Discoverdicta – law in audio2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.
2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

Update: 2025-05-31
Share

Description

Too much reading? We’ve got you. Check out our new Legal Audio Generator on our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.


Criminal law — Sentencing — Considerations


(00:00:12 ) Summary

(00:00:13 ) Facts and Procedural History

(00:03:28 ) Held


(00:08:52 ) Reasons for Judgment: Rowe J. (Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O’Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. concurring)

(00:08:57 ) I. Overview – 1

(00:10:33 ) II. Factual Background – 4

(00:10:55 ) A. The Offences – 5

(00:12:26 ) B. Pre-Sentencing Procedural History – 10

(00:15:02 ) C. Background of the Offender – 18

(00:16:41 ) III. Proceedings Below – 22

(00:16:43 ) A. Reasons for Sentence, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 2022 ONSC 2274 (Aitken J.) – 22

(00:21:43 ) B. Ontario Court of Appeal, 2023 ONCA 552 (Hourigan, Brown and Monahan JJ.A.) – 32

(00:23:04 ) IV. Issues – 35

(00:23:36 ) V. Analysis – 36

(00:24:26 ) A. The Sentencing Regime – 38

(00:24:45 ) (1) Section 718: The Purpose and Objectives of Sentencing – 39

(00:25:44 ) (2) Proportionality and Secondary Sentencing Principles – 41

(00:29:02 ) B. Standard of Review – 47

(00:33:19 ) C. Did the Sentencing Judge Err in Principle? – 53

(00:33:29 ) (1) Consideration of Treatment and Programming – 54

(00:39:40 ) (2) Application – 64

(00:46:11 ) D. Assessment of Enhanced Credit – 77

(00:46:22 ) (1) The Development of Enhanced Credit – 78

(00:51:53 ) (2) Whether Delay Caused by the Offender Constitutes “Wrongful Conduct” – 87

(00:59:37 ) (3) The Standard of Review – 100

(01:01:32 ) (4) Application – 106

(01:04:27 ) VI. Conclusion – 112

Comments 
loading
In Channel
2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

2025-05-3101:04:43

loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

2025 SCC 16 – R. v. J.W.

dicta