#8: Does the jury's use of playback tools to enhance video evidence result in juror misconduct?

Update: 2018-10-29

Description

People v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).

We analyze the juror misconduct issues in the case of People v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).

The issues we’re going to discuss are playback tools the jury uses when video evidence is sent back to the jury room and whether changing the contrast ratio on a TV monitor amounts to new evidence.

Remember to use the coupon code "podcast25", exclusively for our podcast listeners, for $25 off our CLE entitled, "Facebook & Today's Juror: 2017's 10 Biggest Juror Misconduct Events" which has been accredited & approved for 1.5 general CLE credit hours in 30 states. Click here to register for our CLE.

Don't let juror misconduct taint your next verdict...

Comments

In Channel

#27: What to do with the laughing juror

2019-12-1211:55

The SM JUROR Podcast #26: Does the jury's inadvertent consideration of the defendant's insurance policy result in prejudicial juror misconduct?

2019-10-1910:24

#25: Does the jury’s knowledge of publicized videotaped trial proceedings on social media prejudice the defendant?

2019-10-1417:04

#24: Exploring the relationship between the juror and the trial witness

2019-10-0709:32

#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

2019-06-2215:38

#22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

2019-05-2711:47

#21: The injection of a juror's personal experiences and a juror's translation efforts

2018-12-1717:41

#20: A LinkedIn notification of the viewing of a party’s profile leads to research of social media profiles & Google search histories to prove juror misconduct.

2018-12-1526:36

#19: Does a text message to a juror, “Please don’t send my brother to jail,” result in jury tampering?

2018-12-1213:47

#18: Trivial juror misconduct and the ineffective assistance of counsel claim

2018-12-1010:27

#17: The delay in presenting known juror misconduct backfires

2018-12-0707:51

#16: The juror who says he will find the defendant guilty regardless of the evidence

2018-12-0507:51

#15: Rebutting the presumption of prejudice when jurors do internet research

2018-12-0310:28

#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?

2018-11-3007:37

#13: Does an alternate juror's presence in the jury room during deliberations result in improper communications?

2018-11-1912:47

#12: Can the bailiff's interactions with a juror, who wants to be excused, lead to a new trial?

2018-11-1420:06

#11: The trial court's broad discretion in investigating juror misconduct

2018-11-0710:01

#10: The request to release the jury’s contact information because one juror conducted internet research