Podcast Episode 527: Listen and Learn — Excuses for Non-Performance of a Contract
Description
Welcome back to the Law School Toolbox podcast! In this episode from our “Listen and Learn” series, we’re exploring the situations in which a party to a contract is claiming that their contractual obligations should be discharged as a result of supervening events that occurred after the formation of the contract. The three excuses for non-performance of a contract we’ll look at are: impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose.
In this episode we discuss:
- The rules for the impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose excuses for non-performance of a contract
- Two essay questions from previous California bar exams
Thanks for listening!
Listen Now
To listen now, just click on the arrow button above.
Resources:
- “Listen and Learn” series
- California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, February 2009
- California Bar Examination – Essay Questions and Selected Answers, July 2006
- Taylor v. Caldwell
- Krell v. Henry
- Podcast Episode 341: Listen and Learn – Contract Defenses
Prefer to read?
Did You Like It?
If you enjoy the podcast, we’d love a nice review and/or rating on Apple Podcasts or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Law School Toolbox website. If you’re concerned about the bar exam, check out our sister site, the Bar Exam Toolbox. You can also sign up for our weekly podcast newsletter to make sure you never miss an episode!
Thanks for listening!
The post Podcast Episode 527: Listen and Learn — Excuses for Non-Performance of a Contract appeared first on Law School Toolbox®.
United States
