**🌍 Emotions Are Not Universal — They’re Cultural Lenses Shaping Reality**

We often think emotions are hardwired facts — but in truth, they’re deeply shaped by the culture we live in. Emotions *feel* like objective reality, but they’re more like tinted glasses that color our perception.

🧠 **Kristen Lindquist**, professor of psychology and neuroscience, explains how emotion is both *biological* and *cultural*. While our brains come with the machinery to feel, *what* we feel — and *how* we interpret those feelings — is learned through culture, like language or art.

For example:

- In the U.S., anger = drawing a boundary. In Japan, anger = disrupting harmony.

- Westerners under stress may see threats (like misidentifying objects as guns) — a bias driven by intense emotion.

- Emotions aren’t even linguistically universal: only 22% of languages have a word for “fear” like English does. "Surprise" appears in just 13%.

👀 Even facial expressions — long thought to be universal emotional signals — are perceived differently depending on your cultural lens. What looks like anger in the UK may be read as something else in China. “Resting bitch face”? A cultural misinterpretation layered on gender norms.

💬 Gender norms, too, shape how emotions are interpreted. Women’s distress may be dismissed as anxiety. Men are expected to show anger, not sadness. This misalignment leads to real-world consequences — from misdiagnosed heart attacks to internalized shame.

🌏 *Emotions, then, are predictions*, filtered through past experiences, learned behaviors, and societal values. Recognizing that others may see, feel, and react differently — not wrongly — is key to reducing bias and creating connection.

> **The takeaway?** Emotions are not truths — they are interpretations. And when we treat them as such, we become more open, less reactive, and better able to connect across divides.

Folllow this Podcast for daily Episodes

-----------------

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices