DiscoverJuror Misconduct Law in Review#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?
#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?

#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?

Update: 2018-11-30
Share

Description

State v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).

Nilgun Aykent Zahour & SM JUROR analyze the juror misconduct issues in State v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).

The issue we're going to discuss is whether the jury's use of a laptop to "zoom in" on surveillance photos amounts to experimentation and juror misconduct.

 

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?

#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?

Nilgun Aykent Zahour