DiscoverIn the Privy CouncilFinzi v Jamaican Redev’t Fdn Inc [2023] UKPC 29, Jam
Finzi v Jamaican Redev’t Fdn Inc [2023] UKPC 29, Jam

Finzi v Jamaican Redev’t Fdn Inc [2023] UKPC 29, Jam

Update: 2023-09-13
Share

Description

In this episode, we consider how courts should decide when allegations of fraud made (considerably) after judgment are sufficient to re-open the cases. Plus, Lord Leggatt teaches how to read a judgment!




Link to case: [2023] UKPC 29, Jam


Legal Style Blog homepage


Twitter: @legalstyleblog


E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk


Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations

Comments 
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Finzi v Jamaican Redev’t Fdn Inc [2023] UKPC 29, Jam

Finzi v Jamaican Redev’t Fdn Inc [2023] UKPC 29, Jam

Elijah Granet