The idea of 'freewill' is quite interesting. It suggests something is not free against which 'freewill' makes sense. Where are our resources invested or 'held' up that freewill needs to be available to make choices good enough to earn grace? or is it a matter of liquidating the invested 'will' to make better choices/investments, so returns are good, healthy (not disease-ridden or coded for potential disease), graceful and would make the creator proud for having created or supported a creation in achieving outcomes worthy of such or better investment?Isn't that what venture capitalists, investors, sponsors, mentors, facilitators are supposed to do, so society has stars children would grow up emulating and becoming CitizensOfEarth (without giving family or society members fear of being gunned down, excluded with their rise to power/fame/wealth or have superiority complex reflecting inferiority complex from an imbalance in karma account keeping). A balanced karma maintainer would have 'with' the people in their democratic onion/conscience-based spheres of influence where 'of the people, for the people, by the people' are the traditional norms and needs to reflect off 'of life, by life, for life, with life.' Ishvarapranidana doesn't touch ground and maintain common ground zero (aam..or mango) if not for this grounded, centered, moolaadhaara.#thehumanrehabilitationprogram #thehumanebodyproject #humanityacrossboundaries #intangibleworldheritage