DiscoverClauses & ControversiesEp 149 - Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?
Ep 149 - Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?

Ep 149 - Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?

Update: 2025-01-19
Share

Description

Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?

Two of our favorite things to talk about are innovative contract clauses and ancient illogical contract doctrines that unexpectedly bite in the ass. A few weeks ago, we walked through the Loss Reinstatement provisions for Ghana and Zambia. We asked the question of whether those provisions might run afoul of the antiquated and bizarre (to us) anti-penalty doctrines under English and New York law. English law having recently become more permissive with regards to permitting penalty type clauses – if they have a legitimate business purpose -- we speculated about whether the Zambia/Ghana clauses might pass muster. Maybe. But Sri Lanka’s version of the clauses is under New York law. And New York law on this matter is still stuck in the dark ages, best we can tell. So, does the Loss Reinstatement provision for Sri Lanka run afoul of the penalty doctrine?

Producer: Leanna Doty
Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Ep 149 - Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?

Ep 149 - Is Sri Lanka’s Loss Reinstatement Provision a Penalty?

Mitu Gulati & Mark Weidemaier