PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff

Update: 2023-03-13

Description

The May 2012 Sackler Colloquium on “The Science of Science Communication” brought together scientists with research to communicate and scientists whose research could facilitate that communication. The latter include decision scientists who can identify the scientific results that an audience needs to know, from among all of the scientific results that it would be nice to know; behavioral scientists who can design ways to convey those results and then evaluate the success of those attempts; and social scientists who can create the channels needed for trustworthy communications. This overview offers an introduction to these communication sciences and their roles in science-based communication programs.

Comments

In Channel

PubReading [346] - Transparency Is the Key to Quality - A. Fosang & R. Colbran

2023-07-0313:40

PubReading [343] - The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM - E. Cech & M. Blair-Loy

2023-06-2628:43

PubReading [340] - The application of human tissue for drug discovery and development - M. Clotworthy

2023-06-1923:32

PubReading [334] - Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond - C. Allen & D. Mehler

2023-06-0549:15

PubReading [331] - Addressing Isolation in the Scientific Community - D. Tomasello

2023-05-2909:35

PubReading [328] - Reflections on scientific collaboration between basic researchers and clinicians - J. Muia & C. Casari

2023-05-2214:30

PubReading [327] - DNA storage in thermoresponsive microcapsules for repeated random multiplexed data access - B. Bögels, T. de Greef et al.

2023-05-1741:41

PubReading [325] - The Costs of Reproducibility - R. Poldrack

2023-05-1524:11

PubReading [323] - Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics - E. van Rooij, M. Fokkens-Bruinsma & E. Jansen

2023-05-0842:26

PubReading [320] - Deep Neural Networks as Scientific Models - R. Cichy and D. Kaiser

2023-05-0136:10

PubReading [315] - Technology transfer programme for influenza vaccines – Lessons from the past to inform the future - C. Chadwick, E. Sparrow et al.

2023-03-2710:42

PubReading [310] - How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper - R. Kallet

2023-03-2017:53

PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff

2023-03-1353:18

PubReading [300] - Randomisation in clinical trials - E. Beller, V. Gebski & A. Keech

2023-03-0612:18

PubReading [295] - Decentralized Clinical Trials The Future of Medical Product Development? - G. Van Norman,

2023-02-2713:42

PubReading [290] - Placebo Controls- Now??? - A. Caplan

2023-02-2009:00

PubReading [285] - Promoting Scientist–Advocate Collaborations in Cancer Research- Why and How - J. Salamone, A. Shajahan-Haq et al.

2023-02-1326:56

PubReading [280] - Ethics assessment in research proposals adopting CRISPR technology - F. Hirsch, R. Iphofen, Z. Koporc

2023-02-0625:48

PubReading [275] - The biospheric emergency calls for scientists to change tactics - F. Racimo, J. Halder et al.

2023-01-3038:47

PubReading [270] - Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature - T. Frandsen

2023-01-2323:26

00:00

PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff

#box-pro-ellipsis-176416402626560{-webkit-line-clamp:2;}PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff

PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff

PubReading [305] - The sciences of science communication - B. Fischhoff