![Podcast: R (Bridges) v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058](https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/aae31de270669898856123e9eef2ec5566e666668fd97e3b9c1653784023376b?s=96&d=retro&r=G "Podcast: R (Bridges) v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058")
Podcast: R (Bridges) v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058
Description
This is a summary of the judgment R (Bridges) v the Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058. The Court of Appeal considered whether or not the use of automated facial recognition technology by the police breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and whether they had complied with the public sector equality duty to consider the risk of indirect discrimination.
<figure class="wp-block-audio"></figure>
The cases mentioned in this podcast are:
R(Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] UKSC 9
Re Gallagher [2019] 2 WLR 509
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700
R(Bracking) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1345
‘Facial Recognition and Detection Technology: Developments and Challenges’, Communications Law Journal (2020) Vol 25, No 3
![Podcast: WM Morrison Supermarket plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents) [2020] UKSC12](https://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d07dfce3af53aa5fdb3b8b0fbc155e6f?s=96&d=retro&r=G "Podcast: WM Morrison Supermarket plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents) [2020] UKSC12")
![TIMES NEWSPAPERS Ltd v FLOOD; FROST AND OTHERS v MGN Ltd; MILLER v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2017] UKSC 33](https://privacylawbarrister.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/privacy_law_barrister_podcast_art.jpg?fit=3000%2C3000 "TIMES NEWSPAPERS Ltd v FLOOD; FROST AND OTHERS v MGN Ltd; MILLER v ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS Ltd [2017] UKSC 33")
United States
