A long time ago, in a movie theater downtown, we all hated "The Phantom Menace." Now we rethink everything we ever knew about this controversial film and break down what the movie got right!

Today's round is based on the fine work of CNN's Brian Lowry in his article As ‘The Phantom Menace’ turns 25, six (non-Jar Jar) things the ‘Star Wars’ prequel got right.

Round 284!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please support us on the Beer Thursday Patreon page!

At the $10 level, the next 18 Great Human Beings will get access to the Beer Thursday Facebook group.

Never miss a round and be a part of our journey to the top by subscribing and leaving a 5-star review on your favorite podcasting app. Your support means the world to us!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here's what our house elf, Artie (not Archie), says about this round:

The Phantom Menace: The Star Wars Movie That Wasn't So Bad After All

In this round, we dive into a debate about "The Phantom Menace" and its place in the Star Wars universe.

Is the movie really as bad as some claim? We discuss six things that "The Phantom Menace" got right. From the Emperor's long game to the digital effects, the casting of Ewan McGregor and Liam Neeson, and, of course, the epic lightsaber duels, we cover it all.

Your Force-Ghost hosts provide their thoughts on these key aspects, with humor and some controversial takes along the way. Plus, a toast to Star Wars and a surprising defense of Jar Jar Binks!

Whether you're a Star Wars purist or a casual fan, join us for an engaging and entertaining discussion. May the Force be with you!