DiscoverLegal Issues In PolicingE68| Case law classics. A residence, a ruse, a reaction & reasonable grounds for arrest.
E68| Case law classics. A residence, a ruse, a reaction & reasonable grounds for arrest.

E68| Case law classics. A residence, a ruse, a reaction & reasonable grounds for arrest.

Update: 2024-06-17
Share

Description

Provide your feedback here. Send me a Text Message.

In this episode, Mike discusses the BC Court of Appeal decision R. v. Vu, [1998] Docket: CA023384 (BCCA) where police suspected a man of dealing in illegal weapons but thought they did not have enough grounds for a warrant to search his house. Police then placed a phone call to the man telling him they had a search warrant and were on their way to his house. Police watched the man as he exited his house with a garbage bag, put it in his truck and drove way. He was subsequently arrested and his truck was searched, revealing illegal weapons, drugs, and jewelry. Could the police use the man’s response to the phone call as part of their reasonable grounds for arrest? Was the search of the truck lawful? 

Here's Vu's sentence appeal if you're interested.

Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

E68| Case law classics. A residence, a ruse, a reaction & reasonable grounds for arrest.

E68| Case law classics. A residence, a ruse, a reaction & reasonable grounds for arrest.