DiscoverCriminal Law Department PresentsCriminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 39: U.S. v. Tapp & U.S. v. Armstrong (C.A.A.F. 2024)
Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 39: U.S. v. Tapp & U.S. v. Armstrong (C.A.A.F. 2024)

Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 39: U.S. v. Tapp & U.S. v. Armstrong (C.A.A.F. 2024)

Update: 2024-08-14
Share

Description

This episode examines two cases with very similar lessons for practitioners. Specifically, we examine the judicial disqualification rule under Rule for Court-Martial 902, and the caselaw surrounding prejudice. The CAAF highlights for practitioners yet again how important it is for practitioners to build a record.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 39: U.S. v. Tapp & U.S. v. Armstrong (C.A.A.F. 2024)

Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 39: U.S. v. Tapp & U.S. v. Armstrong (C.A.A.F. 2024)

Unknown Author