DiscoverLouder with CrowderDOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’
DOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’

DOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’

Update: 2024-09-061
Share

Digest

This podcast delves into the charges against Donald Trump, particularly those brought by Alvin Bragg in New York County. The episode features an interview with Nicholas Biosci, a former Department of Justice official, who criticizes the charges as a "perversion of justice" and a "mockery of justice." The podcast then explores the differences between state and federal courts, highlighting how state-level courts have fewer rules and a lower threshold for crimes, making it easier for state prosecutors to target individuals for political reasons. The hosts argue that the media is actively trying to portray Trump as a criminal to influence the upcoming election and discuss the suppression of information, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story, as a form of election interference. The podcast addresses the question of whether the judicial system can be fixed, acknowledging flaws in the system but believing that the best way to address them is through public awareness and pressure. They emphasize the importance of speaking out against prosecutorial misconduct and shining a light on the motives behind politically motivated charges. The podcast discusses the strategy of fighting back against the left's "dirty tactics," arguing that while they don't believe in fighting fire with fire in terms of compromising values, they do believe in matching the intensity of the left's attacks. They emphasize the importance of being truthful and not holding back when the left is being dishonest. The podcast explores the left's strategy of promoting trust in institutions, arguing that the left is using this strategy to silence dissent and maintain control. They believe that the public needs to be aware of the motives behind this strategy and to hold institutions accountable for their actions. The podcast discusses the pervasive influence of liberal ideology in American society, arguing that the media, entertainment industry, and other institutions are actively promoting liberal values, making it difficult for people to form their own opinions. They believe that it is important to actively seek out information and to challenge the narratives presented by these institutions. The podcast emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and independent research, encouraging listeners to question the narratives presented by the media and to trust their instincts when something seems suspicious. They believe that mug club provides a platform for people to share information and to engage in critical analysis. The podcast promotes the upcoming election live stream on Rumble, highlighting the importance of having a platform for independent reporting and analysis, particularly during an election. They plan to have investigative journalists, analysts, and a real-time electoral integrity map to provide viewers with accurate and unbiased information.

Outlines

00:00:00
Supervirtual Justice and the Case Against Trump

The podcast discusses the charges against Donald Trump, particularly those brought by Alvin Bragg in New York County. The episode features an interview with Nicholas Biosci, a former Department of Justice official, who criticizes the charges as a "perversion of justice" and a "mockery of justice."

00:01:12
The State Level: A Wild West of Justice

The podcast delves into the differences between state and federal courts, highlighting how state-level courts have fewer rules and a lower threshold for crimes. Biosci argues that this makes it easier for state prosecutors to target individuals for political reasons.

00:01:42
The Media's Role in the "Stealing of a Nation"

The podcast explores the media's role in shaping public opinion about Trump. The hosts argue that the media is actively trying to portray Trump as a criminal to influence the upcoming election. They also discuss the suppression of information, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story, as a form of election interference.

00:27:34
Can the Judicial System Be Fixed?

The podcast addresses the question of whether the judicial system can be fixed. The hosts acknowledge flaws in the system but believe that the best way to address them is through public awareness and pressure. They emphasize the importance of speaking out against prosecutorial misconduct and shining a light on the motives behind politically motivated charges.

00:34:00
Fighting Fire with Fire: The Importance of Intensity

The podcast discusses the strategy of fighting back against the left's "dirty tactics." The hosts argue that while they don't believe in fighting fire with fire in terms of compromising values, they do believe in matching the intensity of the left's attacks. They emphasize the importance of being truthful and not holding back when the left is being dishonest.

00:37:07
The Consequences of Institutional Trust

The podcast explores the left's strategy of promoting trust in institutions. The hosts argue that the left is using this strategy to silence dissent and maintain control. They believe that the public needs to be aware of the motives behind this strategy and to hold institutions accountable for their actions.

00:39:04
The Default Position of Liberalism and Beyond

The podcast discusses the pervasive influence of liberal ideology in American society, the importance of critical thinking and independent research, and the upcoming election live stream on Rumble. The hosts argue that the media, entertainment industry, and other institutions are actively promoting liberal values, making it difficult for people to form their own opinions. They believe that it is important to actively seek out information and to challenge the narratives presented by these institutions. They encourage listeners to question the narratives presented by the media and to trust their instincts when something seems suspicious. They believe that mug club provides a platform for people to share information and to engage in critical analysis. They highlight the importance of having a platform for independent reporting and analysis, particularly during an election. They plan to have investigative journalists, analysts, and a real-time electoral integrity map to provide viewers with accurate and unbiased information.

Keywords

Supervirtual Justice


A term used to describe the perceived manipulation of the legal system for political gain, often involving the use of fabricated charges or the selective application of the law.

Law Fair


A term used to describe the unfair and politically motivated application of the law, often targeting individuals for their political beliefs or affiliations.

Election Interference


Actions taken to influence the outcome of an election, including the suppression of information, the spread of misinformation, or the manipulation of voting systems.

Prosecutorial Misconduct


Actions taken by prosecutors that violate ethical standards or legal procedures, such as bringing charges in bad faith or using their power for personal gain.

Institutional Trust


The belief that institutions, such as the media, government, or educational systems, are acting in the best interests of the public and are trustworthy.

Default Position of Liberalism


The tendency for individuals to adopt liberal values and beliefs by default due to the pervasive influence of liberal ideology in American society.

Critical Thinking


The ability to analyze information objectively, identify biases, and form independent judgments.

Independent Research


The process of gathering information from multiple sources and evaluating its credibility to form an informed opinion.

Q&A

  • What are the main criticisms of the charges against Donald Trump?

    The charges are criticized as a "perversion of justice" and a "mockery of justice" because they are seen as politically motivated and lacking in merit.

  • How do state and federal courts differ in their handling of cases?

    State courts have fewer rules and a lower threshold for crimes, making it easier for prosecutors to target individuals for political reasons.

  • What role does the media play in shaping public opinion about Trump?

    The media is actively trying to portray Trump as a criminal to influence the upcoming election. They are also accused of suppressing information that could be damaging to the Democratic Party.

  • Can the judicial system be fixed?

    The hosts believe that the best way to address flaws in the system is through public awareness and pressure. They encourage people to speak out against prosecutorial misconduct and to shine a light on the motives behind politically motivated charges.

  • How should people respond to the left's "dirty tactics"?

    The hosts believe that it is important to match the intensity of the left's attacks while remaining truthful and upholding one's values. They argue that silence is not an option and that people need to actively fight back against dishonesty and manipulation.

  • What is the left's strategy of promoting trust in institutions?

    The left is using this strategy to silence dissent and maintain control. They are trying to convince the public that anyone who criticizes institutions is a threat to democracy.

  • How can people challenge the pervasive influence of liberal ideology?

    It is important to actively seek out information and to challenge the narratives presented by the media, entertainment industry, and other institutions. People should not simply accept the default position of liberalism.

  • Why is it important to trust your gut and do your own research?

    The hosts believe that it is important to question the narratives presented by the media and to trust your instincts when something seems suspicious. They encourage people to do their own research and to be critical of information sources.

Show Notes

Join Mug Club TODAY for $20 off with promo code LAWFARE: https://mugclub.rumble.com/support/promo/LAWFARE

DOJ Chief of Public Affairs Admits Trump Indictments are a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’; Reveals Lawfare Involved in Making Former President a ‘Convicted Felon’ Backfired on Democrats; Claims His Former Colleague Alvin Bragg’s Case is ‘Nonsense’ and Alleges He Was ‘Stacking Charges’

Send us a tip: LWCTips@ProtonMail.com

Comments 
In Channel
loading

Table of contents

00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

DOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’

DOJ Chief Admits Trump Indictments a Politically Motivated ‘Perversion of Justice’