Lost Women of Science Conversations: Writing for Their Lives
Digest
This podcast delves into the history of women in science journalism, tracing their journey from the early 20th century to the present day. It begins by introducing the Story Collider podcast, which focuses on science-related narratives, and the Lost Women of Science Conversations podcast, which aims to inspire women in STEM by showcasing the stories of forgotten female scientists. The podcast then explores the personal experiences of two tech reporters, Katie Halfner and Deborah Unger, who faced sexism and discrimination in the 1980s. It examines the rise of science writing for popular audiences, discussing the role of mass media in popularizing science and the challenges of translating scientific concepts for a general audience. The podcast then highlights the contributions of women to early science journalism, focusing on the establishment of Science Service and the challenges they faced in a male-dominated field. It delves into the lives and work of two prominent women science writers, Emma Ray and Jane Stafford, exploring their experiences, contributions, and the challenges they faced. The podcast also examines the discrimination faced by women in science journalism and the Matilda effect, where male scientists take credit for the work of female scientists. It discusses Jane Stafford's efforts to address the Matilda effect in her writing and the challenges she faced in achieving equal pay and recognition. Finally, the podcast reflects on the lasting impact of women science journalists on the fields of science, medicine, and public health, highlighting their contributions to shaping public understanding of these topics, their advocacy for accurate information, and their resilience in overcoming challenges.
Outlines
The History of Women in Science Journalism
This podcast explores the history of women in science journalism, highlighting their contributions, challenges, and the lasting impact they've had on shaping public understanding of science and medicine. It covers topics such as the rise of science writing for popular audiences, the contributions of women to early science journalism, the Matilda effect, and the legacy of women science journalists.
Women in Tech Journalism: Facing Sexism and Discrimination
This chapter delves into the personal experiences of Katie Halfner and Deborah Unger, two tech reporters who faced sexism and discrimination in the 1980s. They share anecdotes about being mistaken for secretaries, experiencing inappropriate behavior, and facing challenges in establishing their credibility as journalists.
Women Pioneers in Science Journalism: Contributions and Challenges
This chapter focuses on the contributions of women to early science journalism. It highlights the establishment of Science Service, an organization that provided opportunities for women to write about science, and the challenges they faced in a male-dominated field. It also delves into the lives and work of two prominent women science writers, Emma Ray and Jane Stafford, exploring their experiences, contributions, and the challenges they faced.
The Matilda Effect and the Legacy of Women Science Journalists
This chapter examines the discrimination faced by women in science journalism and the Matilda effect, where male scientists take credit for the work of female scientists. It discusses Jane Stafford's efforts to address the Matilda effect in her writing and the challenges she faced in achieving equal pay and recognition. Finally, the podcast reflects on the lasting impact of women science journalists on the fields of science, medicine, and public health, highlighting their contributions to shaping public understanding of these topics, their advocacy for accurate information, and their resilience in overcoming challenges.
Keywords
Science Journalism
The practice of reporting on scientific research, discoveries, and advancements for a general audience. It involves translating complex scientific concepts into accessible language and engaging narratives.
Matilda Effect
A phenomenon where the contributions of female scientists are often overlooked or attributed to their male colleagues. This effect can hinder the recognition and advancement of women in science.
Science Service
A non-profit organization founded in 1921 to promote public understanding of science. It provided science news and features to newspapers and magazines, and played a significant role in the development of science journalism.
Stringers
Freelance journalists who work for a publication on a piecemeal basis, often without a contract or guaranteed income. They are typically paid for each story they submit, and their work can be crucial for covering local or niche topics.
Mass Media
Forms of communication that reach a large audience, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television, and the internet. Mass media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion, disseminating information, and influencing cultural trends.
Science Communication
The process of sharing scientific information and ideas with a broader audience. It encompasses various methods, including writing, speaking, visual media, and interactive exhibits, and aims to make science more accessible and engaging.
Q&A
What were some of the challenges faced by women science journalists in the early 20th century?
Women science journalists faced significant challenges, including sexism, discrimination, and a lack of opportunities for advancement. They were often paid less than their male counterparts, excluded from prestigious events, and faced skepticism about their ability to cover science effectively.
How did Science Service contribute to the development of science journalism?
Science Service played a crucial role in promoting science journalism by providing a platform for women to write about science and by disseminating science news to a wider audience. It also helped to establish standards for accuracy and objectivity in science reporting.
What is the Matilda effect, and how did Jane Stafford address it in her writing?
The Matilda effect refers to the tendency for the contributions of female scientists to be overlooked or attributed to their male colleagues. Jane Stafford addressed this issue by highlighting the work of Matilda Brooks, a female scientist whose discovery of a cyanide poisoning treatment was initially attributed to her male collaborators.
How did the work of women science journalists shape public understanding of science and public health?
Women science journalists played a significant role in shaping public understanding of science and public health by providing accurate and accessible information on a range of topics, including venereal disease, nutrition, and the impact of World War II. They also helped to raise awareness of important social issues and advocate for public health initiatives.
Show Notes
In the 1920s, when newspapers and magazines started to showcase stories about science, many of the early science journalists were women, working alongside their male colleagues despite less pay and outright misogyny. They were often single or divorced and, as Marcel Chotkowski LaFollette explains, writing for their lives. From Emma Reh, who traveled to Mexico to get a divorce and ended up trekking to archeological digs on horseback, to Jane Stafford, who took on taboo topics like sex and sexually transmitted diseases, they started a tradition of explaining science to non-scientists, accurately and with flair.