Dismantling the China Excuse: Eight Powerful Responses to "But What About China?" in Climate Conversations
Description
In this passionate and fact-packed solo episode of Straight Talking Sustainability, host Emma Burlow tackles one of the most common conversation stoppers in climate action discussions: "There's no point in us doing anything because we're only 2% of global emissions. What about China?" This excuse appears everywhere, from boardrooms to living rooms, and Emma has had enough of watching it derail progress.
Drawing on historical data, trade realities, and competitive intelligence, Emma delivers eight comprehensive counter-arguments that sustainability professionals can keep in their back pockets for when this excuse inevitably surfaces. Rather than getting angry or defensive, she provides fact-based responses that acknowledge complexity while refusing to accept inaction.
The episode starts with historical accountability, reminding listeners that the UK led the Industrial Revolution and was the world's largest coal producer in 1922. Climate change is a legacy issue; the warming we experience today stems from emissions released in the early 1900s. Carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for up to 100 years, meaning cumulative emissions from the UK, EU, and US created the foundation of our current crisis.
Emma then addresses the trade reality that many overlook: a huge chunk of China's emissions come from manufacturing products consumed in the West. Our phones, furniture, and building materials embed Chinese carbon in our shopping baskets. You cannot complain about China's emissions while simultaneously buying the products that create them.
The conversation shifts to competitiveness, where Emma reveals an uncomfortable truth: while the UK debates and makes excuses, China is dominating the clean tech race in solar panels, electric vehicles, and battery storage. They have reached peak coal and are already transitioning. The question becomes whether the UK wants to lead this industrial revolution or be left behind buying technology from others.
Through the lens of the Paris Agreement, Emma demonstrates mathematical reality: over 160 of the 195 signatory countries emit less than 2% of global CO2. If they all used the "we're too small to matter" excuse, there would be no point to international climate agreements. Every fraction of a percent adds up, which is precisely why collective action matters.
Emma encourages listeners to choose arguments based on their audience. For innovative and ambitious business leaders, lean into the leadership and competitiveness angles. For those concerned about national interests, emphasise energy security and domestic benefits like cleaner air, warmer homes, and reduced reliance on imported gas. For values-driven conversations, acknowledge the moral responsibility to vulnerable nations that are already experiencing severe climate impacts.
The episode serves as an essential toolkit for sustainability professionals tired of watching productive conversations get derailed by deflection to China. Emma provides the facts, the framing, and the confidence to keep climate action discussions moving forward rather than grinding to a halt.
In this climate action and business competitiveness episode, you'll discover:
- Why the UK's historical role as the world's largest coal producer (1922) creates climate accountability today
- How trade emissions embed Chinese carbon footprints in Western consumption patterns
- The competitive advantage China is building through renewable energy and clean tech dominance
- Why over 160 Paris Agreement countries emit less than 2% of global emissions each
- How the "we're too small" excuse would mathematically destroy international climate cooperation
- The domestic benefits of climate action including energy security and reduced import dependence
- Strategic framing techniques for different audiences (leadership vs. innovation vs. values)
- Why China has already reached peak coal and is transitioning faster than headlines suggest
Key Climate Action and Competitiveness Insights:
(04:00 ) Historical responsibility: "The UK, the EU and the US are responsible for the majority of the cumulative emissions since the Industrial Revolution... In 1922, according to the book, the fabulous book, Black Gold, by Jeremy Paxman... the UK led on coal exploitation, coal burning and coal export... we were the biggest producer of coal in the world in the 1920s."
(05:00 ) The trade reality: "Where do you think all our stuff comes from? Right. So whose emissions really are they? A huge chunk of China's emissions come from making products that we consume in the West. Phones, furniture, building materials, you name it."
(07:50 ) Competitive disadvantage: "While we sit on our hands and make excuses and listen frankly to the wrong people, China is kicking the door down when it comes to renewables... they are leading the clean tech race from solar panels, EVs, battery storage."
(09:40 ) Leadership legacy: "COP26 in Glasgow, Boris stood up and said, we are going to lead the world on this... we were one of the first to make our net zero commitments legally binding... A Britain, a UK that suddenly says, no, we don't want to lead anymore. We're happy to follow everyone else... I don't get that feeling from the United Kingdom."
(11:00 ) Domestic benefits: "Even if China did nothing and they carried on doing what they're doing, right, it would help us to act on this, to become more energy resilient and have better energy security. That is really obvious to me."
(14:00 ) The Paris Agreement mathematics: "If we take the 195 countries who are signed up to the Paris Agreement... Over 160 of those countries emit less than 2% of global carbon emissions... If they all said, there's no point in us doing anything, that there'd literally be no point to the Paris Agreement."
Connect with Emma
Book an enquiry call with Emma
United States
