Bad economics, smart politics
Digest
This podcast delves into the complex interplay between economics and politics in the US, focusing on the proposed sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel and the broader trend of protectionism. The episode highlights the conflicting perspectives on the US Steel deal, with economists arguing for its economic benefits and politicians expressing concerns about national security and job losses. The podcast further examines how political considerations are driving economic policy in battleground states, leading to populist policies that may not be economically sound. This is particularly evident in the debate over the US Steel deal, where both candidates oppose the deal despite its potential economic benefits. The episode explores the rise of protectionist policies in the US, driven by a desire to revive manufacturing and protect American jobs. However, experts argue that protectionism can harm the economy in the long run, leading to lower productivity and wages. The podcast highlights the bipartisan nature of protectionist sentiment in the US, with both candidates embracing protectionist policies despite their potential economic drawbacks. This reflects a broader sense of economic insecurity and a desire for greater economic control. The episode concludes by emphasizing that the distortion of economics by populist and protectionist politics is not a new phenomenon. It is a long-standing trend that is particularly visible in battleground states, where political considerations often outweigh economic realities.
Outlines
The US Steel Deal: Economics vs. Politics and the Rise of Protectionism
This episode explores the controversy surrounding the proposed sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel, highlighting the clash between economic arguments for the deal and political opposition based on nationalistic sentiment. It also examines the broader trend of protectionism in the US, driven by a desire to revive manufacturing and protect American jobs.
The Economy and Populist Politics in Battleground States
The episode discusses how the economy is a central issue in the upcoming election, with both candidates focusing on manufacturing and jobs. However, the economic arguments presented by the candidates are often at odds with sound economic principles. The episode examines how political considerations are driving economic policy in battleground states, leading to populist policies that may not be economically sound.
The Long-Term Impact of Protectionism and Populist Politics
The episode explores the long-term impact of protectionist policies and populist politics on the US economy. Experts argue that protectionism can harm the economy in the long run, leading to lower productivity and wages. The episode concludes by emphasizing that the distortion of economics by populist and protectionist politics is not a new phenomenon. It is a long-standing trend that is particularly visible in battleground states, where political considerations often outweigh economic realities.
Keywords
Protectionism
Protectionism refers to government policies aimed at shielding domestic industries from foreign competition through measures like tariffs, quotas, and subsidies. It aims to protect domestic jobs and industries but can lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced economic efficiency.
Populist Politics
Populist politics often appeals to the common person and emphasizes nationalistic sentiment, often opposing globalization and foreign influence. It can lead to policies that prioritize short-term gains over long-term economic stability.
Battleground States
Battleground states are those with a close electoral history, making them crucial for presidential elections. They often become focal points for political campaigns and policy debates, as candidates seek to win over voters in these states.
Foreign Investment
Foreign investment refers to the flow of capital from one country to another, often in the form of direct investment in companies or infrastructure. It can boost economic growth, create jobs, and transfer technology, but can also raise concerns about national security and job displacement.
Manufacturing Revival
The manufacturing revival refers to efforts to revitalize the manufacturing sector in the US, often through policies aimed at supporting domestic production and creating jobs. It is a key issue in the current election, with both candidates promising to bring back manufacturing jobs.
US Steel Deal
The proposed sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel, a Japanese steel company, has sparked controversy due to concerns about foreign ownership and potential job losses.
Economic Policy
Economic policy refers to government actions aimed at influencing the economy, such as taxation, spending, and regulation. It can be influenced by political considerations, leading to policies that may not be economically sound.
Q&A
What is the main point of contention surrounding the US Steel deal?
The main point of contention is whether the economic benefits of the deal outweigh the potential risks to American jobs and national security. Economists argue that the deal will save jobs and strengthen the steel industry, while politicians express concerns about foreign ownership and job losses.
How are political considerations influencing economic policy in battleground states?
Political considerations are driving populist policies that may not be economically sound. Candidates are prioritizing short-term gains, such as protecting jobs, over long-term economic stability, leading to policies like protectionism that can harm the economy in the long run.
What is the broader trend driving the rise of protectionism in the US?
The rise of protectionism is driven by a sense of economic insecurity and a desire for greater economic control. Many Americans feel that the economy has not been fair to them, leading to a desire for policies that protect domestic industries and jobs.
How do the stances of both candidates on protectionism reflect the broader political landscape?
The bipartisan nature of protectionist sentiment reflects a broader shift in the political landscape. Both candidates are embracing protectionist policies, indicating that this issue resonates with a significant portion of the electorate, regardless of party affiliation.
What is the long-term impact of the distortion of economics by populist and protectionist politics?
The distortion of economics by populist and protectionist politics can lead to lower productivity, reduced economic efficiency, and a decline in long-term economic growth. It can also create a climate of uncertainty and instability, making it difficult for businesses to invest and grow.
Show Notes
Related episodes:
The tensions behind the sale of U.S. Steel (Apple / Spotify)
How much do presidents ACTUALLY influence the economy (Apple / Spotify)
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.
Music by Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy