Mark Levin Audio Rewind - 9/13/24
2Digest
This podcast episode focuses on the 2020 presidential election, with Mark Levin and Brian Mudd analyzing the first debate and its implications. The episode begins with Brian Mudd filling in for Mark Levin, who is absent due to a knee injury. Mudd provides updates on Levin's condition and assures listeners that he will be back on Monday. The discussion then shifts to the debate, with Mudd discussing damage control strategies for those concerned about the state of the race. He argues that Trump is in a better position than he was in 2016, highlighting the media's cautious approach and analyzing the Washington Post's coverage of the debate. Mark Levin returns to the show and announces a new tax cut proposal, ending taxes on overtime. He criticizes Kamala Harris's economic plan, calling it a copy of Joe Biden's and lacking in substance. Levin emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election, highlighting the stark policy differences between Trump and Harris. He reminds listeners of Trump's success in 2016 despite significant challenges. Levin analyzes the debate's impact on undecided voters, arguing that it wasn't about Trump but about Harris's ability to define herself. He cites focus groups from Reuters and the New York Times, suggesting that Harris failed to convince undecided voters. Levin discusses polling data, highlighting that the debate did not significantly shift the race in Harris's favor. He emphasizes the importance of swing states and the undecided voters who could determine the outcome. Levin contrasts the perception that Harris dominated the debate with the reality that undecided voters found her lacking in substance. He argues that Harris missed her opportunity to connect with voters. Levin provides historical perspective on Trump's 2016 campaign and compares it to his current position. He discusses Trump's decision not to participate in a third debate, arguing that it is a smart strategic move. Levin discusses the situation in Springfield, Ohio, where a large influx of Haitian immigrants has strained local resources. He criticizes the media's focus on trivial details while ignoring the real issues. Levin highlights the significant increase in homelessness under the Biden-Harris administration, using data from KTVU in San Jose. He connects this to his earlier point about the importance of economic policies and their impact on people's lives. Levin emphasizes Trump's undefeated political record, comparing it to an NFL team's 3-0 start. He argues that Trump is in a strong position to win the election, despite the challenges he has faced. The speaker discusses how Donald Trump has faced numerous challenges and emerged victorious, highlighting his resilience and experience. In contrast, Kamala Harris is portrayed as lacking a strong track record and failing to connect with undecided voters. The speaker analyzes polling data, suggesting that Harris has reached her peak in popularity and Trump is gaining momentum. He cites specific polls and data points to support his claim, emphasizing Trump's strong position in the race. The speaker highlights Trump's policy proposals, particularly his tax plans, and argues that they are economically sound and beneficial. He criticizes Harris's lack of concrete policy positions and her reliance on superficial rhetoric. The speaker reinforces Trump's strong position in the election, citing polling data and historical comparisons. He emphasizes that Trump is outperforming his previous campaigns and is well-positioned to win. The speaker further criticizes Harris's economic policies, highlighting their lack of practicality and economic understanding. He contrasts this with Trump's supply-side economic approach, which he argues is more effective and beneficial. The speaker draws parallels between the current election and the 2016 election, highlighting the double standards and media bias against Trump. He expresses optimism about Trump's chances of winning, citing historical trends and voter sentiment. The speaker reassures listeners that Trump is well-positioned to win the election, despite the challenges and media narratives. He emphasizes the importance of voter participation and encourages listeners to get involved in the election process.
Outlines
Introduction and Debate Analysis
Mark Levin and Brian Mudd discuss the 2020 presidential election, analyzing the first debate and its implications. Mudd fills in for Levin, who is absent due to a knee injury, and provides updates on his condition. The discussion focuses on damage control strategies for those concerned about the state of the race, with Mudd arguing that Trump is in a better position than he was in 2016.
Mark Levin's Return and Economic Policy
Mark Levin returns to the show and announces a new tax cut proposal, ending taxes on overtime. He criticizes Kamala Harris's economic plan, calling it a copy of Joe Biden's and lacking in substance. Levin emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election, highlighting the stark policy differences between Trump and Harris.
Debate's Impact on Undecided Voters
Levin analyzes the debate's impact on undecided voters, arguing that it wasn't about Trump but about Harris's ability to define herself. He cites focus groups from Reuters and the New York Times, suggesting that Harris failed to convince undecided voters. Levin discusses polling data, highlighting that the debate did not significantly shift the race in Harris's favor.
Perception vs. Reality and Trump's Strategy
Levin contrasts the perception that Harris dominated the debate with the reality that undecided voters found her lacking in substance. He argues that Harris missed her opportunity to connect with voters. Levin provides historical perspective on Trump's 2016 campaign and compares it to his current position. He discusses Trump's decision not to participate in a third debate, arguing that it is a smart strategic move.
Springfield, Ohio and the Crisis of Immigration
Levin discusses the situation in Springfield, Ohio, where a large influx of Haitian immigrants has strained local resources. He criticizes the media's focus on trivial details while ignoring the real issues. Levin highlights the significant increase in homelessness under the Biden-Harris administration, using data from KTVU in San Jose.
Trump's Undefeated Record and the Importance of Perspective
Levin emphasizes Trump's undefeated political record, comparing it to an NFL team's 3-0 start. He argues that Trump is in a strong position to win the election, despite the challenges he has faced. The speaker discusses how Donald Trump has faced numerous challenges and emerged victorious, highlighting his resilience and experience.
Harris's Peak and Trump's Momentum
The speaker analyzes polling data, suggesting that Harris has reached her peak in popularity and Trump is gaining momentum. He cites specific polls and data points to support his claim, emphasizing Trump's strong position in the race.
Trump's Policy Advantage and Harris's Lack of Substance
The speaker highlights Trump's policy proposals, particularly his tax plans, and argues that they are economically sound and beneficial. He criticizes Harris's lack of concrete policy positions and her reliance on superficial rhetoric.
Trump's Strong Position in the Election
The speaker reinforces Trump's strong position in the election, citing polling data and historical comparisons. He emphasizes that Trump is outperforming his previous campaigns and is well-positioned to win.
Economic Illiteracy and Supply-Side Economics
The speaker further criticizes Harris's economic policies, highlighting their lack of practicality and economic understanding. He contrasts this with Trump's supply-side economic approach, which he argues is more effective and beneficial.
Double Standards and the 2016 Parallels
The speaker draws parallels between the current election and the 2016 election, highlighting the double standards and media bias against Trump. He expresses optimism about Trump's chances of winning, citing historical trends and voter sentiment.
Trump's Resilience and the Importance of Voting
The speaker reassures listeners that Trump is well-positioned to win the election, despite the challenges and media narratives. He emphasizes the importance of voter participation and encourages listeners to get involved in the election process.
Keywords
Damage Control
Strategies employed to minimize negative impacts of a crisis or scandal, often involving public relations efforts and crisis communication.
Undecided Voters
Voters who have not yet decided which candidate they will support in an election. They are often considered a key demographic in close races.
Focus Group
A small group of people selected to provide feedback on a product, service, or idea. They are often used in market research and political campaigns.
Homelessness
The state of being without a permanent residence, often due to poverty, lack of affordable housing, or other factors.
Supply-Side Economics
An economic theory that emphasizes tax cuts and deregulation to stimulate economic growth by increasing production and investment. It focuses on boosting the supply of goods and services rather than demand.
Double Standard
The application of different rules or standards to different people or groups, often based on prejudice or favoritism. It can lead to unfair treatment and discrimination.
Economic Illiteracy
Lack of understanding or knowledge about economic principles and concepts. It can lead to poor decision-making and ineffective policies.
Voter Turnout
The percentage of eligible voters who cast ballots in an election. It is a crucial factor in determining the outcome of an election, as higher turnout generally benefits the candidate with more support.
Q&A
How is Trump's current position compared to his situation in 2016?
Levin argues that Trump is in a much better position today than he was in 2016, despite the challenges he has faced. He points to the media's cautious approach and the fact that Trump is running ahead of where he was in 2016 at this point in the election cycle.
What was the main takeaway from the debate regarding undecided voters?
Levin believes that the debate was not about Trump, but about Harris's ability to define herself for undecided voters. He cites focus groups that suggest Harris failed to convince undecided voters and that they were more likely to vote for Trump after the debate.
What is the significance of the four percenters in this election?
Levin emphasizes that the four percent of voters who were undecided going into the debate are the only ones for whom the debate truly mattered. He argues that Harris missed her opportunity to win over these voters, and that their decisions could ultimately determine the outcome of the election.
What is Levin's perspective on Harris's economic plan?
Levin criticizes Harris's economic plan, calling it a copy of Joe Biden's and lacking in substance. He compares her proposed price controls to policies implemented in countries like Cuba and Venezuela, suggesting that they would be disastrous for the US economy.
What is the situation in Springfield, Ohio, and how does it relate to the broader political context?
Levin highlights the strain on local resources in Springfield, Ohio, due to a large influx of Haitian immigrants. He criticizes the media's focus on trivial details while ignoring the real issues, arguing that the situation illustrates the broader crisis of immigration and the impact of the Biden-Harris administration's policies.
What evidence does the speaker provide to support the claim that Kamala Harris has reached her peak in popularity?
The speaker cites polling data, including the Real Clear Politics point average, which shows Trump gaining momentum and Harris's support plateauing. He also points to the lack of a significant bounce for Harris after the Democratic National Convention, suggesting that she had already reached her maximum level of support.
How does the speaker contrast Trump's economic policies with those of Kamala Harris?
The speaker argues that Trump's supply-side economic policies, such as tax cuts and deregulation, are more effective in stimulating economic growth. He criticizes Harris's economic proposals as lacking substance and economic understanding, highlighting their impracticality and potential for negative consequences.
What parallels does the speaker draw between the current election and the 2016 election?
The speaker highlights the similarities in media bias and double standards against Trump in both elections. He also notes that both elections feature two women from blue states running for president, suggesting that they are not representative of the country at large.
Show Notes
On Friday’s Mark Levin Show, WJNO radio host Brian Mudd fills in for Mark. Election season is well underway, and anything can happen between now and November. In 2016 the election looked all but won for Hillary Clinton after the media leaked the Access Hollywood tape of Donald Trump. As much as the media will try to put their candidate in the best light possible, they know that Kamala Harris is no layup and will take a lot of propaganda to make her look good. The debate was a sham, but it did more of a disservice to Harris who was unable to explain any of her policies and left voters with more questions than answers. The rigged debate was meant to help Harris and hurt Trump, but Trump is now polling better in swing states like Michigan. You can lie to people about policy and those who are inclined to believe you will believe you, but you can’t lie to people about what’s in their wallet and if they have a roof over their head.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Table of contents
United States
