How To Read Polls In 2024
1Digest
This podcast episode delves into the fundamentals of polling, offering 10 essential tips for reading polls responsibly during the 2024 presidential campaign. The episode features an interview with senior elections analyst Nathaniel Raekich, who provides insights on evaluating pollsters, understanding partisan bias, interpreting likely voter models, and navigating the complexities of margin of error. The episode explains the concept of margin of error in a simplified way, comparing it to taking a sample of the population to represent the whole. It emphasizes that margin of error only accounts for sampling error and not other sources of error, such as non-response bias or temporal changes. The episode highlights the importance of comparing polls only if they were conducted by the same pollster, as different pollsters can have "house effects" that make their results consistently more or less favorable to one party. It emphasizes that comparing polls from different pollsters can lead to misleading conclusions. The episode acknowledges that polls are generally accurate but not perfect, emphasizing that they are snapshots of public opinion at a specific moment in time. It discusses the limitations of polls in predicting election outcomes, particularly in close races, and highlights the importance of considering the margin of error and other sources of error. The episode cautions against trying to "un-skew" polls by adjusting the sample size or composition to reflect perceived biases. It emphasizes that pollsters are professionals who strive for accuracy and have already weighted their polls to be representative. It also highlights the limitations of adjusting polls based on historical error patterns, as the direction of error can vary unpredictably from election to election. The episode emphasizes that polls are snapshots of public opinion at a specific moment in time and should not be treated as predictions of election outcomes. It discusses the importance of considering the timing of polls and how their predictive power increases as the election approaches. It also highlights the role of primary elections in shaping the accuracy of polls as the campaign progresses.
Outlines
Reading Polls Responsibly: 10 Tips for Navigating the 2024 Election
This podcast episode delves into the fundamentals of polling, providing 10 essential tips for reading polls responsibly during the 2024 presidential campaign. The episode features an interview with senior elections analyst Nathaniel Raekich, who offers insights on evaluating pollsters, understanding partisan bias, interpreting likely voter models, and navigating the complexities of margin of error.
Understanding Margin of Error and Other Sources of Error
The episode explains the concept of margin of error in a simplified way, comparing it to taking a sample of the population to represent the whole. It emphasizes that margin of error only accounts for sampling error and not other sources of error, such as non-response bias or temporal changes.
Comparing Polls and House Effects
The episode highlights the importance of comparing polls only if they were conducted by the same pollster, as different pollsters can have "house effects" that make their results consistently more or less favorable to one party. It emphasizes that comparing polls from different pollsters can lead to misleading conclusions.
Polls are Accurate but Not Perfect: Limitations and Considerations
The episode acknowledges that polls are generally accurate but not perfect, emphasizing that they are snapshots of public opinion at a specific moment in time. It discusses the limitations of polls in predicting election outcomes, particularly in close races, and highlights the importance of considering the margin of error and other sources of error.
Don't Try to Unskew the Polls: Understanding Pollster Expertise
The episode cautions against trying to "un-skew" polls by adjusting the sample size or composition to reflect perceived biases. It emphasizes that pollsters are professionals who strive for accuracy and have already weighted their polls to be representative. It also highlights the limitations of adjusting polls based on historical error patterns, as the direction of error can vary unpredictably from election to election.
Polls as Snapshots, Not Predictions: Timing and Predictive Power
The episode emphasizes that polls are snapshots of public opinion at a specific moment in time and should not be treated as predictions of election outcomes. It discusses the importance of considering the timing of polls and how their predictive power increases as the election approaches. It also highlights the role of primary elections in shaping the accuracy of polls as the campaign progresses.
Keywords
Pollster Ratings
A system used to evaluate the accuracy and transparency of polling organizations. Ratings are based on historical performance, methodology, and transparency practices.
Partisan Bias
The tendency of polls conducted by partisan groups to favor their preferred candidate or party. This bias can be adjusted for in polling averages, but it's important to be aware of it when interpreting poll results.
Likely Voter Models
Statistical models used to predict the likelihood of registered voters turning out to vote in an election. These models can differ from polls of registered voters, as they account for factors like past voting history and self-reported likelihood of voting.
Margin of Error
A statistical measure of the uncertainty in a poll's results due to sampling error. It represents the range within which the true population value is likely to fall.
House Effects
Consistent differences in the results of polls conducted by the same pollster, often attributed to their methodology or the characteristics of their sample. House effects can make it difficult to compare polls from different pollsters.
Outlier Polls
Polls that produce results significantly different from the consensus of other polls. Outliers can sometimes be indicative of real shifts in the race, but they should be treated with caution and considered in the context of the overall polling average.
Unskewing Polls
The practice of adjusting poll results to account for perceived biases or errors. This is generally discouraged, as pollsters are professionals who strive for accuracy and have already weighted their polls to be representative.
Q&A
What are some key factors to consider when evaluating the quality of a pollster?
Look for pollsters with a proven track record of accuracy, transparency in their methodology, and a willingness to disclose their data and analysis.
How do partisan polls affect the overall polling average?
Partisan polls are typically adjusted for their known bias, with a certain number of points shaved off the margin depending on the party affiliation of the sponsor.
Why is it important to pay attention to the sample of voters included in a poll?
The sample should be representative of the target population, and it's important to consider whether the poll is based on registered voters or likely voters, as these groups can have different characteristics and voting patterns.
What are some common sources of error in polling besides sampling error?
Non-response bias, temporal changes in public opinion, and question wording can all contribute to error in polls.
How should we interpret outlier polls that differ significantly from the polling average?
Outlier polls should be considered in the context of the overall polling average and other factors, such as recent events or changes in the campaign. They can sometimes be indicative of real shifts in the race, but they should be treated with caution.
Why is it important to avoid trying to "un-skew" polls?
Pollsters are professionals who strive for accuracy and have already weighted their polls to be representative. Adjusting polls based on perceived biases or errors can lead to misleading conclusions.
How do polls become more predictive as the election approaches?
As the election approaches, the electorate becomes more settled, and the candidates' positions and messages become clearer. This makes it easier for pollsters to accurately capture public opinion and predict election outcomes.
Show Notes
We are in the frantic final weeks of the presidential campaign, which means Americans are obsessing over polling data more than usual. At 538, we cover this stuff year-round. So today on the show, we’re going back to the fundamentals. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a seasoned political hack or a bright-eyed newcomer: Everyone can benefit from our 10 Essentials Of Following Polls.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Table of contents
United States
