DiscoverNew DiscoursesCritical Theorists as Grand Inquisitors: The Logic of "Repressive Tolerance"
Critical Theorists as Grand Inquisitors: The Logic of "Repressive Tolerance"

Critical Theorists as Grand Inquisitors: The Logic of "Repressive Tolerance"

Update: 2021-02-085
Share

Description

The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 20
Repressive Tolerance Series, Part 4 of 4

In this fourth and final part of his four-part lecture series about "Repressive Tolerance," James Lindsay takes the reader from the darkest point of the essay, which was the exciting climax of Part 3, through the end of Marcuse's argument. In this part, Marcuse dedicates the rest of the original 1965 essay to explaining why it is him and people like him (that is, Critical Theorists) who get to decide what constitutes good violence and bad violence, truth and falsity, liberating tolerance from the kind that must not be tolerated and must be suppressed. In our own time, it is the Woke and the high-powered elites in government, media, education, and law who have taken up this mantle of being able to decide, in the spirit of Herbert Marcuse, what must be tolerated, no matter how bad it is, and what must be suppressed, no matter how legitimate it is. The parallels to our own time are undeniable, and, as Lindsay has claimed throughout, the unavoidable conclusion is that we live in the asymmetric and totalitarian logic of "Repressive Tolerance" today.

The second half of this episode leaves the essay itself and dives into a postscript to the original essay that Marcuse added three years later, in 1968, after the logic of his essay had already caused innumerable riots and episodes of civil unrest at the end of that tumultuous and transformational decade. In exploring this postscript, we see Marcuse sticking to his guns, but we also see just how blatantly obvious it is that his repressive tolerance has become the monster it sought to slay, which sheds considerable light upon what some people are now calling "the Great Realignment" in our societies, cultures, and politics.

Support New Discourses:
paypal.me/newdiscourses
newdiscourses.locals.com/support
patreon.com/newdiscourses
subscribestar.com/newdiscourses
youtube.com/channel/UC9K5PLkj0N_b9JTPdSRwPkg/join

Website:
newdiscourses.com

Follow:
facebook.com/newdiscourses
twitter.com/NewDiscourses
instagram.com/newdiscourses
newdiscourses.locals.com
pinterest.com/newdiscourses
linkedin.com/company/newdiscourses
minds.com/newdiscourses
reddit.com/r/NewDiscourses

Podcast:
@newdiscourses
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/new-…es/id1499880546
bit.ly/NDGooglePodcasts
open.spotify.com/show/0HfzDaXI5L4LnJQStFWgZp
stitcher.com/podcast/new-discourses

© 2021 New Discourses. All rights reserved.
Comments (1)

Bup Sahn

Is the swearing really necessary?

Mar 4th
Reply
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Critical Theorists as Grand Inquisitors: The Logic of "Repressive Tolerance"

Critical Theorists as Grand Inquisitors: The Logic of "Repressive Tolerance"

New Discourses