidence that the public has in the courts and the judges who serve on them. Public trust in the judiciary has been declining in recent years, due in part to concerns about politicization, lack of diversity, and the perception that the courts are not fair or impartial.
Diversity on the Bench
The representation of different racial, ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic groups on the judiciary. Lack of diversity on the bench can raise concerns about fairness and impartiality, and it can also make it more difficult for people from marginalized communities to feel represented in the courts.
Q&A
What are the key issues at stake in state supreme court elections?
State supreme court elections are crucial because they determine the interpretation of state laws and constitutions, impacting issues like abortion rights, voting rights, gerrymandering, and access to healthcare.
How do partisan and non-partisan elections for state supreme court judges differ?
Partisan elections involve candidates running with party affiliations, while non-partisan elections do not. Partisan elections can lead to greater politicization, while non-partisan elections aim to promote judicial independence.
What are the concerns about the politicization of state supreme court elections?
Politicization can undermine public confidence in the courts, as judges may be perceived as being influenced by political pressure rather than by the law. It can also lead to increased spending and influence from special interest groups.
How can voters become more informed about state supreme court candidates and their rulings?
Voters can access resources like the Bolts magazine and the Brennan Center's State Court Report to learn about candidates, their positions, and their past rulings. They can also research candidates' backgrounds and qualifications.
Why is it important to vote in state supreme court elections?
State supreme courts play a significant role in shaping policy and protecting rights, and their decisions can have a profound impact on people's lives. Voting in these elections is essential for ensuring that the courts reflect the values and priorities of the community.
Show Notes
Make no mistake, these courts are influential, deciding cases related to their respective state constitutions and electoral questions like whether legislative districts are gerrymandered. And they decide cases related to other major issues at stake around the country.
We look at how the races for state supreme courts this year might determine the fates of reproductive access, electoral maps, and more.
Want to support 1A? Give to your local public radio station and subscribe to this podcast. Have questions? Connect with us. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
Table of contents
United States
