#291 Joe Kent - His Message to President Trump on Ending the War With Iran
1Digest
This podcast delves into the complexities of US foreign policy, focusing on the Iran conflict and the significant influence of Israel on American decision-making. The guest, a former intelligence official and advisor to President Trump, shares insights from their resignation and experiences, criticizing the "playbook" of Israeli objectives leading to US involvement and the expenditure of American resources. The discussion covers the lack of a clear US strategy, the impact of Israeli lobbying and financial influence, and the potential for miscalculations that could lead to wider conflicts. It also touches upon domestic issues like border security, the threat of terrorism, and the corrupting influence of money in politics. The speaker advocates for a more independent US foreign policy, emphasizing the need to restrain Israel, engage in direct diplomacy with Iran, and prioritize homeland security. The conversation also explores the evolution of modern warfare, advice for military service, and the importance of accountability for leaders.
Outlines
Introduction and Resignation from Presidential Position
The podcast begins with the guest discussing their resignation from a presidential role, citing feelings of being misled and ineffective in advancing the agenda. They emphasize the courage required for this decision and the underlying reasons for their departure.
Frustration with "Slow-Walking" and War Escalation
The guest elaborates on their resignation, driven by a desire to remain for the mission rather than personal gain. They express frustration with bureaucratic delays ("slow-walking") on critical issues and the rapid escalation into war, which prompted their public dissent.
Influence on Presidential Decisions and Public Resignation
The guest details how they believe media and Israeli government officials influenced presidential decisions, leading to actions taken in a closed environment. Public resignation is explained as the most effective method to voice concerns.
Criticism of Israel and Media's Role in Shaping Narratives
The conversation addresses backlash for criticizing Israel, with the guest presenting evidence of Israeli influence on US decision-making regarding Iran, as suggested by various publications and US officials.
Financial Discrepancies and the Israeli "Playbook"
The significant financial cost of conflicts is highlighted, contrasting Israeli and US spending. The guest describes a recurring pattern where Israeli objectives drive US involvement, leading to the loss of American lives and resources.
Trump's Statements and Iran's Contradictory Response
President Trump's optimistic statements about conversations with Iran are contrasted with Iran's immediate denial, labeling the claims as false and psychological warfare.
The Core Issue: Restraining Israel's Influence
The fundamental problem is identified as the inability to restrain Israel. The guest suggests that President Trump possesses the authority to do so, which is deemed a crucial step towards achieving peace.
Market Manipulation Speculation and Unusual Trades
Speculation arises that Trump's statement was intended to boost the stock market, supported by evidence of unusual, large trades occurring just before the announcement, raising questions about potential insider trading.
Guest Introduction: Joe Kent's Background and Investigations
The host introduces Joe Kent, detailing his extensive background as a former intelligence official, Green Beret, CIA officer, and foreign policy advisor to President Trump, noting his current FBI investigation.
Skepticism on Ceasefire and Fears of Escalation
The discussion turns to the likelihood of a US-Iran ceasefire and the potential for rapid escalation. The guest expresses doubt about a ceasefire until Israel is restrained, emphasizing the unpredictable nature of active combat.
Long-Standing Frustration with Iran Policy and Trump's Approach
The guest details their persistent frustration with the Iran policy, particularly the artificial cornering of the US. They reaffirm support for Trump's "peace through strength" approach and his potential to broker a deal with Iran.
Israeli Influence on Trump's Iran Policy and Nuclear Program Narrative
The guest explains how Israeli objectives, particularly regarding regime change in Iran, threatened Trump's potential deal. They describe how Israeli officials and media influenced the US narrative on Iran's nuclear program.
Shifting "Red Lines" on Enrichment Due to Israeli Influence
The conversation focuses on how the "red line" concerning Iran's nuclear program shifted from preventing weapons to halting enrichment, a change attributed to Israeli influence and amplified by US officials and media.
Operation Midnight Hammer and Israeli Regime Change Goals
The guest discusses Operation Midnight Hammer, an Israeli-led war, and its perception as a precursor to Israel's desired regime change in Iran.
Trump's Inner Circle and Media's Role in Echoing Israeli Talking Points
The guest highlights the tight circle of advisors around President Trump, dominated by pro-Israel figures, and the media's role in reinforcing Israeli narratives, leading to a potential confrontation with Iran.
Israeli Attack to Force US Hand in Iran Deal Negotiations
The guest suggests Israel initiated an attack to compel US action, knowing the Trump administration sought a deal with Iran, leading to US officials discussing an "imminent attack."
Iranian Retaliation and US Funding of Israel's Military
The guest questions why Iran would retaliate against the US if Israel is the aggressor, explaining that Iran is aware of Israel's offensive capabilities being heavily funded by the US.
Israel's Reliance on US Military Support for Major Operations
The guest emphasizes that while Israel excels in intelligence and assassinations, large-scale military operations and troop deployments depend on US support.
Iran's Restraint and Measured Response in Escalation
The guest notes Iran's careful observation of the escalatory ladder and their restraint in not attacking US forces unless provoked, highlighting their measured response after Operation Midnight Hammer.
Israel's Ultimate Goal: Regime Change in Iran
The guest asserts that Israel's primary objective is regime change in Iran, and their actions are geared towards achieving this, even if it risks a broader conflict.
Questioning Intelligence Sources on Iranian Enrichment
The guest questions the origin of intelligence regarding Iranian enrichment, suggesting it aligns more with Israeli talking points than verified intelligence.
Israeli Tactics in Information Warfare and Policy Influence
The guest describes how Israel uses engagements with US intelligence and diplomats to introduce information, sometimes unclassified, to influence US policy and narratives.
The "No Enrichment" Talking Point and its Israeli Origins
The guest explains how Israel promoted the "no enrichment" narrative, equating it with nuclear weapons, which deviated from the established US policy under Trump.
Israel's Strategy to Derail Trump's Iran Deal
The guest explains how Israel shifted the "red line" on enrichment through official channels and media repetition, effectively undermining a potential deal between Trump and Iran's Supreme Leader.
Addressing "Flip-Flopper" Accusations with Policy Consistency
The guest clarifies their consistent stance against a prolonged kinetic war in Iran while supporting the use of force against Iranian proxies, addressing accusations of being a "flip-flopper."
Justification for Soleimani's Killing and Avoiding Regime Change War
The guest defends Trump's decision to kill Qasem Soleimani as bold and justified, emphasizing that Trump avoided being drawn into a regime change war.
Opposition to Prolonged Kinetic Strikes in Iran
The guest reiterates their opposition to extended kinetic strikes within Iran, while acknowledging the justification for counter-battery fire against ballistic missiles.
Iran's Response to Soleimani Killing and Airliner Incident
The guest notes that after retaliating with ballistic missiles for Soleimani's death, Iran shot down a Ukrainian airliner, which effectively de-escalated the immediate conflict.
Consistent Stance Against Regime Change War in Iran
The guest clarifies they have never advocated for a regime change war in Iran, emphasizing a strategy of retaliation against direct attacks while avoiding prolonged conflict.
Iran's Deliberate and Restrained Behavior Post-Soleimani
The guest highlights Iran's deliberate and restrained actions since Soleimani's killing and Trump's return to office, noting their policy of retaliating only when directly attacked.
Differentiating Proxy Attacks from Regime Change Wars
The guest distinguishes between retaliating against Iranian proxies when they attack and engaging in a regime change war, advocating for de-escalation and the avoidance of prolonged conflicts.
Effectiveness of Stance and Agreement on Iraq War Mistake
The guest discusses the effectiveness of their approach and the use of EFP bombs by Iran, acknowledging a shared view that the Iraq war was a mistake.
Attempting Regime Change Strengthens Iranian Hardliners
The guest argues that attempts to overthrow the Iranian regime would empower hardliners and the IRGC, fostering a "rally around the flag" effect.
Consequences of Killing Iranian Leaders and Potential for Nuclear Prohibition
The guest explains that eliminating Iranian leaders, particularly moderates, could lead to the rise of hardliners, potentially resulting in a prohibition on nuclear weapons development.
Internal Tensions in Iran: Clerics vs. IRGC
The guest describes internal divisions in Iran between clerics and the IRGC, noting the IRGC's composition of experienced fighters potentially more inclined towards conflict.
Escalation, Increased Terrorism, and Strait of Hormuz Importance
The guest warns that empowering the IRGC could lead to increased conflict and terrorism, especially given the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz.
Geostrategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz for Global Energy
The Strait of Hormuz is identified as a critical choke point for global energy, with 20-25% of the world's oil passing through it, making the conflict a major geostrategic and economic issue.
Global Discontent and Iranian Proxies' Actions
The guest notes global anger towards the US due to the conflict and mentions Iranian proxies targeting US service members in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Justifications for War with Iran vs. Actual Reasons for US Involvement
The guest argues that while justifications for war with Iran exist, they are not the true reasons for US involvement and have not been clearly articulated by officials.
Advocating for Limited Strikes, Not Regime Change
The guest advocates for limited strikes against Iranian proxies or infrastructure when necessary but strongly opposes a regime change war, citing Israel's proficiency in targeted operations.
Trump's Strategy: Force, Economic Power, and Diplomacy
The guest praises Trump's strategy of employing force when required, combined with economic pressure and diplomacy, citing the maximum pressure sanctions imposed on Iran.
Economic Pressure and Protests in Iran
The guest notes that economic pressure from Trump's sanctions triggered protests in Iran against the regime due to the rising cost of living.
Striking Iran Undermines Protests and Strengthens Regime
The guest argues that striking Iran, especially with Israeli involvement, would undermine the organic protest movement and foster a "rally around the flag" effect, strengthening the regime.
Betrayal of Kurds and Mistrust in US Alliances
The guest criticizes the US for abandoning the Kurds in Iraq and Syria, leading to their demise, and questions why the US would expect Kurdish support in the current conflict.
Israeli Media Campaigns and Igniting Persian Pride
The guest suggests Israel may have used media campaigns to fabricate narratives of Kurdish support and emphasizes that striking Iran would ignite Persian pride, rallying the population.
Differing Strategic Goals: US vs. Israel in Middle East Conflicts
The guest highlights the starkly different strategic goals between the US and Israel, with Israel exhibiting a higher tolerance for chaos and bloodshed to achieve regime change.
Stated US Strategic Goals vs. Israel's Clear Objective
The guest lists stated US strategic goals but argues the US lacks a clear overarching strategy, unlike Israel's unambiguous goal of regime change in Iran.
Israel's Unwavering Goal: Regime Change in Iran
The guest reiterates that Israel's strategic objective is unequivocally to remove the current regime in Iran, irrespective of the resulting chaos.
Israeli Indifference to Chaos and War Consequences
The guest points out Israel's lack of concern regarding potential chaos, migration crises, or ongoing wars in Iran, as long as the IRGC and Ayatollahs cannot fund proxies or threaten Israel.
US Bearing the Brunt of Conflict While Israel Drives It
The guest emphasizes that the US bears the financial burden, conducts the majority of combat, and suffers casualties, while having unclear strategic objectives, whereas Israel is the primary driver of the conflict.
Restraining Israel: The Crucial Step for De-escalation
The guest asserts that restraining Israel and rectifying the US-Israel relationship is the most critical step to de-escalate the conflict and prevent further US involvement.
Lack of Articulated US Strategic Goal in Partnership
The guest believes the US strategic goal remains unarticulated, contrasting with Israel's clear objectives, leading to a disconnect in their partnership.
Tactical Objectives vs. a True Strategic Goal
The guest distinguishes between the US listing tactical targets for bombing and a genuine strategic goal, arguing the former does not constitute the latter.
Concerns Over Potential US Ground Troop Deployment in Iran
The guest expresses significant concerns about the potential deployment of US ground troops to Iran, citing a Washington Post article and labeling it a "disaster."
Krag Island Deployment: A "Fishbowl" for Iranian Attacks
The guest describes a potential Krag Island deployment as placing US service members in a vulnerable "fishbowl" for Iran to attack, questioning the strategy's rationale.
Questioning the Originator of the Troop Deployment Strategy
The guest questions who conceived the strategy of deploying troops to Iran, suggesting it sounds more like Lindsey Graham's proposals than a sound military plan.
Pragmatic Voices Being Ignored in the Administration
The guest believes that pragmatic voices and concerns are being disregarded within the administration, despite claims of thorough planning.
Problematic Formulas for Ground Troop Deployment in Iran
The guest states that most proposed formulas for deploying ground troops in Iran are flawed and represent poor planning, as Iran is prepared for such a scenario.
Handing Iran a Strategic Victory Through Troop Deployment
The guest argues that deploying US troops to Iran would grant Iran a strategic advantage, enabling them to inflict casualties and trap the US in a prolonged conflict.
The "Lost Too Much" Argument Perpetuating Conflicts
The guest points out the recurring argument used to justify continued engagement in conflicts: "We've lost too much here," which leads to perpetual involvement.
Criticism of Flippant Talk About Taking Iranian Islands
The guest criticizes individuals like Lindsey Graham for casually discussing taking islands and oil in Iran, stating that such actions in the current context would make troops vulnerable targets.
Questioning Trump's Reliance on Bad Advice
The guest questions why President Trump would heed advice from career bureaucrats like Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz over more experienced individuals.
Need for Better Advice for President Trump
The guest believes numerous experienced individuals within the government could offer superior advice to President Trump, helping him navigate the current complex situation.
Key Individuals Capable of Offering Better Advice
The guest suggests that the Vice President, DNI Gabbard, and their respective teams are crucial individuals who could provide better counsel to the President.
President's Reliance on Specific Advisors Over Others
The guest speculates that the President may not be prioritizing advice from his own Vice President, instead leaning more heavily on advisors like Lindsey Graham and Mark Levin.
Media Echo Chamber and Israeli Talking Points Amplification
The guest believes the media ecosystem, particularly figures like Mark Levin, significantly amplified Israeli talking points regarding "no enrichment" and the necessity of immediate strikes.
The False Narrative of a "Cakewalk" in Iran
The guest discusses the misleading narrative that striking Iran would be a simple "cakewalk" leading to easy regime change and a favorable deal, similar to the perceived success in Venezuela.
Echoes of Iraq War Proponents in Current Iran Debate
The guest notes that many media figures who advocated for the Iraq war are now promoting a similar narrative for a conflict with Iran, suggesting a swift and uncomplicated outcome.
Current Troop Numbers and Israel's Limited Contribution
The guest inquires about the current US troop deployment numbers and Israel's contribution, noting that Israel's primary military operations are focused on Lebanon.
Israel's Limited Ground Force Capability and US Dependence
The guest explains that Israel lacks the capacity for significant ground force deployment and would rely on the US for such operations.
Intense Anger Over the Prospect of a New War
The guest expresses strong anger and frustration regarding the potential for a new war, emphasizing that the current situation is avoidable.
Importance of Public Voice and Call to Action for Citizens
The guest stresses the significance of platforms like the podcast and urges listeners to contact their senators and representatives to voice their opinions and influence the media narrative.
Global Pulse on the Iran Conflict: Limited Support for Strikes
The guest discusses the global reaction to the potential conflict with Iran, expressing doubt that any country besides Israel is advocating for a strike.
China's Potential Strategic Gain from US-Iran Conflict
The guest suggests China could benefit from the conflict by diverting US attention from the Pacific and potentially profiting from increased oil prices.
Russia and China's Advantage from US Distraction
The guest believes Russia and China are likely pleased with the situation, as it distracts the US from the Pacific and allows them to capitalize on energy market dynamics.
Regional Allies' Fury Over Conflict and Market Disruption
The guest states that regional allies are likely angered by the conflict due to its disruption of energy markets and potential regional destabilization.
China's Increased Aggression Towards Taiwan Amidst Conflict
The guest notes that China has become more aggressive towards Taiwan since the conflict began, highlighting the diversion of US combat power to the Middle East.
Threat of China Seizing Chip Plants and Winning AI Race
The guest emphasizes the significant threat posed by China potentially seizing chip plants, which would enable them to dominate the AI race.
Debate Over Taiwan's Defensibility with Shifting US Focus
The guest acknowledges the ongoing debate regarding Taiwan's defensibility, particularly with US combat power redirected to the Middle East.
Weakening Dollar and the Importance of the Petro-Dollar System
The guest discusses the declining strength of the US dollar due to deficit spending and the critical role of the Petro-dollar system, where oil transactions are settled in dollars.
War in Hormuz's Impact on the Petro-Dollar System
The guest argues that a war in the Strait of Hormuz could undermine the Petro-dollar system if Iran restricts oil shipments to Chinese vessels and demands payment in other currencies.
GCC's Reliance on Petro-Dollar Amidst Security Concerns
The guest questions the GCC's continued dependence on the Petro-dollar system, given the US's perceived inability to provide adequate security guarantees against Iranian threats.
Massive Ramifications of the Conflict on Global Systems
The guest concludes that the conflict's ramifications are extensive, impacting global energy markets, economies, and international relations.
Europe's Renegotiation of Oil Contracts Due to Conflict
The guest mentions that European countries are compelled to renegotiate oil contracts due to the conflict, potentially leading to defaults on existing agreements.
Israel as the Sole Beneficiary of the Conflict
The guest asserts that Israel is the only nation benefiting from the conflict, questioning the gains for the United States.
Disagreement on US Benefit from Taking Out Iranian Regime
The guest disagrees with the notion that the US benefits from eliminating the Iranian regime, citing a lack of a viable strategy and clear advantages for the American populace.
Trump's Comments on Congressional Race and Electoral Performance
The host references President Trump's remarks about the guest's loss in a congressional race, drawing a parallel to Trump's own electoral outcomes.
Humorous Questioning of the "Real Loser"
The host humorously questions who the "real loser" is, comparing the margin of defeat in the congressional race to Trump's presidential losses.
Advertisement: Bob's Naturals Collagen Peptides
An advertisement promotes Bob's Naturals collagen peptides, highlighting benefits for joint health, skin, and recovery, and its support for veterans.
Prioritizing "Need to Know" Information Over "Nice to Know"
The podcast shifts focus to "need to know" information, emphasizing the urgency and critical nature of the topics discussed.
Senator Rubio's Role and Potential Options for the President
The guest is asked about Senator Rubio's involvement, with the response suggesting Rubio is presenting options to the president, though the specifics remain unknown.
Exploration of Other Strategic Options Beyond Military Targets
The guest is uncertain about other strategic options being considered besides military targets but acknowledges that all possibilities are likely being explored.
Discussion on Attacking Civilian Infrastructure and Military Ethics
The guest discusses potential strategies like attacking fertilizer plants, water supply, and energy grids, expressing doubt that the US military would intentionally target civilian infrastructure.
Contrasting Israeli "Total War" Values with US Approach
The guest contrasts US and Israeli values in warfare, stating that Israel engages in "total war" and "biblical wars," which differs significantly from the US approach.
US Military's Approach to Warfare and Winning
The guest suggests that the US military does not fight in a manner that prioritizes winning, unlike the Israeli approach to conflict.
American Lack of Colonial Mentality and Occupation Challenges
The guest argues that Americans lack the colonial or total war mentality, which contributes to their ineffectiveness as occupying forces.
Partnership with Israel: Divergent Strategic Goals and Values
The guest reiterates that the US cannot be closely aligned with Israel in conflicts due to differing strategic goals and values, particularly concerning the domination of populations.
Differentiating US and Israeli Goals in Partnership
The guest believes it's impossible to distinguish US and Israeli goals within their partnership, as the US is essentially funding Israel's actions.
Asserting US Dominance in the Bilateral Relationship
The guest emphasizes that the US, as the dominant partner, must assert its authority and direct actions, rather than being dictated to by a foreign government.
Issue with US Government's Reaction to Israeli Influence
The guest clarifies that their concern is not with Israelis themselves but with the US government's reactions and its direction from a foreign government.
Israeli Influence on the Iraq and Syria Wars
The guest links the Iraq and Syria wars to Israeli influence, citing Netanyahu's lobbying for the Iraq war based on WMD claims.
Israeli Goals in Iraq and Syria: Regime Change and Iran
The guest explains that Israel supported the Iraq war to establish a base for operations into Syria and ultimately target Iran, with bipartisan backing from major Israeli parties.
US Mishandling of Post-Iraq War Leading to Iranian Influence
The guest details how the US mishandled the post-Iraq war period, allowing Iran to gain control through proxies and strengthen its regional position.
Formation of the "Shia Crescent" and Iranian Influence
The guest describes the creation of the "Shia Crescent" (Tehran, Baghdad, Damascus) as a land bridge for Iranian supplies, a development that concerned Israel.
Israeli Push for War in Syria to Disrupt Shia Crescent
Following the outcome of the Iraq war, Israel advocated for war in Syria to dismantle the Shia Crescent and overthrow Assad, who supported Hezbollah and Hamas.
Rise of ISIS and US Collaboration in Syria
The guest explains that the US collaborated with Sunni populations in Syria, contributing to the rise of Al-Qaeda and subsequently ISIS, with Hillary Clinton's emails confirming support for the Free Syrian Army.
Personal Loss in the Fight Against ISIS
The guest reveals the personal tragedy of losing their late wife in the fight against ISIS, a conflict that stemmed from US involvement in Syria.
Israel as the Driving Force Behind Middle East Conflicts
The guest asserts that Israel has been the primary catalyst for US involvement in Middle East conflicts, from the ousting of Saddam Hussein to targeting Assad and now Iran.
US Handing Syria to Al-Qaeda Leader: A Strategic Failure
The guest criticizes the US for ceding control of Syria to an Al-Qaeda leader after Assad's fall, highlighting a significant strategic misstep.
Deception and Public Relations in Geopolitics
The guest suggests that deceptive tactics and effective public relations can mislead Americans, citing the example of a terrorist leader rebranding himself.
Trump's Initial Syria Approach: Caliphate Destruction and Withdrawal
The guest recalls President Trump's initial plan for Syria: eliminate the caliphate and withdraw, a strategy they supported but which faced military resistance.
Trump's Stance on Syria Post-Assad's Fall and HTS Rise
After Assad's downfall and the emergence of HTS, President Trump declared that events in Syria were "not our business," a stance the guest deemed appropriate.
Criticism of US Involvement with the Shahra Government in Syria
The guest criticizes the US for fully supporting the Shahra government in Syria, despite its problematic nature.
Warning Against Never-Ending Middle East Quagmires
The guest warns that the Middle East is a region prone to perpetual quagmires, offering no clear benefits to the American people.
IAEA Inspections and Trump's Withdrawal from JCPOA
The guest discusses IAEA inspections in Iran and President Trump's decision to withdraw from the JCPOA, which included the cessation of these inspections.
JCPOA's Impact on Iran's Financial Resources
The guest explains that the JCPOA enabled Iran to access more capital through sanctions circumvention, referencing the "pallets of cash" incident.
Sanctions Relief Tied to Inspector Access Under JCPOA
The guest notes that sanctions relief was contingent on inspector access within the JCPOA framework, and withdrawing from the deal complicated inspector access.
Trump's Leverage and Iran's Restraint Post-Soleimani Killing
The guest reiterates that Trump effectively used leverage, including the killing of Soleimani, and that Iran exercised restraint with its proxies even during the initial conflict.
Lack of US Gain from Current Actions, Israel Benefits Most
The guest questions the rationale behind current actions, emphasizing the absence of US gain and highlighting Israel as the primary beneficiary.
Sarah Adams' Claims on Terrorist Sleeper Cells in the US
The guest discusses Sarah Adams' assertions regarding thousands of terrorist sleeper cells in the US and the difficulty in determining if Iran activates them.
Uncertainty About the Number of Suspected Terrorists in the US
The guest testifies that the NCTC identified 18,000 suspected terrorists with access to America, but further investigation revealed less certainty about who is actually present.
Border Security Deficiencies and Parole Status Issues
The guest highlights inadequate border security, the CBP One app, and the parole status granted to individuals, making it challenging to track who is within the US.
Murky Data on Individuals Entering from Iran or Lebanon
The guest describes the data on individuals entering the country from Iran or Lebanon as unclear, similar to border statistics, emphasizing the lack of knowledge about their presence.
Urgent Need for Homeland Security Focus and Tracking Entrants
The guest stresses the necessity of prioritizing homeland security, identifying individuals who entered the country in the last four years, and potentially initiating removals.
Lone Actor Threat vs. Organized Cells in Terrorism
The guest believes the primary threat stems from lone actors inspired by media rather than organized cells, making detection more challenging.
US Intelligence Effectiveness Against Organized Cells vs. Lone Actors
The guest acknowledges the US intelligence community's proficiency against organized cells but notes the difficulty in detecting lone actors motivated by media content.
Media Content as a Driver of Recent Attacks in the US
The guest points to recent attacks in the US inspired by media content, particularly related to the Gaza conflict, as a significant factor contributing to violence.
Iranian T-shirt Incident and University of Virginia Attack
The guest mentions an attacker in Texas wearing an Iran t-shirt and the University of Virginia attack, questioning any potential connection to Iran.
Communication Methods of Terrorist Cells and Detection Challenges
The guest discusses the possibility of terrorist cells communicating via couriers, making them difficult to detect.
Open Borders as an Opportunity for Enemies to Exploit the US
The guest argues that the open border policy over the past four years has created a significant opportunity for adversaries to exploit the country and inflict harm.
Uncertainty Regarding the Exact Number of "Bad Guys" in the US
The guest admits uncertainty about the precise number of "bad guys" in the country, stating that increased investigation reveals less definitive knowledge.
Confidence Level in Identifying Iranian Proxy Attacks
The guest expresses uncertainty about being completely confident in identifying whether Iran is behind a specific proxy attack.
Keywords
Tulsi Gabbard
A politician and former member of the U.S. House of Representatives. The speaker discusses her difficult political position and the challenges she faces.
Government Employees
Individuals employed by the government. The speaker describes them as often prioritizing pleasing their superiors and avoiding workplace friction over their duty to serve the public.
Military Service
The act of serving in the armed forces. The speaker reflects on his own 20+ years of service and the dilemmas faced by those currently serving.
Speaking Out
Expressing one's opinions or beliefs publicly. The speaker discusses the courage required to speak out against perceived wrongdoings, especially after experiencing personal loss.
Accountability
The obligation to accept responsibility for one's actions. The speaker calls for leaders within the Trump administration to be accountable for their decisions and actions.
Iran Conflict
The ongoing geopolitical tensions and potential military actions involving Iran. The speaker proposes specific strategies to de-escalate the situation and find a diplomatic resolution.
Restraining Israel
Limiting the offensive capabilities and actions of Israel. The speaker suggests this as a key strategy to influence the Iran conflict and encourage diplomatic solutions.
Diplomatic Solutions
Resolving conflicts through negotiation and dialogue rather than force. The speaker advocates for diplomatic engagement with Iran, involving regional allies.
Sanctions Relief
The easing or removal of economic penalties imposed on a country. Offering sanctions relief on Iranian oil is proposed as a bargaining chip to bring Iran to the negotiating table.
President Trump
The 45th President of the United States. The speaker believes Trump has the potential to take decisive action to resolve the current international crisis.
Intelligence Vetting
The process of verifying the accuracy and reliability of intelligence information. The speaker explains how this process can be circumvented by foreign entities.
Israeli Lobby
Organizations that advocate for Israeli interests in the United States, such as AIPAC. Their influence on US policy and political donations is discussed.
National Security
The protection of a nation from threats, both foreign and domestic. The speaker emphasizes its importance and discusses various aspects related to it, including counter-terrorism and border security.
MAGA Movement
A political slogan and movement associated with Donald Trump. The speaker discusses its current state, including perceived divisions and its potential impact on future elections.
Glyphosate
A widely used herbicide. The speaker raises concerns about its prevalence and potential health impacts, questioning why it's not treated as a national security issue.
Combat Loadout
The equipment and weapons carried by a soldier during combat. The speaker details their personal loadout from past missions and discusses modern advancements.
Drones and Counter-Drones
Unmanned aerial vehicles and systems designed to counter them. The speaker identifies this technology as a critical aspect of modern warfare that requires attention.
Draft (Military)
Compulsory enlistment for military service. The speaker discusses its potential impact on public support for wars and its role in preventing prolonged conflicts.
Homeland Security
Measures taken to protect a nation's borders and citizens from threats. The speaker prioritizes this, especially in light of concerns about open borders.
Foreign Agent Registration
Legal requirements for individuals or entities acting on behalf of foreign governments. The speaker discusses the limitations and effectiveness of such regulations.
Money in Politics
The role of financial contributions in political campaigns and policy-making. The speaker highlights its corrupting influence and the impact of Super PACs.
Q&A
What is the speaker's proposed solution to de-escalate the conflict with Iran?
The speaker suggests restraining Israel by limiting their offensive capabilities and defense funding. They also propose engaging regional allies to bring Iran to the negotiating table and potentially lifting some sanctions on Iranian oil as a diplomatic incentive.
Why does the speaker believe President Trump is uniquely positioned to resolve the current international crisis?
The speaker believes Trump is known for his ability to take decisive and drastic action. While acknowledging the urgency, they feel he has the potential to extricate the US from the complex situation, unlike other presidents.
What factors contribute to the perceived reluctance to take stronger action against Israel?
The speaker attributes this reluctance to the influence of the Israeli lobby (like AIPAC), significant financial donations from pro-Israel individuals and groups, and the strong support from the evangelical community in America.
How can foreign entities influence US policy, according to the speaker?
Foreign entities can influence policy by bypassing official intelligence vetting processes. They can provide information directly to key decision-makers, who may not be familiar with intelligence protocols, thus shaping perceptions and decisions.
What is the speaker's view on the current state of the MAGA movement?
The speaker believes the MAGA coalition has become significantly fractured due to recent actions and policies. They emphasize the need for seriousness in delivering on promises and correcting course to preserve the movement's integrity and future success.
What are the speaker's future aspirations and how do they plan to serve the country?
The speaker aims to influence policy by reaching the President and serving in a national security capacity. They want to leverage their experiences to ensure the country's future and prioritize national security interests.
What are the speaker's concerns regarding the influence of money in politics?
The speaker believes the Supreme Court's ruling equating money with speech has corrupted the political system, allowing elections to be bought through unlimited Super PAC donations. This financial influence leads to politicians being "bought."
What is the speaker's advice for young people considering military service amidst current conflicts?
The speaker advises young people to carefully examine the objectives and agendas of any potential military engagement. They stress the importance of prioritizing the well-being of fellow soldiers and making a well-informed decision about risking one's life.
How does the speaker believe a draft would impact the likelihood of prolonged wars?
The speaker argues that a draft would act as a check on the government's ability to engage in prolonged wars. By spreading the burden of service across the entire population, it would make it harder to sustain wars that lack broad public support.
What does the speaker identify as the most pressing threats to the United States?
The speaker prioritizes homeland security, citing concerns about open borders and the potential influx of terrorists. They also acknowledge ongoing counter-terrorism threats from groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS, and the strategic advantage China gains from current global conflicts.
Show Notes
Joe Kent is a retired U.S. Army Special Forces officer, former CIA paramilitary officer, and until recently served as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, stepping down from the post in March 2026 following a principled disagreement over U.S. policy in the Iran war.
An Oregon native and graduate of Norwich University in Strategic Defense Analysis, Kent served in the U.S. Army for 20 years, completing 11 combat deployments across the Middle East and other high-threat regions. His military career included service with the 75th Ranger Regiment, Army Special Forces, and U.S. Army Special Operations Command, earning numerous commendations, including six bronze stars. After retiring from the Army in 2018, he served as a paramilitary officer in the CIA's Special Activities Center.
Kent brought decades of frontline counterterrorism experience to the role, shaped in part by personal sacrifice: in 2019, his wife, Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer Shannon Kent, was killed in a suicide bombing while serving in Syria.
Follow the markets:
https://polymarket.com/event/us-x-iran-ceasefire-by
https://polymarket.com/event/us-forces-enter-iran-by
Shawn Ryan Show Sponsors:
Live better longer with BUBS Naturals. Get 20% OFF on collagen, MCT creamers, and more with code SHAWN at https://bubsnaturals.com/srs
Ready to upgrade your eyewear? Check them out at https://roka.com and use code SRS for 20% off sitewide.
Joe Kent Links:
X - https://x.com/joekent16jan19
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Table of contents
United States
