Could the War in Gaza Cost Kamala Harris the Election?
1Digest
The Uncommitted Movement, a group of Palestinian-American voters in Michigan, is protesting US policy on Israel and refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for president. The movement's founder, Abbas al-Awiyah, expresses frustration with the Harris campaign's lack of engagement on the issue, citing his personal experiences with war. The movement has issued a "non-endorsement" of Harris, meaning they will not actively campaign for her but will not necessarily vote for Trump or a third-party candidate either. This decision stems from their deep dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The chapter explores the potential impact of the Uncommitted movement on the Michigan election, acknowledging their significant numbers but uncertainty about their ability to sway enough votes to affect the outcome. The broader political implications of the movement's stance are also discussed, highlighting the tension between party unity and the need for change on critical issues.
Outlines
The Uncommitted Movement and the 2024 Election
This chapter explores the "Uncommitted" movement, a group of Palestinian-American voters in Michigan who are protesting US policy on Israel and refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for president. The movement's founder, Abbas al-Awiyah, discusses his personal experiences with war and his frustration with the Harris campaign's lack of engagement on the issue.
The Uncommitted Movement's Non-Endorsement and its Impact
The Uncommitted movement has issued a "non-endorsement" of Kamala Harris, meaning they will not actively campaign for her but will not necessarily vote for Trump or a third-party candidate either. The movement's leader, Abbas al-Awiyah, explains the reasoning behind this decision, highlighting the deep frustration with the Democratic Party's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Political Implications of the Uncommitted Movement
This chapter discusses the potential impact of the Uncommitted movement on the Michigan election. While the movement's numbers are significant, it's unclear if they can sway enough votes to affect the outcome. The chapter also explores the broader political implications of the movement's stance, highlighting the tension between party unity and the need for change on critical issues.
Keywords
Uncommitted Movement
A group of Palestinian-American voters in Michigan who are protesting US policy on Israel and refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for president. They are frustrated with the Democratic Party's lack of engagement on the issue and believe that Harris's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not sufficiently different from Biden's.
Non-Endorsement
A political strategy where a group or individual does not actively campaign for a candidate but does not necessarily vote for their opponent either. The Uncommitted movement has issued a non-endorsement of Kamala Harris, highlighting their dissatisfaction with her stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Palestinian-American Voters
A growing segment of the American electorate who are increasingly vocal about their concerns regarding US policy on Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Uncommitted movement is a prime example of how this group is mobilizing to exert political influence.
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
A long-standing and complex geopolitical conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, with deep historical and religious roots. The conflict has been a major source of tension in the Middle East and has significant implications for US foreign policy.
Democratic Party
One of the two major political parties in the United States. The Democratic Party is generally considered to be more progressive on social issues and more supportive of international cooperation. However, the party's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been criticized by some Palestinian-American voters.
Swing State
A state in the United States where the outcome of a presidential election is uncertain and could potentially swing the election in favor of either candidate. Michigan is considered a swing state, making the Uncommitted movement's potential impact on the election even more significant.
Q&A
What is the Uncommitted movement and what are their goals?
The Uncommitted movement is a group of Palestinian-American voters in Michigan who are protesting US policy on Israel and refusing to endorse Kamala Harris for president. They are frustrated with the Democratic Party's lack of engagement on the issue and believe that Harris's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not sufficiently different from Biden's. Their goal is to pressure the Democratic Party to adopt a more pro-Palestinian stance and to ensure that the US takes a more active role in ending the conflict.
Why has the Uncommitted movement chosen to issue a non-endorsement of Kamala Harris?
The Uncommitted movement has issued a non-endorsement of Kamala Harris because they believe that her stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not sufficiently different from Biden's. They are also frustrated with the Democratic Party's lack of engagement on the issue and believe that Harris has not made a strong enough commitment to Palestinian rights.
What are the potential implications of the Uncommitted movement's stance on the Michigan election?
The Uncommitted movement's stance could potentially have a significant impact on the Michigan election. While their numbers are significant, it's unclear if they can sway enough votes to affect the outcome. However, their decision to not endorse Harris could potentially hurt her chances of winning the state, especially if the race is close.
What are the broader political implications of the Uncommitted movement's stance?
The Uncommitted movement's stance highlights the tension between party unity and the need for change on critical issues. While the Democratic Party is generally considered to be more progressive on social issues, its stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been criticized by some Palestinian-American voters. The Uncommitted movement's decision to not endorse Harris could potentially force the Democratic Party to reconsider its stance on the issue and to engage more actively with Palestinian-American voters.
Show Notes
In Michigan, many voters—particularly Arab American and Muslim voters—remain deeply upset by the Biden Administration’s support for the Israeli military, in the face of the enormous death toll in Gaza. In her Presidential campaign, Kamala Harris has not articulated any major shift in policy. Earlier in the year, during the primary elections, activists urged Democrats to check the box for “Uncommitted,” as a rebuke to Biden. But now, just weeks away from the general election, these disaffected Democrats could cost Harris the election. Andrew Marantz, who has reported on the Uncommitted Movement, talks with one of the its founders, Abbas Alawieh, about the difficult moral calculus facing Muslim Democrats, and why the Party spurned overtures from pro-Palestinian groups. The antiwar candidate Jill Stein, of the Green Party, is now polling very well with Muslim voters, and Donald Trump’s campaign is claiming that he can stop the war; however, Uncommitted leaders feel they cannot endorse Harris. In conversation with David Remnick, Marantz recalls that Hillary Clinton lost Michigan by around ten thousand votes; more than one hundred thousand people checked “Uncommitted.”
Table of contents
United States
