Lost Women of Science Conversations: The Exceptions
Digest
This episode of Lost Women of Science Conversations features Nancy Hopkins, a molecular biologist who faced significant challenges throughout her career due to gender discrimination. She shares her personal story, starting with her childhood love for science and her transformative experience at Radcliffe College. Hopkins recounts the various forms of discrimination she encountered, including being sidelined by male colleagues, excluded from meetings, and having credit for her discoveries stolen. She emphasizes the cumulative impact of these experiences over years, which ultimately led her to become an activist for gender equity. Hopkins describes the turning point when she realized that she was not seen as a full participant in the scientific system she loved, and how this realization fueled her fight for change. The episode also features Kate Zernikey, a reporter who broke the story of Hopkins' fight for women in science in 1999. Zernikey discusses the importance of telling Hopkins' personal story to illustrate the insidious nature of unconscious bias and its impact on women in science. The episode concludes with a discussion of Hopkins' recent award, the National Academy of Sciences Public Welfare Medal, which recognizes her leadership in promoting gender equity in science. Hopkins reflects on the significance of the award and the importance of acknowledging the work of those who came before her in fighting for women's rights in science.
Outlines
Introduction and Nancy Hopkins' Early Life
This Chapter introduces the episode and its focus on Nancy Hopkins, a molecular biologist who faced discrimination in science. It also delves into Hopkins' early life, highlighting her childhood love for science and her transformative experience at Radcliffe College, where she was inspired by a lecture by James D. Watson, the man who discovered the structure of DNA.
Challenges Faced by Nancy Hopkins
This Chapter explores the various challenges Nancy Hopkins faced during her career in science due to gender discrimination. It highlights specific instances of discrimination, including being sidelined by male colleagues, excluded from meetings, having credit for her discoveries stolen, and being denied equal lab space. Hopkins discusses the cumulative impact of these experiences and how they ultimately led her to become an activist for gender equity.
The Turning Point and the Power of Data
This Chapter focuses on the turning point in Nancy Hopkins' journey, when she realized that she was not seen as a full participant in the scientific system she loved. It also highlights the importance of data in her fight for change. Hopkins and Kate Zernikey, a reporter who covered Hopkins' story, discuss how Hopkins and other women scientists at MIT gathered data to document the discrimination they faced, ultimately leading to a landmark report that exposed the systemic nature of the problem.
The Power of Allies and the Importance of Collective Action
This Chapter explores the role of allies in Nancy Hopkins' fight for gender equity in science. It highlights the importance of the group of women scientists at MIT who came together to support Hopkins and share their own experiences of discrimination. Hopkins emphasizes the power of collective action and the importance of finding common themes and stories that resonate with a broader audience.
The Impact of the MIT Report and the Need for Continued Action
This Chapter discusses the impact of the landmark report on gender discrimination at MIT, which was published in 1996. Hopkins and Zernikey reflect on the report's significance and its role in raising awareness about the insidious nature of unconscious bias in science. They also discuss the need for continued action to address these issues and ensure that women have fair opportunities in science.
Nancy Hopkins' Award and the Legacy of Women in Science
This Chapter celebrates Nancy Hopkins' recent award, the National Academy of Sciences Public Welfare Medal, which recognizes her leadership in promoting gender equity in science. Hopkins reflects on the significance of the award and the importance of acknowledging the work of those who came before her in fighting for women's rights in science. She also discusses the ongoing challenges and the need for continued vigilance in ensuring that women have equal opportunities in science.
Keywords
Nancy Hopkins
Nancy Hopkins is a renowned molecular biologist and a leading advocate for gender equity in science. She is known for her groundbreaking research on cancer genetics and her role in exposing systemic discrimination against women at MIT. Hopkins' work has had a profound impact on the scientific community and has inspired countless women to pursue careers in science.
Unconscious Bias
Unconscious bias refers to the automatic judgments and assumptions that people make about others based on their social group memberships, such as gender, race, or ethnicity. These biases can be subtle and unintentional, but they can have a significant impact on people's opportunities and outcomes. In the context of science, unconscious bias can lead to women being overlooked for promotions, funding, and other opportunities.
Gender Equity
Gender equity refers to the fair and just treatment of people of all genders. In the context of science, gender equity means ensuring that women have equal opportunities to pursue careers in science, conduct research, and achieve leadership positions. Achieving gender equity in science requires addressing the systemic barriers that women face, such as unconscious bias, discrimination, and lack of support.
MIT
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is a prestigious private research university located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It is known for its excellence in science, engineering, and technology. In the 1990s, MIT became the center of a major controversy when a landmark report documented widespread discrimination against female faculty members. This report, which was led by Nancy Hopkins, had a significant impact on the scientific community and helped to raise awareness about the issue of gender discrimination in science.
National Academy of Sciences
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is a prestigious organization of scientists and engineers in the United States. It was founded in 1863 by President Abraham Lincoln to advise the government on matters of science and technology. The NAS awards the Public Welfare Medal to individuals or organizations whose work has made significant contributions to the public good. Nancy Hopkins received the Public Welfare Medal in 2023 for her leadership in promoting gender equity in science.
Women in Science
Women in science refers to the participation of women in scientific fields, including research, teaching, and leadership. Despite significant progress in recent decades, women remain underrepresented in science, particularly at the highest levels. This underrepresentation is due to a variety of factors, including unconscious bias, discrimination, and lack of support. Addressing these issues is essential for ensuring that women have equal opportunities to contribute to scientific progress.
MeToo Movement
The MeToo movement is a global movement against sexual harassment and assault. It began in 2017 with the hashtag #MeToo, which encouraged people to share their experiences of sexual harassment and assault. The MeToo movement has had a significant impact on society, raising awareness about the prevalence of sexual harassment and assault and leading to calls for greater accountability for perpetrators. The movement has also inspired women to speak out about other forms of discrimination, including gender discrimination in science.
Systemic Discrimination
Systemic discrimination refers to the patterns of discrimination that are embedded in the structures and institutions of society. This type of discrimination can be difficult to identify and address because it is often subtle and unintentional. In the context of science, systemic discrimination can manifest in the form of unconscious bias, lack of mentorship, and limited opportunities for women. Addressing systemic discrimination requires a multifaceted approach that involves changing the culture of science and creating more equitable systems.
Science Communication
Science communication is the process of sharing scientific information with the public. It is an important field that helps to bridge the gap between scientists and the public. Effective science communication can help to increase public understanding of science, promote scientific literacy, and inspire the next generation of scientists. Juliana Lemure, the host of Lost Women of Science Conversations, is a scientist by training who now works in science communication.
Lost Women of Science
Lost Women of Science is a podcast that tells the stories of remarkable women scientists who have been overlooked or forgotten by history. The podcast aims to highlight the contributions of these women and to inspire future generations of scientists. The podcast is hosted by Juliana Lemure and produced by Katie Haffner.
Q&A
What were some of the challenges that Nancy Hopkins faced during her career in science?
Nancy Hopkins faced a range of challenges, including being sidelined by male colleagues, excluded from departmental meetings, having credit for her discoveries stolen, and being denied equal lab space. She also experienced subtle forms of discrimination, such as being tolerated but not welcomed or included in the scientific community.
What was the turning point for Nancy Hopkins in her fight for gender equity in science?
The turning point for Hopkins was when she realized that she was not seen as a full participant in the scientific system she loved. This realization came after years of experiencing discrimination and trying to navigate around it. It led her to question her own abilities and to finally acknowledge the systemic nature of the problem.
How did Nancy Hopkins and other women scientists at MIT gather data to document the discrimination they faced?
Hopkins and her colleagues gathered data by measuring the size of their labs and comparing them to those of their male peers. They also collected information about funding opportunities, promotions, and other aspects of their careers. This data helped to demonstrate the systemic nature of the discrimination they were experiencing.
What was the impact of the landmark report on gender discrimination at MIT?
The report, which was published in 1996, had a significant impact on the scientific community. It raised awareness about the issue of gender discrimination in science and led to calls for change at MIT and other institutions. The report also helped to validate the experiences of women scientists who had been struggling in silence.
What is the significance of Nancy Hopkins' recent award, the National Academy of Sciences Public Welfare Medal?
The award recognizes Hopkins' leadership in promoting gender equity in science. It is a testament to the impact of her work and her commitment to creating a more equitable scientific community. The award also highlights the importance of acknowledging the work of those who have fought for women's rights in science.
What is the role of unconscious bias in the underrepresentation of women in science?
Unconscious bias refers to the automatic judgments and assumptions that people make about others based on their social group memberships. These biases can be subtle and unintentional, but they can have a significant impact on people's opportunities and outcomes. In the context of science, unconscious bias can lead to women being overlooked for promotions, funding, and other opportunities.
What are some of the ways to address the issue of gender discrimination in science?
Addressing gender discrimination in science requires a multifaceted approach that involves changing the culture of science and creating more equitable systems. This includes promoting awareness of unconscious bias, providing mentorship and support for women scientists, and creating more inclusive environments. It also requires holding institutions accountable for their actions and ensuring that women have equal opportunities to succeed.
What is the importance of science communication in promoting gender equity in science?
Science communication is essential for raising awareness about the issue of gender discrimination in science and for inspiring the next generation of scientists. By sharing the stories of women scientists who have faced challenges and overcome obstacles, science communicators can help to create a more inclusive and equitable scientific community.
What is the legacy of Nancy Hopkins' fight for gender equity in science?
Nancy Hopkins' fight for gender equity in science has had a profound impact on the scientific community. Her work has helped to raise awareness about the issue of discrimination, to inspire women to speak out about their experiences, and to create a more inclusive and equitable environment for women in science. Her legacy will continue to inspire future generations of scientists to fight for equality and justice.
What is the message that Nancy Hopkins and Kate Zernikey want to convey through their book, "The Exceptions"?
The book aims to educate readers about the insidious nature of unconscious bias and its impact on women in science. It highlights the importance of recognizing and addressing these biases to create a more equitable and inclusive scientific community.
Show Notes
Dr. Nancy Hopkins, a molecular biologist who made major discoveries in cancer genetics, became an unlikely activist in her early fifties. She had always believed that if you did great science, you would get the recognition you deserved. But after years of humiliations — being snubbed for promotions and realizing the women's labs were smaller than those of their male counterparts — she finally woke up to the fact that her beloved MIT did not value women scientists. So measuring tape in hand, she collected the data to prove her point. In The Exceptions: Nancy Hopkins, MIT, and the Fight for Women in Science, Kate Zernike tells Nancy's story, which led to MIT’s historic admission of discrimination against its female scientists in 1999. Host Julianna LeMieux talks with Kate and Nancy about the journey.
Table of contents
United States
