Digest

This episode of the Daily Wire Backstage podcast features Andrew Klaven, Ben Shapiro, Michael Noles, and Jeremy Boring discussing the vice presidential debate between JD Vance and Tim Walls. Klaven praises Vance's performance, highlighting his composure, empathy, and articulate defense of Donald Trump's policies. He contrasts Vance's performance with Walls' awkwardness and gaffes. The panelists also criticize the moderators for their biased questioning and fact-checking, arguing that they failed to provide a fair platform for both candidates. They discuss the closeness of the polls between Trump and Harris, exploring various scenarios, including the possibility of a Trump victory due to a hidden male vote or a Harris victory due to increased youth turnout. The panelists compare the VP candidates' performances to their running mates, praising Vance's consistency and eloquence while criticizing Walls' awkwardness and Harris's lack of memorable moments. They discuss the Democrats' opposition to labeling cartels as terrorist organizations, arguing that while cartels may not technically fit the definition, they pose a significant national security threat and should be handled by the military. The panelists also discuss the dynamics between Vance and Walls during the debate, questioning whether the seemingly amicable interactions were genuine or a strategic play. They examine the Democrats' class warfare rhetoric, arguing that it is hypocritical given the support for Trump from many billionaires. The panelists discuss Walls' abortion policies, particularly his decision to repeal a requirement for doctors to provide medical care to babies born alive after an abortion, arguing that this policy is barbaric and reflects the mainstream Democrat position on abortion. They analyze the impact of George Soros's purchase of over 200 radio stations on the election, acknowledging the potential for propaganda but believing it is too late to significantly affect the outcome. The panelists discuss whether Vance's performance made Catholics proud, highlighting his handling of controversial issues like IVF, arguing that he conveyed the true meaning of the Trump campaign while remaining respectful of Catholic values. They discuss Vance's political approach, contrasting it with Trump's "wrecking ball" style, describing Vance as using a more nuanced and strategic approach. The conversation shifts to the importance of engaging with "nerd culture" to reach young men who may be alienated by traditional political discourse. The hosts analyze Harris's public stance on gun ownership, suggesting that her claims of being a gun owner are disingenuous. They discuss the potential impact of the Longshoreman's strike on the upcoming election, speculating that the strike could be a deliberate tactic by the Democrats to exploit union support, potentially leading to shortages and economic hardship. The hosts emphasize the importance of elections, highlighting the significant changes that can occur as a result of political victories. They discuss the anxieties surrounding a potential Harris presidency, particularly among conservatives who fear a drastic shift in the political landscape. They explore the possibility that a Harris presidency, despite its potential negative consequences, could ultimately lead to a national restoration. The hosts argue that despite Trump's flaws, he is the better choice for president compared to Harris. They emphasize the importance of voting for Trump, not because he is perfect, but because his policies and appointments are superior to those of Harris. The hosts stress the importance of continued political engagement even after the election, cautioning against viewing the election as a final battle, emphasizing that regardless of the outcome, the fight for conservative values will continue. They conclude by emphasizing the enduring responsibility of citizens in a democratic republic, arguing that even in the face of potential political upheaval, the responsibility to uphold conservative values and engage in the political process remains paramount.

Outlines

00:00:00

Introduction and Preview

Andrew Klaven introduces the Daily Wire Backstage podcast, featuring himself, Ben Shapiro, Michael Noles, and Jeremy Boring discussing politics, religion, culture, and more.

00:00:18

JD Vance's Debate Performance and the Moderators' Bias

Klaven praises JD Vance's performance in the vice presidential debate, highlighting his composure, empathy, and articulate defense of Donald Trump's policies. He contrasts Vance's performance with Tim Walls' awkwardness and gaffes. He criticizes the moderators for their biased questioning and fact-checking, highlighting their failure to provide a fair platform for both candidates.

00:42:30

Election Scenarios and VP Candidate Comparisons

The panelists discuss the closeness of the polls between Trump and Harris, expressing skepticism about their accuracy. They explore various scenarios, including the possibility of a Trump victory due to a hidden male vote or a Harris victory due to increased youth turnout. They compare the VP candidates' performances to their running mates. They praise JD Vance's performance, highlighting his consistency and eloquence. They contrast this with Tim Walls' awkwardness and Kamala Harris's lack of memorable moments.

00:54:41

Cartels, Terrorism, and the Democrats' Stance

The panelists discuss the Democrats' opposition to labeling cartels as terrorist organizations. They argue that while cartels may not technically fit the definition of terrorist organizations, they pose a significant national security threat and should be handled by the military.

00:56:08

Analyzing the Dynamics Between Vance and Walls

The panelists discuss the dynamics between Vance and Walls during the debate. They question whether the seemingly amicable interactions were genuine or a strategic play. They also discuss JD Vance's potential to become president after Trump's presidency.

00:57:23

Class Warfare Rhetoric and Abortion Policies

The panelists discuss the Democrats' class warfare rhetoric, particularly their claims that Donald Trump benefits billionaires. They argue that this rhetoric is hypocritical, given the support for Trump from many billionaires. They discuss Tim Walls' abortion policies, particularly his decision to repeal a requirement for doctors to provide medical care to babies born alive after an abortion. They argue that this policy is barbaric and reflects the mainstream Democrat position on abortion.

01:01:59

Soros's Radio Station Purchase and Vance's Catholic Views

The panelists discuss the impact of George Soros's purchase of over 200 radio stations on the election. They acknowledge the potential for propaganda but believe it is too late to significantly affect the outcome. They discuss whether JD Vance's performance made Catholics proud. They highlight his handling of controversial issues like IVF, arguing that he conveyed the true meaning of the Trump campaign while remaining respectful of Catholic values.

01:03:19

Vance's Political Approach and Engaging Nerd Culture

The discussion begins with praise for JD Vance's political approach, contrasting it with Trump's "wrecking ball" style. Vance is described as using a more nuanced and strategic approach, exemplified by his invocation of Christ during a debate. The conversation shifts to the importance of engaging with "nerd culture" (superheroes, video games) to reach young men who may be alienated by traditional political discourse.

01:06:55

Harris's Gun Ownership Stance and the Longshoreman's Strike

The hosts analyze Kamala Harris's public stance on gun ownership, suggesting that her claims of being a gun owner are disingenuous. They argue that her position reflects a broader trend of both parties converging on certain issues, particularly those related to entitlements, abortion, and guns. They discuss the potential impact of the Longshoreman's strike on the upcoming election. They speculate that the strike could be a deliberate tactic by the Democrats to exploit union support, potentially leading to shortages and economic hardship.

01:10:03

The Consequential Nature of Elections and the Fear of a Harris Presidency

The hosts emphasize the importance of elections, highlighting the significant changes that can occur as a result of political victories. They cite the passage of Obamacare as an example of how a policy, regardless of its merits, can have a profound impact on the political landscape. They discuss the anxieties surrounding a potential Kamala Harris presidency, particularly among conservatives who fear a drastic shift in the political landscape. They acknowledge the possibility of a "worst-case scenario" where Harris wins a landslide victory and implements policies that significantly alter the country's direction.

01:12:33

National Restoration and the Importance of Voting for Trump

The hosts explore the possibility that a Kamala Harris presidency, despite its potential negative consequences, could ultimately lead to a national restoration. They draw parallels to the Jimmy Carter era, arguing that a period of significant hardship could ultimately pave the way for a conservative resurgence. They argue that despite Donald Trump's flaws, he is the better choice for president compared to Kamala Harris. They emphasize the importance of voting for Trump, not because he is perfect, but because his policies and appointments are superior to those of Harris.

01:14:42

Continued Engagement and the Enduring Responsibility of Citizenship

The hosts stress the importance of continued political engagement even after the election. They caution against viewing the election as a final battle, emphasizing that regardless of the outcome, the fight for conservative values will continue. They conclude by emphasizing the enduring responsibility of citizens in a democratic republic. They argue that even in the face of potential political upheaval, the responsibility to uphold conservative values and engage in the political process remains paramount.

Keywords

Q&A

• What were the key takeaways from JD Vance's performance in the vice presidential debate?

  JD Vance delivered a stellar performance, showcasing composure, empathy, and articulate defense of Donald Trump's policies. He effectively countered Tim Walls' awkwardness and gaffes, presenting a non-threatening image of the Trump-Vance ticket.

• How did the moderators perform in the debate, and what impact did their actions have?

  The moderators were heavily criticized for their biased questioning and fact-checking, failing to provide a fair platform for both candidates. Their actions highlighted the need for removing moderators from the debate process.

• What are the different scenarios for the upcoming election, and what factors could influence the outcome?

  The panelists discussed three plausible scenarios: a close race with Trump winning due to gains among Hispanics and working men, a close race with Harris winning due to increased suburban women turnout, and a landslide Harris victory due to unprecedented youth turnout.

• How did JD Vance's performance compare to his running mate, Donald Trump, and how does this impact the election?

  JD Vance delivered a consistently good performance, showcasing eloquence and consistency. While he lacked Trump's memorable moments, his performance effectively countered the negative media narrative surrounding him.

• Why do Democrats oppose labeling cartels as terrorist organizations, and what are the implications of this stance?

  The panelists argued that while cartels may not technically fit the definition of terrorist organizations, they pose a significant national security threat and should be handled by the military. The Democrats' opposition to this labeling reflects their reluctance to acknowledge the severity of the cartel problem.

• Was the seemingly amicable interaction between Vance and Walls genuine or a strategic play?

  The panelists questioned whether the seemingly amicable interactions were genuine or a strategic play. They suggested that Vance's approach was likely a calculated attempt to appeal to a broader audience and counter the negative media narrative surrounding him.

• Why do Democrats continue to claim that Donald Trump benefits billionaires, despite the support for Trump from many billionaires?

  The panelists argued that the Democrats' class warfare rhetoric is hypocritical, given the support for Trump from many billionaires. They suggested that this rhetoric is a tactic to divide society along economic lines and distract from the Democrats' own policies that benefit the wealthy.

• What is the significance of Tim Walls' decision to repeal a requirement for doctors to provide medical care to babies born alive after an abortion?

  The panelists argued that this policy is barbaric and reflects the mainstream Democrat position on abortion. They highlighted the hypocrisy of Democrats who claim to support women's rights while simultaneously advocating for policies that allow for the death of babies born alive after an abortion.

• How will George Soros's purchase of over 200 radio stations affect the election?

  The panelists acknowledged the potential for propaganda but believe it is too late to significantly affect the outcome. They suggested that Soros's purchase is a sign of the Democrats' desperation to control the narrative and influence public opinion.

• Did JD Vance's performance make Catholics proud, and how did he handle controversial issues like IVF?

  The panelists argued that Vance's performance made Catholics proud, particularly his handling of controversial issues like IVF. They highlighted his ability to convey the true meaning of the Trump campaign while remaining respectful of Catholic values.

Show Notes