Discover政哲茶記 The Political Philosophy Cha Chaan TengEP. 2|政治哲學太離地?|現實主義與「Utopophobia」|淺談政治哲學與「現實」的關係
EP. 2|政治哲學太離地?|現實主義與「Utopophobia」|淺談政治哲學與「現實」的關係

EP. 2|政治哲學太離地?|現實主義與「Utopophobia」|淺談政治哲學與「現實」的關係

Update: 2025-06-19
Share

Description

承接上一集嘅總論,今集講一個政治哲學的方法論(methodology)問題:究竟政治哲學應唔應該「離地」?政治哲學應該點樣處理「政治現實」嘅問題?一個「冇可能」實現嘅理論,究竟又有冇價值?

This episode explores a methodological question in political philosophy, namely: how "idealistic" or "realistic" should political theory be? My discussion will be focused on the works of Bernard Williams and David Estlund.

參考書目 References:

Estlund, David. Utopophobia: On the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 2020.

Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press, 2005.

(Edits: Post-publication refinement.)

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

EP. 2|政治哲學太離地?|現實主義與「Utopophobia」|淺談政治哲學與「現實」的關係

EP. 2|政治哲學太離地?|現實主義與「Utopophobia」|淺談政治哲學與「現實」的關係

Douglas Choi