DiscoverStrict ScrutinyFlags, Feuds, and Roberts' Rebuff
Flags, Feuds, and Roberts' Rebuff

Flags, Feuds, and Roberts' Rebuff

Update: 2024-06-0310
Share

Digest

This episode of Strict Scrutiny begins with a discussion of the Supreme Court's recent opinions, including Contero v. Bank of America, a unanimous decision that vacated a Second Circuit ruling on the preemption of state escrow interest laws by federal banking laws. The episode then covers NRA v. Fulow, a unanimous decision finding that New York State officials unconstitutionally coerced companies into severing business ties with the NRA due to its political positions. The episode also discusses Thornal v. Jones, a 6-3 decision written by Justice Alito that reversed a Ninth Circuit ruling on a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, with Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson filing dissenting opinions. The episode then delves into the ongoing saga of Justice Alito's wife, Martha Ann, and her flag-flying antics, which have been the subject of recent reporting by Jody Cantor. The episode discusses the sequence of events leading up to Martha Ann's decision to fly an upside-down American flag outside their home, including a dispute with their neighbors over anti-Trump signs and a reported incident where Martha Ann allegedly spit on their car. The episode also discusses Justice Alito's response to the controversy, in which he blamed his wife for the flag-flying and defended her right to do so. The episode concludes with a discussion of the implications of these events for the Supreme Court's ethics and the ongoing debate over the court's accountability.

Outlines

00:00:00
Supreme Court Opinions

This Chapter discusses the Supreme Court's recent opinions, including Contero v. Bank of America, NRA v. Fulow, and Thornal v. Jones. Contero v. Bank of America was a unanimous decision that vacated a Second Circuit ruling on the preemption of state escrow interest laws by federal banking laws. NRA v. Fulow was a unanimous decision finding that New York State officials unconstitutionally coerced companies into severing business ties with the NRA due to its political positions. Thornal v. Jones was a 6-3 decision written by Justice Alito that reversed a Ninth Circuit ruling on a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, with Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson filing dissenting opinions.

00:24:43
Court Culture: The Real Housewives of Fairfax County

This Chapter discusses the ongoing saga of Justice Alito's wife, Martha Ann, and her flag-flying antics, which have been the subject of recent reporting by Jody Cantor. The episode discusses the sequence of events leading up to Martha Ann's decision to fly an upside-down American flag outside their home, including a dispute with their neighbors over anti-Trump signs and a reported incident where Martha Ann allegedly spit on their car. The episode also discusses Justice Alito's response to the controversy, in which he blamed his wife for the flag-flying and defended her right to do so.

01:06:54
Podcast Doomscrolling: The Season of Bad Decisions

This Chapter discusses the implications of these events for the Supreme Court's ethics and the ongoing debate over the court's accountability. The episode also discusses the upcoming decisions that the court is expected to issue in the coming weeks, including cases on Trump immunity, prosecutions for J6ers, abortion, gun control, social media regulation, and more. The episode concludes with the announcement of the official Strict Scrutiny summer cocktail, the Martha Rita.

Keywords

Contero v. Bank of America


A case decided by the Supreme Court in 2024 that involved a nuanced federal preemption question. The question presented was whether the National Bank Act preempted the application of state escrow interest laws to national banks. The Court ruled unanimously in favor of the petitioners, holding that the Second Circuit had not conducted the kind of nuanced comparative analysis required by the Dodd-Frank Act and Barnett Bank.

NRA v. Fulow


A case decided by the Supreme Court in 2024 that involved the question of whether New York State officials unconstitutionally coerced companies into severing business ties with the NRA because of the NRA's political positions. The Court ruled unanimously in favor of the NRA, finding that the NRA had alleged a constitutional violation and also a clearly established one.

Thornal v. Jones


A case decided by the Supreme Court in 2024 that involved a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim brought by a criminal defendant. The Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the state, holding that the Ninth Circuit had erred in applying the Strickland standard. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson filed dissenting opinions.

Martha Ann Alito


The wife of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. She has been the subject of recent reporting by Jody Cantor for her flag-flying antics, which have included flying an upside-down American flag and a "manga" flag outside their home. Justice Alito has defended his wife's actions, arguing that she has a right to privacy and freedom of expression.

Jody Cantor


A journalist who has been covering the Supreme Court for The New York Times. She has written a number of articles about Martha Ann Alito's flag-flying antics, which have sparked controversy and debate.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization


A landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 2022 that overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. The Dobbs decision has had a significant impact on abortion access in the United States, with many states enacting laws restricting or banning abortion.

Strict Scrutiny


A podcast hosted by Leah Litman, Melissa Murray, and Kate Shaw that covers the Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it. The podcast is known for its insightful analysis of the Court's decisions and its witty and engaging commentary.

Supreme Court Ethics


A topic of ongoing debate and controversy. The Supreme Court has been criticized for its lack of transparency and accountability, particularly in relation to the justices' financial dealings and their spouses' activities. The recent controversy over Martha Ann Alito's flag-flying has raised further questions about the Court's ethics.

Q&A

  • What were the key takeaways from the Supreme Court's recent opinions discussed in this episode?

    The Court issued a unanimous decision in Contero v. Bank of America, finding that the Second Circuit had erred in its preemption analysis. In NRA v. Fulow, the Court also ruled unanimously, finding that New York State officials had unconstitutionally coerced companies into severing ties with the NRA. However, the Court's 6-3 decision in Thornal v. Jones, written by Justice Alito, reversed a Ninth Circuit ruling on a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, with Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson filing dissenting opinions.

  • What is the ongoing saga surrounding Justice Alito's wife, Martha Ann?

    Martha Ann Alito has been the subject of recent reporting by Jody Cantor for her flag-flying antics, which have included flying an upside-down American flag and a "manga" flag outside their home. These actions have sparked controversy and debate, with some questioning whether they raise ethical concerns for Justice Alito. Justice Alito has defended his wife's actions, arguing that she has a right to privacy and freedom of expression.

  • What are the implications of these events for the Supreme Court's ethics and accountability?

    The controversy over Martha Ann Alito's flag-flying has raised further questions about the Supreme Court's ethics and accountability. Some have argued that the justices should be subject to stricter ethical rules, while others have defended the Court's independence. The debate over the Court's ethics is likely to continue in the coming months, particularly as the Court faces a number of high-profile decisions on issues such as abortion, gun control, and social media regulation.

  • What are some of the key decisions that the Supreme Court is expected to issue in the coming weeks?

    The Court is expected to issue a number of high-profile decisions in the coming weeks, including cases on Trump immunity, prosecutions for J6ers, abortion, gun control, social media regulation, and more. These decisions are likely to have a significant impact on American society and politics.

Show Notes

Melissa and Kate recap the Supreme Court's latest opinions and catch up on the latest drama from the Alitos' flag-flying fiasco.

We’re giving one lucky listener the chance to win a pair of tickets to our SOLD OUT show in DC on June 22nd.Here’s how to enter:

  1. Subscribe to Strict Scrutiny’s Youtube channel
  2. Leave a COMMENT on our most recent video episode with YOUR favorite Strict Scrutiny moment. [LINK MONDAY’S YT VIDEO HERE]

The giveaway starts TODAY and ends June 7th at 11:59 pm PT. We’ll be picking a winner on/around June 10th so be sure to keep an eye on your comment. For the full rules, check out the link here: http://crooked.com/strictgiveawaydc


Comments (1)

Pamela Deering

I am stricken anew with all of your skills as hosts and podcast personalities. You seem like such wonderful people to be around and converse with. Your comments are succinct, germane and witty. Thank you for making my Monday evenings so erudite and fun.

Jun 4th
Reply
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Flags, Feuds, and Roberts' Rebuff

Flags, Feuds, and Roberts' Rebuff

melissa murray, kate shaw