DiscoverWhat now? What next? Insights into Australia's tertiary education sectorClaire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?
Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?

Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?

Update: 2025-04-27
Share

Description

In this episode Claire gives a summary of the submissions to the Senate Committee's inquiry into the Quality of governance at Australian higher education providers.

During the episode Claire references her interview in episode 123 with NTEU representatives Emily Foley and Tony Williams about their experiences working as casual academics in Australian universities.

The submissions to the Senate Committee's inquiry can all be read and downloaded from the inquiry webpage: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_and_Employment/UniversityGovernance/Submissions

The SuperFriend data mentioned in the episode is at: https://www.superfriend.com.au/research/workplace-mental-health-statistics

And Claire forgot to include the submission number for Prof. Gavin Nicholson's submission - it's number 21.

Contact Claire:


The ‘What now? What next?’ podcast recognises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as Australia’s traditional custodians. In the spirit of reconciliation we are proud to recommend John Briggs Consulting as a leader in Reconciliation and Indigenous engagement. To find out more go to www.johnbriggs.net.au

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
1.0x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?

Claire's summary of submissions to the University Governance inquiry - who argued for what?