DiscoverAdministrative Static PodcastNCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners
NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners

Update: 2024-07-27
Share

Description

NCLA has filed an amicus curiae brief urging the Supreme Court to hear Consumers’ Research v. Consumer Product Safety Commission. This case presents a golden opportunity to overturn the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. Federal Trade Commission decision and address the unconstitutional structure of the CPSC. Under current law, the President can only fire CPSC commissioners “for neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,” insulating them from removal and violating the “Take Care” clause of Article II of the Constitution. The Fifth Circuit upheld this structure by invoking Humphrey’s Executor, which wrongly supported FTC Commissioners' similar protections.

In this episode, Senior Litigation Counsel Greg Dolin joins Mark and Vec to dive into the details and implications of this case.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners

NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Restore Presidential Control over “Independent” CPSC Commissioners

Administrative Static