DiscoverIn the Privy CouncilAttorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T
Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

Update: 2023-10-19
Share

Description

This week, it’s a momentous case of constitutional law from Trinidad & Tobago, in a judgment from Sir Rabinder Singh, as we consider the constitutionality of sedition laws. Is sedition to ovague an offence to be legally certain? Can a guarantee of a ‘democratic’ State in the constitution be enough to strike a law down? Does Australian case law have any relevance? Listen to find out!


Link to Case: [2023] UKPC 36, T&T


Legal Style Blog homepage


Twitter: @legalstyleblog


E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk


Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

Attorney General v Maharaj [2023] UKPC 36, T&T

Elijah Granet