![Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T](https://s3.castbox.fm/27/87/f9/007ec3e9b82f788ba2e8eff748e119da9d_scaled_v1_400.jpg "Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T")
Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T
Update: 2023-07-26
Description
In this episode, we look at the issue of unjust enrichment and the stultification (blocking or interference with) of public policy defence. In one corner, Lord Burrows (for the majority) argues a restitutionary remedy is sufficiently distinct to avoid stultifying legislation about public contracts. In the other, Lord Briggs of Westbourne argues that public policy should win out over restitution. Who is right?
Link to case: [2023] UKPC 26, T&T
E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk
Comments
In Channel
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
United States00:00
00:00
x
