One Nation, Under Money

One Nation, Under Money

Update: 2018-01-3068
Share

Description

An unassuming string of 16 words tucked into the Constitution grants Congress extensive power to make laws that impact the entire nation. The Commerce Clause has allowed Congress to intervene in all kinds of situations — from penalizing one man for growing too much wheat on his farm, to enforcing the end of racial segregation nationwide. That is, if the federal government can make an economic case for it. This seemingly all-powerful tool has the potential to unite the 50 states into one nation and protect the civil liberties of all. But it also challenges us to consider: when we make everything about money, what does it cost us?


 


The key voices:


- Roscoe Filbrun Jr., Son of Roscoe Filbrun Sr., respondent in Wickard v. Filburn
- Ollie McClung Jr., Son of Ollie McClung Sr., respondent in Katzenbach v. McClung
James M. Chen, professor at Michigan State University College of Law
Jami Floyd, legal analyst and host of WNYC’s All Things Considered who, as a domestic policy advisor in the Clinton White House, worked on the Violence Against Women Act
Ari J. Savitzky, lawyer at WilmerHale 


 


The key cases:


- 1824: Gibbons v. Ogden
- 1942: Wickard v. Filburn
- 1964: Katzenbach v. McClung
- 2000: United States v. Morrison
- 2012: National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius


 


Additional production for this episode by Derek John and Louis Mitchell.


Special thanks to Jess Mador, Andrew Yeager, and Rachel Iacovone.                                                                                                                   


Leadership support for More Perfect is provided by The Joyce Foundation. Additional funding is provided by The Charles Evans Hughes Memorial Foundation.


Supreme Court archival audio comes from Oyez®, a free law project in collaboration with the Legal Information Institute at Cornell.

Comments (1)

Adam Boarman

The argument that the farmer should be subject to the limits placed on production is, it seems, predicated on the federal government providing subsidies to the farmer for growing wheat. That is how the analogy of the wife sewing a dress for herself is not quite the same. If the government were to subsidize dress makers, guaranteeing all dresses a minimum price, then the case could be made to limit the number of dresses the wife can make.

Oct 4th
Reply
Download from Google Play
Download from App Store
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

One Nation, Under Money

One Nation, Under Money

WNYC Studios