DiscoverLegal Issues In PolicingE80| Case law classics. Running + recognition + reaction = fanny pack firearm.
E80| Case law classics. Running + recognition + reaction = fanny pack firearm.

E80| Case law classics. Running + recognition + reaction = fanny pack firearm.

Update: 2024-09-26
Share

Description

Provide your feedback here. Send me a Text Message.

In this episode, Mike discusses the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision R. v. McKenzie, 2022 MBCA 3 where a man was seen running while clenching the left side of his body with his elbow. When the officer called out to the man, the officer recognized him as a gang member. The man reacted by picking up his pace, leading the officer to suspect the man might have a weapon concealed between his left arm and his body. After a short foot pursuit, the officer pinned the man against a house and opened his fanny pack, seeing a handgun — which turned out to be loaded and stolen. Drugs and cash were also found in the man's jacket. Was the man's initial detention for a weapon's offence lawful? Was opening the fanny pack — even before patting it down — reasonable? And what if the officer had more than one reason for the search — to look for drugs or a weapon? Would a dual purpose render what the officer did in this case unreasonable?

Trial court ruling 

Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at legalissuesinpolicing@gmail.com

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

E80| Case law classics. Running + recognition + reaction = fanny pack firearm.

E80| Case law classics. Running + recognition + reaction = fanny pack firearm.