Lane v. Franks

Update: 2014-04-28

Description

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be used to terminate the employee.

Comments

In Channel

Limelight Networks v. Akamai Technologies

2014-04-3058:16

Riley v. California

2014-04-2901:01:21

Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.

2014-04-2801:00:39

Lane v. Franks

2014-04-2856:01

United States v. Clarke

2014-04-2357:08

CTS Corp. v. Waldburger

2014-04-2301:00:51

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

2014-04-2257:31

ABC, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

2014-04-2259:41

Pom Wonderful, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company

2014-04-2101:01:51

Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.

2014-04-2101:01:50

Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer

2014-04-0201:02:00

Loughrin v. United States

2014-04-0101:02:37

Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank International

2014-03-3159:56

Wood v. Moss

2014-03-2659:39

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores

2014-03-2501:28:16

Clark v. Rameker

2014-03-2457:28

Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.

2014-03-0501:01:15

Plumhoff v. Rickard

2014-03-0401:01:16

Hall v. Florida

2014-03-0359:00

Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness

2014-02-2651:48

00:00

1.0x

#box-pro-ellipsis-175955555766289{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}Lane v. Franks

Lane v. Franks

Lane v. Franks