Episode 3: Malmedy
25Digest
This episode of "Rachel Maddow Presents Ultra" delves into the Malmedy massacre, a horrific event during World War II where Nazi SS troops executed unarmed American prisoners of war. The episode details the trial of the perpetrators, highlighting the shocking confessions and the efforts of the defense lawyer, Willis Everett, to cast doubt on the proceedings. However, the episode reveals Everett's deep-seated anti-Semitism and his attempts to exploit the case for personal gain. The episode also explores the role of Rudolph Aschenauer, a former Nazi lawyer who represented many war criminals and was deeply involved in efforts to revive the Nazi movement in post-war Germany. Aschenauer, along with Everett, used the Malmedy case to spread false accusations of torture and abuse, aiming to discredit the war crimes trials and undermine American justice. The episode concludes by highlighting the dangerous consequences of these efforts, which ultimately contributed to the rise of anti-democratic forces in the United States.
Outlines
Introduction
This Chapter introduces the episode's topic: the Malmedy massacre and its aftermath. It sets the stage for the investigation into the massacre and the subsequent trial of the perpetrators.
The Malmedy Massacre
This Chapter recounts the events of the Malmedy massacre, where Nazi SS troops executed unarmed American prisoners of war. It describes the brutality of the massacre and the immediate aftermath, including the discovery of the frozen bodies of the victims.
The Trial of the Perpetrators
This Chapter focuses on the trial of the Nazi SS soldiers accused of the Malmedy massacre. It details the evidence presented, including confessions from the defendants, and the challenges faced by the defense lawyer, Willis Everett.
Willis Everett's Anti-Semitism
This Chapter reveals the deep-seated anti-Semitism of Willis Everett, the defense lawyer in the Malmedy trial. It details his private correspondence and his belief that the investigation and trial were driven by Jewish interests.
The False Accusations
This Chapter explores Everett's efforts to discredit the Malmedy trial by spreading false accusations of torture and abuse against the defendants. It details his petition to the US Army and the subsequent investigations that debunked his claims.
The Nazi Response
This Chapter examines the response of convicted Nazi soldiers and the Nazi movement in Germany to Everett's accusations. It highlights the role of Rudolph Aschenauer, a former Nazi lawyer, in exploiting the case to undermine American justice and revive Nazi ideology.
The Political Weapon
This Chapter explores how the Malmedy case became a political weapon for both Everett and Aschenauer. It details their efforts to manipulate public opinion and pressure the US Army to retry the case, ultimately contributing to the rise of anti-democratic forces in the United States.
Keywords
Malmedy massacre
The Malmedy massacre was a horrific event that occurred on December 17, 1944, during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II. Nazi SS troops executed unarmed American prisoners of war in the Belgian town of Malmedy. The massacre was characterized by extreme brutality, with the victims being shot, stabbed, and beaten. The event shocked the American public and became a symbol of Nazi atrocities.
Willis Everett
Willis Everett was an American Army colonel who served as the defense lawyer in the Malmedy massacre trial. He was a deeply prejudiced man with strong anti-Semitic views. After the trial, Everett spread false accusations of torture and abuse against the defendants, attempting to discredit the proceedings and undermine American justice. His actions were motivated by a desire for personal gain and a belief that the Jews were behind the prosecution of the Nazi war criminals.
Rudolph Aschenauer
Rudolph Aschenauer was a German lawyer and former Nazi who represented many Nazi war criminals after World War II. He was deeply committed to defending Nazi ideology and was involved in various efforts to revive the Nazi movement in post-war Germany. Aschenauer used the Malmedy case to spread false accusations of torture and abuse, aiming to discredit the war crimes trials and undermine American justice. He saw these trials as a tool of punishment imposed by the Allies on Germany and believed that the Nazis were victims of a Jewish conspiracy.
Battle of the Bulge
The Battle of the Bulge was a major German offensive launched in December 1944 during World War II. It was the last major German offensive of the war and was aimed at breaking through Allied lines in the Ardennes region of Belgium. The battle was characterized by heavy fighting and significant casualties on both sides. The Malmedy massacre occurred during the Battle of the Bulge.
Nazi war crimes
Nazi war crimes refer to the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime during World War II. These crimes included genocide, mass murder, torture, and other violations of human rights. The Nuremberg Trials, held after the war, were established to prosecute Nazi leaders for their crimes. The Malmedy massacre was one of many Nazi war crimes that were investigated and prosecuted after the war.
American prisoners of war
American prisoners of war (POWs) were American soldiers who were captured by enemy forces during World War II. The Malmedy massacre involved the execution of American POWs by Nazi SS troops. The treatment of POWs during the war was a major issue, with many POWs being subjected to harsh conditions and abuse. The Malmedy massacre highlighted the brutality of the Nazi regime towards American POWs.
anti-Semitism
Anti-Semitism is prejudice, discrimination, or hostility directed at Jews. It is a form of racism that has been prevalent throughout history. Willis Everett, the defense lawyer in the Malmedy trial, was a deeply anti-Semitic man. His anti-Semitism motivated his efforts to discredit the trial and undermine American justice. Anti-Semitism played a significant role in the rise of Nazism and the Holocaust.
Nazi propaganda
Nazi propaganda was a powerful tool used by the Nazi regime to spread its ideology and control public opinion. It was characterized by its use of fear, hatred, and scapegoating. Nazi propaganda was used to demonize Jews, promote racial purity, and justify the Nazi regime's actions. The Malmedy massacre was used by Nazi propagandists to portray the Allies as brutal and vindictive.
post-war Germany
Post-war Germany refers to the period after World War II, when Germany was occupied by Allied forces. The period was marked by significant political and social changes, including the prosecution of Nazi war criminals and the rebuilding of German society. The Malmedy massacre trial and its aftermath had a significant impact on post-war Germany, contributing to the rise of anti-democratic forces and the resurgence of Nazi ideology.
Q&A
What was the Malmedy massacre?
The Malmedy massacre was a horrific event that occurred on December 17, 1944, during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II. Nazi SS troops executed unarmed American prisoners of war in the Belgian town of Malmedy. The massacre was characterized by extreme brutality, with the victims being shot, stabbed, and beaten.
Who was Willis Everett and what role did he play in the Malmedy case?
Willis Everett was an American Army colonel who served as the defense lawyer in the Malmedy massacre trial. He was a deeply prejudiced man with strong anti-Semitic views. After the trial, Everett spread false accusations of torture and abuse against the defendants, attempting to discredit the proceedings and undermine American justice. His actions were motivated by a desire for personal gain and a belief that the Jews were behind the prosecution of the Nazi war criminals.
What was Rudolph Aschenauer's role in the Malmedy case and in post-war Germany?
Rudolph Aschenauer was a German lawyer and former Nazi who represented many Nazi war criminals after World War II. He was deeply committed to defending Nazi ideology and was involved in various efforts to revive the Nazi movement in post-war Germany. Aschenauer used the Malmedy case to spread false accusations of torture and abuse, aiming to discredit the war crimes trials and undermine American justice. He saw these trials as a tool of punishment imposed by the Allies on Germany and believed that the Nazis were victims of a Jewish conspiracy.
How did the Malmedy case become a political weapon?
Both Willis Everett and Rudolph Aschenauer used the Malmedy case to manipulate public opinion and pressure the US Army to retry the case. They spread false accusations of torture and abuse, aiming to discredit the war crimes trials and undermine American justice. Their efforts ultimately contributed to the rise of anti-democratic forces in the United States.
What were the consequences of the false accusations made in the Malmedy case?
The false accusations made in the Malmedy case had a significant impact on post-war Germany and the United States. They contributed to the rise of anti-democratic forces in both countries and helped to revive Nazi ideology in Germany. The case also highlighted the dangers of anti-Semitism and the importance of upholding justice and truth.
Show Notes
One of the most shocking incidents of World War II for Americans -- a cold-blooded Nazi massacre of surrendering American troops -- gets weaponized against the United States by surviving Nazis hoping to return to power, as well as a group of Americans sympathetic to their cause. A gruesome hoax around the massacre, cooked up by the Nazis, will soon rocket through American politics.
Table of contents
United States
