DiscoverJuror Misconduct Law in Review#22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?
#22:  Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

#22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

Update: 2019-05-27
Share

Description

Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019).

Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether the trial court erred in declining to conduct a post-verdict evidentiary hearing to determine whether a juror, who suffered memory gaps with possible Alzheimer’s disease, was competent to serve on the jury.

     

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

#22:  Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

#22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

Nilgun Aykent Zahour