DiscoverJuror Misconduct Law in Review#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?
#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

Update: 2019-06-22
Share

Description

State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018).

Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether a sequestered jury’s fear of not being fed adversely influenced or pressured them in their deliberations. 

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

Nilgün Aykent Zahour